AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Percolate Kb

skill-hraness-slopcamera-percolate-kb · by hraness

Review a hraness/kb Markdown vault for recurring ideas and missing structural connections, then promote evidence-backed concepts and typed relationships with the KB CLI. Use after materially adding or revising notes, when organizing an accumulated vault, or when an agent needs to turn repeated tags and prose references into an explicit queryable knowledge graph.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
21 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-hraness-slopcamera-percolate-kb

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-hraness-slopcamera-percolate-kb)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 16d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Percolate Kb? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Percolate concepts and relationships

Keep the graph authored, local, and reviewable. kb percolate proposes candidates from deterministic evidence; it never changes a note. Backlinks, graph reports, and QMD results are derived views, while Markdown remains the authority.

Locate the vault

  • Resolve `` to the directory containing its authored or managed

index.md front door.

  • Read the applicable repository and vault instructions before editing.
  • Pass the resolved path to every --root.
  • Identify the note or small neighborhood changed by the current task. Prefer a

bounded review to a vault-wide cleanup during parallel work.

Inspect candidates

Run percolation on the changed note when possible:

kb percolate notes/example --root "$KB_ROOT" --limit 25 --json

Run it without a note only when reviewing the whole vault:

kb percolate --root "$KB_ROOT" --min-support 2 --limit 50 --json

Treat each result as a prompt to open the cited notes and read the relevant prose. Candidate kinds may include:

  • a recurring tag with no maintained type: concept note;
  • notes that share a concept or tag but have no explicit relationship;
  • an exact title or alias mentioned without a contextual link;
  • a self, reciprocal, malformed, broken, or ambiguous authored relationship.

For missing relationships, support counts independent shared tags or concept neighbors; the evidence array shows the participating notes. The default minimum of two therefore requires two shared signals, not merely both endpoints of one tag match. Other candidate kinds count their natural unit: supporting notes, mention occurrences, or authored hygiene evidence.

For a missing concept, use suggestedId. When collidesWith is non-null, the natural ID is already an ordinary note, so KB chooses an unoccupied *-concept ID. Read the occupied note before deciding whether to create the suggested concept or promote and improve the existing note instead.

Semantic search may help discover evidence, but similarity is never enough to author an edge.

Promote durable concepts

Create a concept only when the idea is likely to be reused and its definition can be stated from the source material:

kb note create notes/local-first \
  --root "$KB_ROOT" \
  --title "Local-first" \
  --type concept \
  --tag architecture \
  --body '# Local-first

A concise reviewed definition grounded in the cited notes.'

Write a concise definition and cite or link the notes that establish it. Concepts are ordinary Markdown notes, so they can carry aliases, evidence, context, and their own outbound relationships. Do not create a concept merely to mirror every tag.

After promotion, rerun percolation on the cited non-concept notes. The new concept may support relationships among its neighbors even when a run scoped to the concept itself has no candidate:

kb percolate notes/write-path --root "$KB_ROOT" --limit 25 --json

Author typed relationships

Add a relationship from the note that owns the assertion:

kb relation add notes/write-path supports notes/durable-agent-memory \
  --root "$KB_ROOT"

Use a specific lower-kebab-case predicate. Targets are exact vault-root note IDs without .md. Ground the assertion in nearby prose or evidence; the frontmatter is an indexable statement, not a substitute for explanation.

List or remove relationships without editing reciprocal notes:

kb relation list notes/write-path --root "$KB_ROOT" --json
kb relation remove notes/write-path supports notes/durable-agent-memory \
  --root "$KB_ROOT"

Never write inverse edges, generated backlinks, inferred transitive relationships, or semantic-search scores into Markdown. Those are derived views.

Query before concluding

Use exact structure to verify that the promoted graph says what the prose says:

kb links notes/write-path --root "$KB_ROOT" --direction both --depth 2 --json
kb relation list notes/write-path --root "$KB_ROOT" --json
kb graph --root "$KB_ROOT" --json

Prefer the note-scoped commands first. Use the whole-vault graph only when the question spans several neighborhoods, and confirm returned IDs against their Markdown notes before reporting a conclusion.

Finish under the vault's catalog mode

When working alone or integrating several lanes:

kb refresh --root "$KB_ROOT"
kb check --root "$KB_ROOT"

When several agents are editing different notes in a managed-catalog vault, each lane should validate authored structure and local attachments without rewriting the shared catalog:

kb check --root "$KB_ROOT" --no-catalog

The integrating agent runs one final managed refresh and normal check. In an authored-catalog vault, refresh and check leave the front door untouched, while kb catalog --root "$KB_ROOT" renders an exhaustive disposable inventory. Resolve same-note Git conflicts from the prose and evidence; do not accept one side's frontmatter mechanically.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.