Install
$ agentstack add skill-gokulb20-crewm8-social-media-manager-skill-graph-content-pillars ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Content Pillars
Transform brand positioning into 3-5 repeatable content categories (pillars). Each pillar is a lens through which the brand talks about the world. The topic taxonomy underneath ensures the agent never runs out of specific, on-brand ideas.
Purpose
Without pillars, content is random. With pillars, every post has a job: educate, persuade, prove, humanize, or convert. Pillars make the content calendar fillable without creativity blocks, and they make the brand's feed feel cohesive instead of scattershot.
When to Use
- After positioning is locked, before the first calendar
- Content feels repetitive or scattered
- Quarterly strategy refresh
- Expanding to a new platform
- Founder says "I don't know what to post about"
Inputs Required
- Positioning statement (from
positioning-statementskill) - Brand voice guide (from
brand-voice-systemskill) - Customer interview insights or audience pain points
- Competitor content audit (what's working for them)
- Platform strategy (which platforms are active)
Quick Reference
| Pillar Type | Purpose | Example Topics | Best Formats | |-------------|---------|---------------|-------------| | Education / How-to | Teach something valuable | Frameworks, step-by-step guides, mistakes to avoid | Threads, carousels, how-to videos | | Point of View / Contrarian | Share a differentiated opinion | Hot takes, industry myths, "unpopular opinion" | Short posts, quote tweets, opinion threads | | Proof / Social Proof | Show the thing works | Case studies, results, revenue updates, customer stories | Metric-led posts, testimonial graphics | | Behind the Scenes / Build-in-Public | Humanize the brand | Team culture, process, failures, lessons learned, "how it's going" | Photo + caption, process videos, raw updates | | CTA / Conversion | Drive action | Product launches, demo requests, waitlists, newsletter signups | Launch posts, demo clips, link posts |
Procedure
- Start with the positioning statement. For each potential pillar, ask: "Does content in this pillar reinforce the brand's core message?" If the answer is "not really," that pillar doesn't belong.
- Define 3-5 pillars. Each pillar gets:
- A name (1-3 words)
- A one-sentence description of what content in this pillar does
- A target split (% of weekly output)
- 10-15 specific topic ideas (not templates — actual topics that could be posts)
- The target emotional response: do we want the reader to think, feel, or act?
- Map each pillar to the right formats:
- Education: threads, carousels, how-to videos, LinkedIn carousels
- POV: short takes, quote tweets, contrarian threads, LinkedIn opinion posts
- Proof: case study posts, metric screenshots, testimonial graphics, revenue update threads
- BTS: photo + caption, process videos, unfiltered updates, TikTok POV content
- CTA: launch announcements, link posts, demo clips, waitlist pages
- Map each pillar to the right platforms:
- Education dominates LinkedIn and X
- POV lives primarily on X (and occasionally LinkedIn)
- BTS thrives on IG Stories and TikTok
- Proof works everywhere but lands differently (metrics on X, stories on LinkedIn)
- CTA works where the audience already trusts you — earn it with other pillars first
- Define the pillar mix (recommended starting point, adjust per data):
- Education: 35% of weekly output
- POV: 25%
- Proof: 20%
- BTS: 15%
- CTA: 5% (you earn the right to ask)
- Build a 15-topic bank per pillar. Topics should be specific, not generic. Bad: "SaaS tips." Good: "Why charging monthly killed our growth (and what we switched to)."
- Set pillar health check rules:
- Any pillar exceeding 50% of weekly output? Rebalance.
- Any pillar with zero posts this week? Fill it.
- Any pillar consistently underperforming (below average ER for 3+ weeks)? Diagnose or retire.
Output Format
# [Brand] Content Pillars — [Date]
## Pillar 1: [Name]
**Goal:** [What this content achieves for the audience and the brand]
**Target split:** [X]% of weekly output
**Best formats:** [List 2-3]
**Platform priority:** [Platform A > Platform B > ...]
**Emotional target:** [Think / Feel / Act]
### Topic Bank (15 ideas)
1. [Specific, actionable topic]
2. [Specific, actionable topic]
...15
## Pillar 2: [Name]
...
## Pillar Mix Target
| Pillar | % of Weekly | X | LinkedIn | IG | TikTok |
|--------|------------|---|---|-----|--------|
| Education | 35% | Threads | Carousels | Carousels | How-tos |
| POV | 25% | Short posts | Opinion posts | — | Reaction videos |
| Proof | 20% | Metric posts | Case studies | Testimonials | — |
| BTS | 15% | Photo posts | — | Stories | POV clips |
| CTA | 5% | Launch posts | Demos | — | — |
## Pillar Health Check (Review Monthly)
- Which pillar drives the most engagement?
- Which pillar drives the most conversions?
- Which pillar is underrepresented or overperforming?
- Is any pillar below average ER for 3+ weeks? Diagnose.
Done Criteria
The skill is complete when:
- 3-5 pillars are defined with names, goals, and target splits
- Each pillar has 10-15 specific topic ideas (not generic categories)
- Each pillar is mapped to formats and platforms
- The pillar mix totals 100% and is actionable
- The health check rules are documented
Pitfalls
- More than 5 pillars dilutes everything — the audience can't tell what you stand for
- Pillars that are too broad ("Business Advice") are useless as a filter
- Same pillar mix on every platform (X is not LinkedIn is not TikTok)
- CTA content without scaffolding from other pillars (you can't ask before you give)
- Topic banks that run dry in 2 weeks (aim for 15 topics per pillar — that's 3 months of material before repeating)
Verification
Map the last 2 weeks of posts to pillars. If more than 20% don't fit any pillar, the taxonomy is wrong. If one pillar exceeds 50% of output, rebalance. Can you look at the topic bank and immediately write a post from any topic? If a topic makes you think "I have nothing to say about this," it's not specific enough.
Example
Input: SaaS analytics tool positioning = "Product analytics for B2B founders who hate dashboards."
Output:
- Pillar 1 (Education): "Product analytics that actually matter" — topics: 3 metrics that predict churn, why DAU is a vanity metric, how to set up your first retention cohort
- Pillar 2 (POV): "Unpopular analytics takes" — topics: why dashboard tools make worse decisions, the metric VCs care about that you're ignoring
- Pillar 3 (Proof): "Customer results" — topics: how [customer] reduced churn 40%, revenue impact of fixing onboarding drop-off
- Pillar 4 (BTS): "Building an analytics company" — topics: why we rebuilt our data pipeline, the feature customers begged for that we said no to
- Pillar 5 (CTA): "Try it" — topics: free trial launch, comparison vs. competitors, feature deep-dives
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: gokulb20
- Source: gokulb20/Crewm8-Social-Media-Manager-Skill-Graph
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://crewm8.ai
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.