AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Deep Research

skill-cyranob-web-forager-deep-research · by CyranoB

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
18 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-cyranob-web-forager-deep-research

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-cyranob-web-forager-deep-research)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Deep Research? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Deep Research

This skill guides you through a structured deep research workflow: multi-angle search, selective full-page fetching, and synthesis into a polished, cited report.

Tools available

Search — run the packaged Web Forager CLI with uvx:

uvx --python '>=3.10,=3.10,=9.5.2' python - =3.10,<3.14' web-forager fetch "https://example.com" --format markdown

If uvx cannot run the packaged CLI, call Jina Reader directly:

curl -s "https://r.jina.ai/https://example.com"

No API key needed.

If MCP search/fetch tools are available in the session (e.g., mcp__web_forager__search, mcp__duckduckgo__search, or similar), prefer those over the above — they're faster and already wired in.


Research workflow

Step 1 — Understand the research question

Before searching, take a moment to understand what's actually being asked:

  • What's the core question or goal?
  • What kind of information would fully answer it? (facts, comparisons, recent news, how-tos, etc.)
  • Are there multiple angles worth exploring?

Step 2 — Multi-angle search strategy

Don't search just once. Run 2–3 searches with different query framings to get broader coverage. Think about:

  • A direct/obvious query ("Python async best practices 2024")
  • A more specific angle ("asyncio pitfalls production")
  • An alternative framing ("FastAPI async vs sync performance comparison")

Run all searches, collect results. Don't fetch URLs yet — evaluate snippets first.

Step 3 — Select URLs to fetch

From all the search results, pick the 3–5 most promising URLs based on:

  • Relevance: does the snippet suggest genuine depth on the topic?
  • Source quality: authoritative sources, docs, reputable publications over SEO filler
  • Diversity: don't pick 5 URLs from the same site — spread across sources
  • Recency: prefer recent sources for fast-moving topics

Briefly explain your URL selection to the user before fetching — this builds trust and lets them redirect you if you've chosen poorly.

Step 4 — Fetch full content

Fetch each selected URL using the uvx fetch command above. Use markdown format (default). If a fetch fails, skip that URL and note it in your sources section.

For very long pages, focus on the most relevant sections rather than including everything.

Step 5 — Synthesize the report

Write a structured report using the format below. The goal is a document the user can actually use — not a stream of consciousness, not a list of quotes.


Output format — adaptive

Scale the report to match the question. Not every question needs a 5-section report.

Quick answer (simple factual question, single-topic lookup)

When the user just needs a fact, a date, a comparison, or a short answer:

## [Answer title]
Direct answer in 2–4 sentences, with the key fact front and center.

**Sources:** [Title](url), [Title](url)

Standard report (most research questions)

# [Research title]

## Summary
2–4 sentence TL;DR that answers the core question directly.

## Key findings
- Bullet points of the most important, concrete things you learned
- Each bullet should stand alone — avoid "according to source X, ..."
- Include numbers, dates, specifics where available

## Sources
1. [Title](url) — one line describing what this source contributed

Deep dive (complex, multi-faceted, or strategic questions)

# [Research title]

## Summary
2–4 sentence TL;DR that answers the core question directly.

## Key findings
- Concrete bullet points with numbers, dates, specifics

## [Topic sections — 2–4 sections, named for what they cover]
Prose paragraphs going deeper on each major aspect.
Cite sources inline as [Source Name](url).

## Limitations & gaps
What you couldn't find, what's uncertain, where the user should dig further.

## Sources
1. [Title](url) — one line describing what this source contributed
2. [Title](url) — ...

Use your judgment. The goal is: give the user the right amount of information, not the maximum amount.


Quality reminders

  • Attribute claims: when you state something specific you learned from a source, cite it
  • Don't hallucinate: if you don't find something, say so in Limitations
  • Be concrete: vague summaries are useless. Dates, numbers, names, versions
  • Stay focused: it's easy to go wide; keep the report centered on what was actually asked
  • Fresh eyes on the draft: before presenting, re-read and cut anything repetitive or filler

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.