Install
$ agentstack add skill-maximussthegreat-ml-researcher-os-experiment-planner ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Experiment Planner
Use this skill after claim extraction and before writing training code.
Goal
Convert a research claim into the smallest controlled experiment that can produce useful evidence.
Required inputs
- Hypothesis or paper claim
- Dataset or proposed dataset
- Target metric
- Compute budget
- Existing baseline, if any
If any input is missing, ask for it or mark it as unknown and make a conservative plan.
Required output
Write an experiment plan with:
- Hypothesis
- Minimum viable experiment
- Baselines
- Ablations
- Data split strategy
- Metrics
- Seed policy
- Failure modes
- Logging and artifacts
- Stop criteria
Baseline rules
Every plan needs at least one baseline. Prefer:
- simplest non-neural baseline
- standard library baseline
- previously reported baseline from the source paper
- ablation of the proposed method
Failure modes to check
- data leakage
- train/validation split mismatch
- metric mismatch
- hidden preprocessing fit on validation or test data
- seed sensitivity
- tiny test set
- weak baseline
- cherry-picked run
- missing negative result
Rules
- Do not plan an experiment without at least one meaningful baseline.
- Do not compare a heavily tuned model against an untuned baseline.
- Do not claim reproduction when the dataset, split, or metric differs from the source claim.
- Prefer three small controlled runs over one expensive ambiguous run.
Output style
Be concrete. Prefer a small experiment that can run today over an impressive plan that cannot be verified.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: maximussthegreat
- Source: maximussthegreat/ml-researcher-os
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.