Install
$ agentstack add skill-dongcs52-claude-bd-skills-bd-proposal ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Customer Proposal Generator
A customer proposal turns a discovery call into a signature. This skill generates the full proposal — problem, solution, scope, pricing, success criteria, ROI — in markdown that can be exported to PDF or pasted into a deck.
Different from /bd-partner-pitch: That one is for partner term sheets (rev share, exclusivity, co-marketing). THIS is for end customers (pricing, SOW, ROI).
Input
Required:
- Customer name + persona contacted
- Discovery summary — pain, current state, goal, timeline (or
qualification-{lead}.md) - Offer / package being proposed
Optional:
icp-profile.json- Competitor context (if displacing)
- Pricing options (if multiple tiers proposed)
- Existing
account-{customer}.mdfrom/bd-research
Process
- Read context — pull discovery insights, ICP, account research
- Confirm offer + pricing — ask user if not in input
- Choose proposal format based on deal type:
- SaaS subscription — pricing tiers, usage-based, add-ons
- Agency / services — fixed-fee + retainer + perf
- Consulting — phased SOW with deliverables
- Hybrid — software + services
- Build proposal sections (see template below)
- Add ROI math — input-driven if data available
- Save —
proposal-{customer}.md
Output: proposal-{customer}.md
# Proposal for [Customer Name]
## [Project / Engagement Name]
**Prepared for:** [Customer Name + persona]
**Prepared by:** [Your Company + sender]
**Date:** [Date]
**Valid until:** [Date + 30 days]
**Version:** 1.0
---
## Executive Summary
[3 sentences:]
1. The problem [Customer] is facing (as we heard it)
2. What we recommend
3. Expected outcome and timeline
---
## 1. Situation (what we heard from you)
**Current state:**
- [Specific pain 1 from discovery]
- [Specific pain 2]
- [Specific pain 3]
**Cost of inaction:**
- [Quantified — $/time/risk]
- [Quantified — $/time/risk]
**Goals you shared:**
- [Goal 1 with metric]
- [Goal 2 with metric]
- [Timeline / pressure]
**Stakeholders involved:**
- [Champion — name + role]
- [Economic buyer]
- [End users]
---
## 2. Recommended Solution
### What we propose
[1-paragraph description of the solution — outcome-led, not feature-led]
### Why this approach
| Your need | Our approach | Why it works |
|---|---|---|
| [Need 1] | [Approach] | [Reasoning] |
| [Need 2] | [Approach] | [Reasoning] |
| [Need 3] | [Approach] | [Reasoning] |
### What's included
- ✅ [Deliverable 1]
- ✅ [Deliverable 2]
- ✅ [Deliverable 3]
- ✅ [Deliverable 4]
### What's NOT included (out of scope)
- ❌ [Out of scope 1] — available as add-on
- ❌ [Out of scope 2]
---
## 3. Scope of Work
### Phase 1: [Name] — Weeks 1-2
**Objective:** [Outcome]
**Deliverables:**
- [Deliverable + owner]
- [Deliverable + owner]
**Your involvement:** [Time commitment + roles needed]
### Phase 2: [Name] — Weeks 3-6
[Same structure]
### Phase 3: [Name] — Weeks 7-12
[Same structure]
### Timeline visual
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [Phase 1 ────][─── Phase 2 ───][─── Phase 3 ───]
---
## 4. Investment
### Option A: [Recommended Tier Name]
| Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| [Software / Services line item] | $X,XXX |
| [Implementation / setup] | $X,XXX |
| [Ongoing / retainer / subscription] | $X,XXX/mo |
| **Total Year 1** | **$XX,XXX** |
**Payment terms:** [Net 30 / Net 60 / 50% upfront / etc]
**Contract length:** [12 months auto-renew]
### Option B: [Alternative Tier]
[If proposing 2-3 options — pricing pyramid: bronze/silver/gold]
[Same structure]
### Option C: [Premium Tier]
[Same structure]
### Pricing notes
- All prices in [currency], excl. tax
- Volume discounts: [if applicable]
- Multi-year discount: [10–20% off for 2-year prepay]
- Pilot option: [Pilot terms if available]
---
## 5. Success Criteria
How we'll measure success — agreed up front:
| Metric | Baseline (today) | Target (90 days) | Target (12 months) |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric 1] | [Number] | [Number] | [Number] |
| [Metric 2] | [Number] | [Number] | [Number] |
| [Metric 3] | [Number] | [Number] | [Number] |
**Review cadence:** [Monthly / quarterly QBR with stakeholders]
**What "success" looks like:** [1-paragraph qualitative]
---
## 6. ROI Analysis
### Input assumptions
- [Customer's current cost / pain quantified]
- [Customer's current scale]
- [Industry benchmarks]
### Expected return
| Driver | Year 1 impact | Year 2 impact |
