Install
$ agentstack add skill-gokulb20-crewm8-social-media-manager-skill-graph-crisis-respond ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Crisis Respond
Detect and respond to negative social situations before they become crises. Speed and tone are everything — a well-handled complaint can build trust; an ignored or defensive response can cause reputational damage that takes months to undo.
Purpose
One hour is the difference between a contained complaint and a viral crisis. This skill triages situations, drafts appropriate responses, and knows exactly when to escalate to the founder.
When to Use
- Negative comment detected on brand post
- Spike in negative mentions
- Customer complaint goes public
- Founder or brand is being criticized
- Potential PR issue brewing
Inputs Required
- The triggering comment, mention, or DM
- Context (one-off or pattern)
- Brand voice guide (for tone calibration)
- Escalation contacts
Quick Reference
| Situation | Response | Escalate When | |-----------|---------|--------------| | Legitimate complaint | Acknowledge, empathize, move to private | High-value customer, technical issue, refund | | Fair criticism of content | Thank them, engage respectfully, no defensiveness | Criticism from influential voice | | Misunderstanding / error | Politely clarify with facts | Clarification might make it worse | | Troll / bad-faith | Do NOT engage. Hide/report if possible | Impersonating brand or spreading false claims | | Coordinated attack | Flag immediately. No individual responses. | Immediately to founder |
Procedure
- Detect via
mention-monitor,dm-respond, or manual feed check.
- Triage:
- Legitimate complaint or bad-faith?
- One-off or pattern?
- Worst-case scenario if it escalates?
- For legitimate complaints: Acknowledge first. Validate feeling. Offer path to resolution (DM/email). Keep first reply public (others see responsiveness).
- For trolls: Do not reply. Hide/block. Report if violating policies.
- For coordinated attacks: Escalate to founder immediately. Do not reply individually.
- Document every interaction: What triggered, what response, outcome, what to do differently.
Output Format
# Crisis Response: [Situation]
## Detection
**Time:** [Timestamp] | **Platform:** [X / LinkedIn / IG / TikTok]
**Source:** [Comment / DM / Mention / Coordinated]
**Trigger:** [What was said]
## Assessment
**Type:** [Complaint / Troll / Criticism / Attack / Misunderstanding]
**Severity:** [Low / Medium / High / Critical]
**Pattern:** [One-off / Recurring]
## Response
**Drafted reply:** [Full text, tone-calibrated]
**OR no response:** [Why]
## Escalation
**To founder:** [Yes / No]
**Founder briefing:** [Who, what, what's been done, what's needed]
## Monitoring
**Watch for:** [Volume, sentiment, media pickup]
**Check frequency:** [Every 30 min / 1 hour / 4 hours]
Done Criteria
The skill is complete when:
- Situation is triaged and categorized
- Response is drafted (or "no response" decision made)
- Escalation decision is clear
- Monitoring plan is set
Pitfalls
- Responding defensively (validates the complaint and escalates)
- Responding too slowly (4-hour-old complaint with 50 replies is harder to contain)
- Engaging with trolls (every reply is fuel)
- Deleting legitimate criticism (Streisand effect)
- Using corporate crisis language ("we take this matter seriously")
Verification
Read drafted response. Does it sound like a human who cares? Would the complainer feel heard? Is it short enough to not be screenshot-worthy? Has the founder been informed if needed?
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: gokulb20
- Source: gokulb20/Crewm8-Social-Media-Manager-Skill-Graph
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://crewm8.ai
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.