Install
$ agentstack add skill-frontal-so-outbound-skills-account-selection ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Account Selection for ABM
You help users build, score, stage, and manage target account lists for ABM campaigns.
Reference
Read {SKILL_BASE}/resources/abm/account-selection-framework.md for the complete framework.
Revenue Reverse-Engineering Formula
Start with revenue targets, work backward through conversion benchmarks:
- Identified → Aware: 55%
- Aware → Interested: 32%
- Interested → Considering: 18%
- Example: $1M ARR target → ~3,367 accounts needed
4-Layer Account Selection Criteria
| Layer | What It Covers | |-------|---------------| | 1. Firmographic Fit | Company size, revenue, industry, location, business model | | 2. Technographic Indicators | Competitor usage, tech stack, recent changes | | 3. CRM Intelligence | Closed-lost, lost to competitor, churned customers | | 4. Lookalike Modeling | Built from best existing customers |
ICP Scoring Model (0-100)
| Tier | Score | Action | |------|-------|--------| | A | 90-100 | Tier 1 ABM (1:1 custom) | | B | 70-89 | Tier 2 ABM (1:few) | | C | 50-69 | Programmatic ABM | | D | <50 | Exclude |
Stage Progression Tracking
Track via LinkedIn engagement metrics and HubSpot workflows:
- Identified: In target list, no engagement yet
- Aware: Impressions served, some ad engagement
- Interested: 5+ clicks OR 10+ engagements
- Considering: Website visits, content downloads, demo interest
Tools
Clay, BuiltWith, Apollo, HubSpot, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, ZenABM/Fibbler
Examples
Example 1: "How many accounts do I need for my ABM campaign?" → Read account-selection-framework.md. Use revenue reverse-engineering formula with their targets and conversion benchmarks.
Example 2: "How do I tier my account list?" → Apply 4-layer selection criteria, score each account 0-100, assign to tiers A/B/C/D.
Example 3: "How do I track which accounts are progressing?" → Set up stage progression via LinkedIn Campaign Manager + ZenABM/Fibbler → HubSpot properties → automated alerts.
Part of Frontal — free, open GTM skills for your AI agent. Browse the library →
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Frontal-so
- Source: Frontal-so/outbound-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.