|---|---|---|
| [Cost saved] | $X | $X |
| [Revenue gained] | $X | $X |
| [Time saved → reallocated] | $X | $X |
| **Total impact** | **$XX,XXX** | **$XX,XXX** |
### ROI calculation
- **Investment:** $XX (Year 1)
- **Return:** $XX (Year 1)
- **ROI:** XXX%
- **Payback period:** X months
---
## 7. Why Us
[1 paragraph — connect specifically to their stated needs. NOT generic "Why Choose [Company]"]
### Customer outcomes
| Customer | Similar to your situation | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| [Customer 1] | [How they're similar] | [Specific outcome + metric] |
| [Customer 2] | [How they're similar] | [Specific outcome + metric] |
| [Customer 3] | [How they're similar] | [Specific outcome + metric] |
### Quotes / testimonials
> "[Pull quote with attribution]"
> — [Name, Title, Company]
> "[Pull quote with attribution]"
> — [Name, Title, Company]
---
## 8. Risks & Mitigations
[Don't hide risks — addressing them directly builds trust]
| Risk | Probability | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| [Implementation delay] | Medium | Phased rollout, dedicated PM |
| [User adoption] | Medium | Champion enablement, training plan |
| [Integration complexity] | Low | Pre-discovery completed, scoped above |
| [Change management] | Medium | Communications plan included |
---
## 9. Next Steps
To move forward:
1. **[Date 1]** — Review proposal with [stakeholders] (you)
2. **[Date 2]** — Q&A session (us, 30 min)
3. **[Date 3]** — Sign / commercial terms (you + procurement)
4. **[Date 4]** — Kickoff (joint)
### What I need from you to lock the kickoff
- [ ] Sign-off on this proposal
- [ ] Intro to [missing stakeholder] for security review
- [ ] [Any data / access needed for kickoff]
---
## 10. Terms & Conditions Summary
[High-level — full terms in MSA / contract]
- **Term:** [12 months auto-renew unless 60-day notice]
- **Payment:** [Net 30 from invoice date]
- **SLA:** [99.X% uptime, response time]
- **Data:** [Customer owns data, exit policy, security certs]
- **Liability:** [Standard caps, refer to MSA]
- **Termination:** [60-day notice, no penalty after pilot]
---
## Acceptance
By signing below, [Customer Name] accepts the scope, investment, and terms above for **Option [A/B/C]**.
**[Customer signatory name]**
Title: __________________________
Signature: ______________________
Date: ___________________________
**[Your signatory name]**
Title: __________________________
Signature: ______________________
Date: ___________________________
---
## Appendix
- A. Detailed feature comparison
- B. Security & compliance documentation
- C. Implementation playbook
- D. Reference customers + intro requests
- E. Master Services Agreement (separate doc)
Pricing structure guidance
Pick the right pricing model based on deal type:
SaaS subscription
- Per-seat — clear, scalable, but caps growth
- Per-usage — usage-aligned, but unpredictable for buyer
- Tiered (good/better/best) — anchors decision, drives upsell
- Platform fee + variable — combines predictability + scaling
Agency / services
- Fixed-fee project — clean, but limits scope changes
- Retainer — predictable revenue, requires SLA
- Performance-based — high upside, but requires trust + measurement
- Hybrid (retainer + perf bonus) — best for long-term clients
Consulting
- Time + materials (T&M) — flexible, but buyer hates uncertainty
- Fixed-fee phased — scope-controlled, requires good discovery
- Outcome-based — premium pricing, requires strict success criteria
Rules
- Always offer 3 options — bronze/silver/gold or pilot/standard/premium. Single-option proposals get fewer signatures.
- Lead with situation, not solution. Show you listened first.
- ROI is non-negotiable. Even rough math beats no math. CFOs respond to numbers.
- Risks section builds trust. Hiding risks is a red flag for procurement.
- Make it easy to say yes. Pre-fill signature blocks, dates, next steps.
- Personalize. Use customer's exact words from discovery in Section 1.
- Make pricing scannable. A pricing table beats a paragraph of pricing prose.
Next steps to suggest
/bd-objection— prep responses for objections likely after sending/bd-followup— design follow-up cadence for proposal review- After signature: pass to delivery team — proposal becomes the SOW baseline
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: dongcs52
- Source: dongcs52/claude-bd-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.