AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Social Calendar

skill-inklate-social-skills-social-calendar · by inklate

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-inklate-social-skills-social-calendar

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-inklate-social-skills-social-calendar)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
23d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Social Calendar? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Build a realistic 2-week content plan from the user's pillars, platforms, and honest cadence — a plan, not a scheduler.

Context

Read social-context.md at the project root (also check .agents/social-context.md) for the ## Voice, ## Pillars, ## Platforms, ## Audience, ## Cadence, and ## Goals sections. If the file is missing, offer to run the social-context skill first, but don't block — ask 2–3 quick inline questions and proceed:

  • What are your 2–4 content pillars?
  • Which platforms, and which one matters most?
  • How many posts per week have you actually sustained in the last month?

Workflow

  1. Confirm cadence reality before anything else. Take the number in ## Cadence at face value — it's the user's honest count, so respect it. If the user asks for more volume than their stated cadence ("give me daily posts" when cadence says 3/week), push back once, explicitly: an unrealistic calendar is worse than none, because missed slots train the user to ignore the whole plan. Plan to the cadence they will actually keep, or to a new number they re-confirm out loud.
  2. Fix the date range. Two weeks starting from the next natural posting day — usually tomorrow, or the coming Monday if today is late in the week. Ask about timezone only if an anchor date makes it genuinely ambiguous.
  3. Collect anchors. Ask whether anything real lands in the window: a launch, event, webinar, release, or a holiday their audience actually observes. Anchored content is placed first; the rest of the plan flows around it. Anything significant gets a small arc, not a single slot:
  • one warm-up post 2–4 days before (tease the problem, not the announcement),
  • the anchor-day post itself,
  • one follow-through 1–3 days after (result, lesson, or behind-the-scenes).
  1. Distribute pillars. Spread pillars across the slots so no pillar appears twice in a row on the same platform, and no pillar exceeds ~40% of total slots unless the user says one pillar deliberately dominates. Weight the mix toward the primary goal from ## Goals — lead-gen tilts to pillars that show the product working; awareness and authority tilt to opinion and teaching. If they have 4+ pillars and few slots, don't shave every pillar to one token post — bench the weakest pillar for this fortnight and tell them which one and why.
  2. Distribute formats. Rotate the formats each platform actually supports, and match format to pillar — teaching content suits threads, carousels, and document posts; opinion and story content suits single text posts:
  • LinkedIn: text post, document/carousel post, image post
  • X: single post, thread, image post
  • Instagram: carousel, Reel idea, single image
  • Threads / Bluesky: short text post, small thread
  • Facebook: text post, image post, link post

Never assign a format the platform doesn't support, and never let one platform run a single format for the whole fortnight.

  1. Write a working title or hook for every slot. Not a topic label — an actual first line the user could open with. "Why we killed our best feature" beats "product lessons". If the brand voice is in context, write hooks in that voice; if a Never-list exists, honor it here too.
  2. Reserve reactive slack. Leave roughly 20% of slots — at least 2 across the fortnight — labelled reactive with no assigned topic. These absorb trending conversations, a reply that deserves to become a post, and news in the user's niche. Say this explicitly in the plan notes so the user reads them as capacity, not gaps.
  3. Sequence for energy, not neatness. Front-load week 1 with the strongest hooks — early wins keep the plan alive. Put heavy-prep formats (carousel, long thread) on days the user likely has time; ask if you don't know. If one idea suits two platforms, stagger it 1–3 days apart with a reworked hook — never a same-day copy-paste.
  4. Do a final realism pass. Before presenting, check the plan against every row of the Quality bar — volume, pillar spacing (including the ~40% cap), format mix, hooks, slack, anchors, and cross-posting stagger. Cut before you cram — a 9-slot plan the user completes beats a 14-slot plan they abandon.
  5. Offer, but don't produce unprompted, an .ics export. If the user wants calendar entries, generate a .ics file with one all-day event per slot titled [platform] hook, so the plan lands in whatever calendar they already look at.

Quality bar

| Check | Constraint | | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Volume | Matches stated cadence exactly — never exceeds it | | Pillar spacing | No pillar twice in a row per platform; no pillar > ~40% of slots | | Format mix | At least 2 distinct formats per platform across the fortnight | | Hooks | Every slot has a usable first line, not a topic label | | Slack | ~20% of slots marked reactive, minimum 2 | | Anchors | Every user-mentioned date has a slot; big ones get a warm-up and follow-through | | Cross-posting | Same idea on two platforms is staggered 1–3 days with a reworked hook |

Every hook must pass the "would I stop scrolling?" test — specific, concrete, carrying a claim or tension:

| Fails | Passes | | -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | | "Thoughts on productivity" | "I tracked every meeting for 30 days. 11 hours were pure theater." | | "Our launch story" | "We launched to 4 signups. Here's the email that turned it around." | | "Tips for founders" | "The advice that cost us six months: 'talk to more users.'" |

Deliverable

A markdown table with columns Date | Platform | Pillar | Format | Working title / hook | Status, every row's status set to idea. For example:

| Date | Platform | Pillar | Format | Working title / hook | Status | | ---------- | -------- | --------------- | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------ | | Mon Jul 20 | LinkedIn | Build-in-public | Text post | "We shipped the wrong feature first. On purpose." | idea | | Tue Jul 21 | X | Teaching | Thread | "7 pricing-page mistakes I keep seeing (with fixes):" | idea | | Wed Jul 22 | X | — | — | reactive | idea |

Below the table, a short Notes section covering: the cadence you planned and why, which pillar (if any) was benched, and how to use the reactive slots. Offer the .ics export as an option. This is a plan for the user to execute themselves — hand it back and stop.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.