Install
$ agentstack add skill-getcrew44-crew44-finance-metrics-quickref ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Purpose
Quick reference for any SaaS finance metric without deep teaching. Use this when you need a fast formula lookup, benchmark check, or decision framework reminder. For detailed explanations, calculations, and examples, see the related deep-dive skills.
This is not a teaching tool—it's a cheat sheet optimized for speed. Scan, find, apply.
Key Concepts
Metric Categories
Metrics are organized into four families:
- Revenue & Growth — Top-line money (revenue, ARPU, ARPA, MRR/ARR, churn, NRR, expansion)
- Unit Economics — Customer-level profitability (CAC, LTV, payback, margins)
- Capital Efficiency — Cash management (burn rate, runway, OpEx, net income)
- Efficiency Ratios — Growth vs. profitability balance (Rule of 40, magic number)
When to Use This Skill
Use this when:
- You need a quick formula or benchmark
- You're preparing for a board meeting or investor call
- You're evaluating a decision and need to check which metrics matter
- You want to identify red flags quickly
Don't use this when:
- You need detailed calculation guidance (use
saas-revenue-growth-metricsorsaas-economics-efficiency-metrics) - You're learning these metrics for the first time (start with deep-dive skills)
- You need examples and common pitfalls (covered in related skills)
Application
All Metrics Reference Table
| Metric | Formula | What It Measures | Good Benchmark | Red Flag | |------------|-------------|----------------------|-------------------|--------------| | Revenue | Total sales before expenses | Top-line money earned | Growth rate >20% YoY (varies by stage) | Revenue growing slower than costs | | ARPU | Total Revenue / Total Users | Revenue per individual user | Varies by model; track trend | ARPU declining cohort-over-cohort | | ARPA | MRR / Active Accounts | Revenue per customer account | SMB: $100-$1K; Mid: $1K-$10K; Ent: $10K+ | High ARPA + low ARPU (undermonetized seats) | | ACV | Annual Recurring Revenue per Contract | Annualized contract value | SMB: $5K-$25K; Mid: $25K-$100K; Ent: $100K+ | ACV declining (moving downmarket unintentionally) | | MRR/ARR | MRR × 12 = ARR | Predictable recurring revenue | Growth + quality matter; track components | New MRR declining while churn stable/growing | | Churn Rate | Customers Lost / Starting Customers | % of customers who cancel | Monthly 120% excellent; 100-120% good; 90-100% ok | NRR 4 excellent; 2-4 healthy; 5:1 underinvesting | LTV:CAC 24 concerning | Payback >24 months (cash trap) | | Contribution Margin | (Revenue - All Variable Costs) / Revenue × 100 | True contribution after variable costs | 60-80% good for SaaS; 40 healthy; 25-40 ok; 0.75 efficient; 0.5-0.75 ok; OpEx growth | OpEx growing faster than revenue | | Gross vs. Net Revenue | Net = Gross - Discounts - Refunds - Credits | What you actually keep | Refunds 10% (product problem) | | Revenue Concentration | Top N Customers / Total Revenue | Dependency on largest customers | Top customer 25% (existential risk) | | Revenue Mix | Product/Segment Revenue / Total Revenue | Portfolio composition | No single product >60% ideal | Single product >80% (no diversification) | | Cohort Analysis | Group customers by join date; track behavior | Whether business improving or degrading | Recent cohorts same/better than old | Newer cohorts perform worse | | CAC Payback by Channel | CAC / Monthly Contribution (by channel) | Payback by acquisition channel | Compare across channels | One channel far worse than others | | Gross Margin Payback | CAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %) | Payback using actual profit | Typically 1.5-2x simple payback | Payback using margin >36 months | | Unit Economics | Revenue per unit - Cost per unit | Profitability of each "unit" | Positive contribution required | Negative contribution margin | | Segment Payback | CAC / Monthly Contribution (by segment) | Payback by customer segment | Compare to allocate resources | One segment unprofitable | | Incrementality | Revenue caused by action - Baseline | True impact of marketing/promo | Measure with holdout tests | Celebrating revenue that would've happened anyway | | Working Capital | Cash timing between revenue and collection | Cash vs. revenue timing | Annual upfront > monthly billing | Long payment terms killing runway |
Quick Decision Frameworks
Use these frameworks to combine metrics for common PM decisions.
Framework 1: Should We Build This Feature?
Ask:
- Revenue impact? Direct (pricing, add-on) or indirect (retention, conversion)?
- Margin impact? What's the COGS? Does it dilute margins?
- ROI? Revenue impact / Development cost
Build if:
- ROI >3x in year one (direct monetization), OR
- LTV impact >10x development cost (retention), OR
- Strategic value overrides short-term ROI
Don't build if:
- Negative contribution margin even with optimistic adoption
- Payback period exceeds average customer lifetime
Metrics to check: Revenue, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin
Framework 2: Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?
