Install
$ agentstack add skill-getsentry-skills-iterate-pr ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Iterate on PR Until CI Passes
Goal: fix actionable CI failures and high/medium review feedback. Stop and report human approval, draft-readiness, and merge-readiness gates.
Requires:
- authenticated
gh uv- target repository root as cwd
- skill-root-relative script paths, for example
scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py
Bundled Scripts
| Script | Run | Output | |--------|-----|--------| | scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py | uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER] | JSON: pr, summary, checks, failure snippets | | scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py | uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER] | JSON buckets: high, medium, low, bot, resolved | | scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py | uv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER] | terminal marker plus tab-separated checks | | scripts/reply_to_thread.py | uv run scripts/reply_to_thread.py THREAD_ID BODY [...] | JSON reply results |
Check summary fields include failed, pending, actionable_pending, and human_gate_pending.
Monitor markers:
ALL_CHECKS_PASSEDCHECKS_DONE_WITH_FAILURESNO_CHECKS_REGISTEREDDRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKSCHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE
Workflow
1. Identify PR
Run:
gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecision
Stop when:
- no PR exists
- draft PR has no checks after monitor grace period: report
DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS
Draft rule: inspect existing checks/feedback only. Do not mark ready for review unless asked.
2. Handle Feedback
Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER].
| Bucket | Action | |--------|--------| | high | fix | | medium | fix | | low | ask user which to address | | bot | skip informational comments | | resolved | skip |
Feedback fix checklist:
- verify root cause
- search related code
- fix all instances
- for
review_bot: true: fix real issues, explain false positives
Low-priority prompt format:
Found 3 low-priority suggestions:
1. [l] "Consider renaming this variable" - @reviewer in api.py:42
2. [nit] "Could use a list comprehension" - @reviewer in utils.py:18
3. [style] "Add a docstring" - @reviewer in models.py:55
Which should I address? ("1,3", "all", or "none")
3. Check CI Status
Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER].
| State | Action | |-------|--------| | failed > 0 and actionable_pending == 0 | fix failures | | actionable_pending > 0 | wait; poll feedback while waiting | | pending > 0 and actionable_pending == 0 | report CHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE | | no checks after grace period | report NO_CHECKS_REGISTERED or DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS | | all actionable checks passed | run post-CI feedback check |
Wait for actionable review bots: sentry, warden, cursor, bugbot, seer, codeql. Do not wait for approval, isDraft, REVIEW_REQUIRED, Codecov, or informational bots.
4. Fix CI Failures
For each failure:
- read full log:
gh run view --log-failed - trace from assertion/exception/lint rule to source
- state the cause before editing: "fails because X, affected by Y"
- search related call sites/patterns
- fix root cause, not symptom
- add focused test coverage when needed
5. Verify Locally, Then Commit and Push
Before commit:
- test fix: rerun specific test
- lint/type fix: rerun affected checker
- code fix: rerun covering tests
- local failure: fix before pushing
git add
git commit -m "fix: "
git push
6. Monitor CI and Address Feedback
Loop:
- run
uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py - handle table in step 3
- while
actionable_pending > 0, runuv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py - fix new high/medium feedback immediately
- if changed, verify, commit, push, restart loop
- otherwise sleep 30 seconds and repeat
- after checks pass, wait 10 seconds, fetch feedback once more
- if new high/medium feedback exists, return to step 4
Claude Code optional: run uv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py through MonitorTool with persistent: false; set timeout to normal repo CI duration. Restart the monitor after every push.
Exit Conditions
| Exit | Conditions | |------|------------| | Success | actionable CI passed; post-CI feedback clean; low-priority choice handled | | Ask user | same failure after 2 attempts; feedback unclear; infrastructure issue | | Stop | no PR; branch needs rebase; no checks; draft no-checks; only human gates remain |
Fallback
If scripts fail, use gh CLI directly:
gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecisiongh pr checks --json name,state,bucket,description,linkgh run view --log-failedgh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/comments
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: getsentry
- Source: getsentry/skills
- License: Apache-2.0
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.