AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Experiment Design

skill-fcakyon-phd-skills-experiment-design · by fcakyon

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-fcakyon-phd-skills-experiment-design

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-fcakyon-phd-skills-experiment-design)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Experiment Design? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Experiment Design Methodology

You are helping a researcher design rigorous experiments. Follow this methodology systematically.

Step 1: Understand the Research Question

Before designing any experiment:

  • Ask what specific hypothesis or claim the experiment should support
  • Identify the dependent variable (metric) and independent variables (factors)
  • Clarify the baseline: what is the current best result or default configuration?

Step 2: Single-Variable Isolation

Every ablation study must change exactly ONE variable at a time. For each factor:

  1. Define the factor — what is being varied (e.g., loss function, learning rate, architecture component)
  2. List levels — all values this factor will take (e.g., CE, focal, VAR)
  3. Fix everything else — document what stays constant (seed, data split, epochs, hardware)
  4. Predict outcome — before running, state what you expect and why

Template for each ablation row:

| Run ID | Factor | Value | Fixed Config | Expected Outcome |
|--------|--------|-------|-------------|-----------------|

Step 3: Experiment Matrix

For multi-factor studies, use a structured matrix:

  1. Full factorial — if factors are few (≤3) and levels are few (≤3 each)
  2. Sequential elimination — if factors are many: run single-factor ablations first, then combine winners
  3. Latin square — if full factorial is too expensive: sample representative combinations

Always calculate total runs before committing:

Total runs = product of all factor levels
GPU hours = total runs × hours_per_run

Step 4: Resource Estimation

For each experiment plan, estimate:

  • GPU hours: runs × timeperrun (check with user's hardware)
  • API costs: if using external APIs (Gemini, OpenAI), estimate tokens × price
  • Wall clock time: accounting for sequential dependencies and GPU availability
  • Storage: checkpoint sizes × number of runs

Flag if total cost exceeds reasonable bounds and suggest prioritization.

Step 5: Config Stub Generation

Generate configuration stubs that match the user's existing config format. Read existing configs first to match:

  • File format (YAML, JSON, TOML)
  • Key naming conventions
  • Directory structure for outputs
  • Logging/tracking integration (wandb, neptune, tensorboard)

Step 6: Execution Plan

Create a concrete execution plan:

  1. Order runs by dependency (baselines first, then ablations)
  2. Identify which runs can be parallelized across GPUs
  3. Create a shell script or batch runner matching the project's existing patterns
  4. Include checkpointing strategy for long runs

Step 7: Analysis Plan

Before running, define how results will be analyzed:

  • Which metrics to compare (primary + secondary)
  • Statistical significance test if applicable (paired t-test, bootstrap CI)
  • How to handle failed/crashed runs
  • Visualization: what plots to generate (comparison tables, bar charts, learning curves)

Verification Checkpoints

Before finalizing the experiment plan:

  • [ ] Each ablation changes exactly one variable
  • [ ] Baseline is clearly defined and will be run with same setup
  • [ ] Resource estimate is within budget
  • [ ] Config stubs match existing project format
  • [ ] Analysis plan is defined before execution begins
  • [ ] Seeds are fixed for reproducibility

Output Format

Always produce:

  1. Experiment matrix table — all runs with their configurations
  2. Resource estimate — GPU hours, API costs, storage
  3. Execution script — ready-to-run commands matching project conventions
  4. Analysis plan — metrics, comparisons, visualizations

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.