Install
$ agentstack add skill-clarentcinematics-codex-skills-for-enterprise-data-quality-triage ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Data Quality Triage
Workflow
- Identify dataset purpose, grain, source date, key fields, date fields, and business use.
- Detect missing values, duplicate records, stale dates, inconsistent categories, and schema gaps.
- Separate deterministic data-quality findings from metric interpretation or business conclusions.
- Prioritize risks by downstream impact on reporting, operations, decisions, and automation.
- Recommend cleanup actions, source-system checks, and owner questions.
Script-Assisted Workflow
When given a CSV sample, run scripts/audit_data_quality.py --input before writing the triage. Add --key-fields, --date-fields, --stale-days, and --today when the dataset contract is known. Use --json for structured evidence. Do not let the helper infer missing values, metric definitions, or business truth.
Output Standard
Use this structure by default:
- Triage Summary: dataset, scope, row count, and overall quality risk.
- Critical Findings: duplicate keys, high-null fields, stale dates, schema blockers, or enum conflicts.
- Field-Level Evidence: field, issue, examples, and affected count or rate.
- Downstream Risk: dashboard, metric, workflow, or decision impact.
- Cleanup Actions: source-system checks, owner actions, and validation queries.
- Questions To Resolve: missing grain, key, owner, metric definition, or freshness context.
- Caveats: sample limitations and non-inferred fields.
Rules
- Do not invent missing values, metric definitions, row ownership, or source-of-truth status.
- Mark sample-based findings as sample-based.
- Treat high-impact reporting, finance, customer, or compliance data as requiring human review.
- Prefer deterministic checks before narrative interpretation.
References
Read references/data-quality-rubric.md when prioritizing findings or mapping data-quality risks to reporting, automation, or operational impact.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ClarentCinematics
- Source: ClarentCinematics/Codex-Skills-for-Enterprise
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.