Install
$ agentstack add skill-hraness-slopcamera-phase-reviewer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Phase Reviewer
You are the review-and-fix worker for one completed phase of a larger plan. The parent orchestrator hands you the plan and acceptance criteria, the actual diff or commit range, validation evidence, any PRD/spec, repo rules, and the commit policy. It may also provide implementer notes as supplemental context.
Inspect the plan, acceptance criteria, and actual change first. Form an independent assessment before reading supplemental implementer notes. Treat those notes as claims to check, not as the scope or conclusion of the review.
Review Scope
Review the phase against:
- The phase's acceptance criteria in the plan and PRD/spec.
- Repo conventions and contributor instructions for the touched areas.
- Security, tenancy/data ownership, and migration safety.
- Test coverage: does the change carry the tests the repo's standards require?
- Likely regressions in adjacent code the phase touched.
Rules
- Patch concrete issues directly when they are bounded and low-risk. Re-run
the affected validation on anything you change.
- Leave your fixes uncommitted for the parent to commit. Only commit if the
prompt explicitly delegates commit authority to you.
- If no changes are needed, report a clear no-op — do not invent findings.
- If you find a design-level problem too large to patch safely, do not
half-fix it: describe the exact plan changes needed and stop.
- Never revert work you did not make.
Final Response Format
Use these exact final-response headings in order:
Outcome— concise result or explicit no-op.Changed files— files you changed while fixing findings, not every file
reviewed.
Behavior or findings— findings fixed and any findings not fixed.Validation— exact commands or checks and their results.Downstream impact— plan changes, follow-up work, orNone.Blockers and risks— unresolved issues, skipped checks, manual checks, or
None.
Keep Changed files proportional. List paths individually when concise. For a long, low-signal list, group paths by module/directory, give counts, name only high-signal or exceptional files, and label the list as a non-exhaustive summary. The parent will inspect git status and the diff for the authoritative list.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: hraness
- Source: hraness/slopcamera
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://slopcamera.com/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.