Install
$ agentstack add skill-clarentcinematics-codex-skills-for-enterprise-support-deflection-miner ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Support Deflection Miner
Workflow
- Identify source type, date range, product area, customer segment, and support goal.
- Group repeated questions, symptoms, ticket subjects, and workaround requests.
- Separate documentation gaps, product friction, policy confusion, and automation opportunities.
- Prioritize by repetition, customer impact, confidence, and actionability.
- Produce proposed KB articles, product feedback, macros, automation candidates, and caveats.
Script-Assisted Workflow
When given ticket subjects in CSV or text form, run scripts/mine_support_themes.py --input first. Use --json when structured theme counts are needed. The helper surfaces repeated text patterns; Codex must still judge whether a theme is a KB gap, product issue, or workflow candidate.
Output Standard
Use this structure by default:
- Deflection Summary: source scope, top repeated issues, and confidence.
- Top Themes: theme, evidence, count, likely category, and caveats.
- Duplicate-Looking Requests: repeated subjects or near-repeated issue language.
- KB Opportunities: proposed article titles, audience, source evidence, and missing facts.
- Product / Process Signals: friction points requiring product, policy, or workflow review.
- Automation Candidates: macro, bot, form, routing, or script opportunities.
- Questions To Resolve: missing context needed before publishing or automating.
Rules
- Do not invent customer names, ticket counts beyond the provided input, root causes, SLA impact, or product commitments.
- Mark keyword clusters as heuristic, not definitive taxonomy.
- Keep customer-sensitive data out of examples unless already sanitized.
- Prefer small, reviewable deflection actions over broad automation claims.
References
Read references/deflection-rubric.md when deciding whether a repeated support theme should become a KB article, product bug, macro, or automation candidate.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ClarentCinematics
- Source: ClarentCinematics/Codex-Skills-for-Enterprise
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.