Install
$ agentstack add skill-danielvm-git-bigpowers-inspect-quality ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Inspect Quality
> HARD GATE — HARD GATE — Quality metrics (coverage, lint, cyclomatic complexity, security scans) must be monitored. If a metric degrades, surface it as a blocker. Do NOT accept regressions.
Run an interactive QA session. The user describes problems they're encountering. You clarify, explore the codebase for context, and log each issue to specs/bugs/registry.yaml with a structured, durable format.
For each issue the user raises
1. Listen and lightly clarify
Let the user describe the problem in their own words. Ask at most 2–3 short clarifying questions focused on:
- What they expected vs what actually happened
- Steps to reproduce (if not obvious)
- Whether it's consistent or intermittent
Do NOT over-interview. If the description is clear enough to log, move on.
2. Explore the codebase in the background
Kick off an Agent (subagent_type=Explore) to understand the relevant area. The goal is NOT to find a fix — it's to:
- Learn the domain language used in that area (check
specs/UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE_LATEST.mdif present) - Understand what the feature is supposed to do
- Identify the user-facing behavior boundary
3. Assess scope: single issue or breakdown?
Break down when:
- The fix spans multiple independent areas
- There are clearly separable concerns that could be worked on in parallel
- The user describes something with multiple distinct failure modes
Keep as a single issue when:
- It's one behavior that's wrong in one place
- The symptoms are all caused by the same root behavior
4. Log to specs/bugs/registry.yaml
Append the issue to specs/bugs/registry.yaml. Create the specs/bugs/ directory if it doesn't exist.
registry.yaml format
The file maintains a Markdown table with the following columns (derived from structured audit practice):
| Field | Description | |-------|-------------| | bug_id | BUG-YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSS | | date | YYYY-MM-DD | | severity | critical / high / medium / low | | priority | p0 / p1 / p2 / p3 | | scope | kebab-case area (e.g. auth, checkout) | | what_happened | actual behavior (user-facing terms) | | what_expected | expected behavior | | steps_to_reproduce | numbered steps | | root_cause | one-line hypothesis | | files_changed | filled in after fix | | approach | filled in after fix | | risk_level | low / medium / high | | new_tests | count (filled in after fix) | | type_check | pass / fail (filled in after fix) | | lint | pass / fail (filled in after fix) | | commit_type | fix / fix! / feat (filled in after fix) | | release_type | patch / minor / major (filled in after fix) | | commit_message | Conventional Commits message (filled in after fix) | | follow_ups | semicolon-separated follow-up items | | file | path to detailed specs/bugs/BUG-*.md (filled in by investigate-bug) | | status | open / in-progress / fixed / wont-fix |
When a bug is fixed (via validate-fix), update the relevant row with the resolution fields.
Issue body (for context below the table)
For each bug, also append a detail section:
### BUG-YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSS: [short title]
**What happened:** [actual behavior, plain language]
**What I expected:** [expected behavior]
**Steps to reproduce:**
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
**Additional context:** [domain-language observations, no file paths]
Rules for all entries
- bug_id uses full timestamp:
BUG-YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSS— matches the individual bug file name inspecs/bugs/ - No file paths or line numbers — these go stale
- Use the project's domain language (check
specs/UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE_LATEST.mdif it exists) - Describe behaviors, not code — "the sync service fails to apply the patch" not "applyPatch() throws"
- Reproduction steps are mandatory — if you can't determine them, ask the user
5. Continue the session
After logging, ask: "Next issue, or are we done?" Keep going until the user says done. Each issue is independent — don't batch them.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: danielvm-git
- Source: danielvm-git/bigpowers
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.