Ask:
- Unit economics? CAC, LTV, LTV:CAC ratio
- Cash efficiency? Payback period
- Customer quality? Cohort retention, NRR by channel
- Scalability? Magic Number, addressable volume
Scale if:
- LTV:CAC >3:1 AND
- Payback 0.75
Don't scale if:
- LTV:CAC 50% YoY
- LTV:CAC >3:1
- Gross Margin >70%
- Runway >12 months
Growth Stage ($10M-$50M ARR):
- Growth Rate >40% YoY
- NRR >100%
- Rule of 40 >40
- Magic Number >0.75
Scale Stage ($50M+ ARR):
- Growth Rate >25% YoY
- NRR >110%
- Rule of 40 >40
- Profit Margin >10%
Metrics to check: Revenue Growth, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Gross Margin
Red Flags by Category
Revenue & Growth Red Flags
| Red Flag | What It Means | Action | |--------------|-------------------|------------| | Churn increasing cohort-over-cohort | Product-market fit degrading | Stop scaling acquisition; fix retention first | | NRR logo churn | Losing big customers | Investigate why high-value customers leave | | Quick Ratio 50% in top 10 customers | Existential dependency risk | Diversify customer base |
Unit Economics Red Flags
| Red Flag | What It Means | Action | |--------------|-------------------|------------| | LTV:CAC 24 months | Cash trap (long cash recovery) | Negotiate annual upfront or reduce CAC | | Gross margin <60% | Low profitability per dollar | Increase prices or reduce COGS | | CAC increasing while LTV flat | Unit economics degrading | Optimize conversion or reduce sales cycle | | Contribution margin <40% | Unprofitable after variable costs | Cut variable costs or increase prices |
Capital Efficiency Red Flags
| Red Flag | What It Means | Action | |--------------|-------------------|------------| | Runway <6 months | Survival crisis | Raise capital immediately or cut burn | | Net burn accelerating without revenue growth | Burning faster without results | Cut costs or increase revenue urgency | | OpEx growing faster than revenue | Negative operating leverage | Freeze hiring; optimize spend | | Rule of 40 <25 | Burning cash without growth | Improve growth or cut to profitability | | Magic Number <0.5 | S&M engine broken | Fix GTM efficiency before scaling spend |
When to Use Which Metric
Prioritizing features:
- Revenue impact → Revenue, ARPU, Expansion Revenue
- Margin impact → Gross Margin, Contribution Margin
- ROI → LTV impact, Development cost
Evaluating channels:
- Acquisition cost → CAC, CAC by Channel
- Customer value → LTV, NRR by Channel
- Payback → Payback Period, CAC Payback by Channel
- Scalability → Magic Number
Pricing decisions:
- Monetization → ARPU, ARPA, ACV
- Impact → Churn Rate, NRR, Expansion Revenue
- Efficiency → CAC Payback (will pricing change affect it?)
Business health:
- Growth → Revenue Growth, MRR/ARR Growth
- Retention → Churn Rate, NRR, Quick Ratio
- Economics → LTV:CAC, Payback Period, Gross Margin
- Efficiency → Rule of 40, Magic Number, Operating Leverage
- Survival → Burn Rate, Runway
Board/investor reporting:
- Key metrics: ARR, Revenue Growth %, NRR, LTV:CAC, Rule of 40, Magic Number, Burn Rate, Runway
- Stage-specific: Early stage emphasize growth + unit economics; Growth stage emphasize Rule of 40 + Magic Number; Scale stage emphasize profitability + efficiency
Examples
Example 1: Feature Investment Sanity Check
You are deciding whether to build a premium export feature.
- Use Framework 1 (Should We Build This Feature?)
- Pull baseline metrics: ARPU, Gross Margin, LTV, Contribution Margin
- Model optimistic, base, and downside adoption
- Reject if contribution margin turns negative in downside case
Quick output:
- Base case ROI: 3.8x
- Contribution margin impact: +4 points
- Decision: Build now, with a 90-day post-launch check on churn and expansion
Example 2: Channel Scale Decision
Paid social is generating many signups but weak retention.
- Use Framework 2 (Should We Scale This Acquisition Channel?)
- Check CAC, LTV:CAC, Payback Period, and NRR by channel
- Compare against best-performing channel, not company average
Quick output:
- LTV:CAC: 1.6:1
- Payback: 26 months
- NRR: 88%
- Decision: Do not scale; cap spend and run targeted optimization tests
Common Pitfalls
- Using blended company averages instead of cohort or channel-level metrics
- Scaling acquisition when Quick Ratio is weak and retention is deteriorating
- Treating high LTV:CAC as sufficient without checking payback and runway impact
- Raising prices based on ARPU lift alone without modeling churn and contraction
- Comparing benchmarks across mismatched company stages or business models
- Tracking many metrics without a clear decision question
References
Related Skills (Deep Dives)
saas-revenue-growth-metrics— Detailed guidance on revenue, retention, and growth metrics (13 metrics)saas-economics-efficiency-metrics— Detailed guidance on unit economics and capital efficiency (17 metrics)feature-investment-advisor— Uses these metrics to evaluate feature ROIacquisition-channel-advisor— Uses these metrics to evaluate channel viabilityfinance-based-pricing-advisor— Uses these metrics to evaluate pricing changesbusiness-health-diagnostic— Uses these metrics to diagnose business health
External Resources
- Bessemer Venture Partners: "SaaS Metrics 2.0" — Comprehensive SaaS benchmarking
- David Skok (Matrix Partners): "SaaS Metrics" blog series — Deep dive on unit economics
- Tomasz Tunguz (Redpoint): SaaS benchmarking research and blog
- ChartMogul, Baremetrics, ProfitWell: SaaS analytics platforms with metric definitions
- SaaStr: Annual SaaS benchmarking surveys
Provenance
- Adapted from
research/finance/Finance_QuickRef.md - Formulas from
research/finance/Finance for Product Managers.md - Decision frameworks from
research/finance/Finance_For_PMs.Putting_It_Together_Synthesis.md
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: getcrew44
- Source: getcrew44/crew44
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://crew44.io
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.