Install
$ agentstack add skill-inklate-social-skills-social-calendar ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Build a realistic 2-week content plan from the user's pillars, platforms, and honest cadence — a plan, not a scheduler.
Context
Read social-context.md at the project root (also check .agents/social-context.md) for the ## Voice, ## Pillars, ## Platforms, ## Audience, ## Cadence, and ## Goals sections. If the file is missing, offer to run the social-context skill first, but don't block — ask 2–3 quick inline questions and proceed:
- What are your 2–4 content pillars?
- Which platforms, and which one matters most?
- How many posts per week have you actually sustained in the last month?
Workflow
- Confirm cadence reality before anything else. Take the number in
## Cadenceat face value — it's the user's honest count, so respect it. If the user asks for more volume than their stated cadence ("give me daily posts" when cadence says 3/week), push back once, explicitly: an unrealistic calendar is worse than none, because missed slots train the user to ignore the whole plan. Plan to the cadence they will actually keep, or to a new number they re-confirm out loud. - Fix the date range. Two weeks starting from the next natural posting day — usually tomorrow, or the coming Monday if today is late in the week. Ask about timezone only if an anchor date makes it genuinely ambiguous.
- Collect anchors. Ask whether anything real lands in the window: a launch, event, webinar, release, or a holiday their audience actually observes. Anchored content is placed first; the rest of the plan flows around it. Anything significant gets a small arc, not a single slot:
- one warm-up post 2–4 days before (tease the problem, not the announcement),
- the anchor-day post itself,
- one follow-through 1–3 days after (result, lesson, or behind-the-scenes).
- Distribute pillars. Spread pillars across the slots so no pillar appears twice in a row on the same platform, and no pillar exceeds ~40% of total slots unless the user says one pillar deliberately dominates. Weight the mix toward the primary goal from
## Goals— lead-gen tilts to pillars that show the product working; awareness and authority tilt to opinion and teaching. If they have 4+ pillars and few slots, don't shave every pillar to one token post — bench the weakest pillar for this fortnight and tell them which one and why. - Distribute formats. Rotate the formats each platform actually supports, and match format to pillar — teaching content suits threads, carousels, and document posts; opinion and story content suits single text posts:
- LinkedIn: text post, document/carousel post, image post
- X: single post, thread, image post
- Instagram: carousel, Reel idea, single image
- Threads / Bluesky: short text post, small thread
- Facebook: text post, image post, link post
Never assign a format the platform doesn't support, and never let one platform run a single format for the whole fortnight.
- Write a working title or hook for every slot. Not a topic label — an actual first line the user could open with. "Why we killed our best feature" beats "product lessons". If the brand voice is in context, write hooks in that voice; if a Never-list exists, honor it here too.
- Reserve reactive slack. Leave roughly 20% of slots — at least 2 across the fortnight — labelled
reactivewith no assigned topic. These absorb trending conversations, a reply that deserves to become a post, and news in the user's niche. Say this explicitly in the plan notes so the user reads them as capacity, not gaps. - Sequence for energy, not neatness. Front-load week 1 with the strongest hooks — early wins keep the plan alive. Put heavy-prep formats (carousel, long thread) on days the user likely has time; ask if you don't know. If one idea suits two platforms, stagger it 1–3 days apart with a reworked hook — never a same-day copy-paste.
- Do a final realism pass. Before presenting, check the plan against every row of the Quality bar — volume, pillar spacing (including the ~40% cap), format mix, hooks, slack, anchors, and cross-posting stagger. Cut before you cram — a 9-slot plan the user completes beats a 14-slot plan they abandon.
- Offer, but don't produce unprompted, an .ics export. If the user wants calendar entries, generate a
.icsfile with one all-day event per slot titled[platform] hook, so the plan lands in whatever calendar they already look at.
Quality bar
| Check | Constraint | | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Volume | Matches stated cadence exactly — never exceeds it | | Pillar spacing | No pillar twice in a row per platform; no pillar > ~40% of slots | | Format mix | At least 2 distinct formats per platform across the fortnight | | Hooks | Every slot has a usable first line, not a topic label | | Slack | ~20% of slots marked reactive, minimum 2 | | Anchors | Every user-mentioned date has a slot; big ones get a warm-up and follow-through | | Cross-posting | Same idea on two platforms is staggered 1–3 days with a reworked hook |
Every hook must pass the "would I stop scrolling?" test — specific, concrete, carrying a claim or tension:
| Fails | Passes | | -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | | "Thoughts on productivity" | "I tracked every meeting for 30 days. 11 hours were pure theater." | | "Our launch story" | "We launched to 4 signups. Here's the email that turned it around." | | "Tips for founders" | "The advice that cost us six months: 'talk to more users.'" |
Deliverable
A markdown table with columns Date | Platform | Pillar | Format | Working title / hook | Status, every row's status set to idea. For example:
| Date | Platform | Pillar | Format | Working title / hook | Status | | ---------- | -------- | --------------- | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------ | | Mon Jul 20 | LinkedIn | Build-in-public | Text post | "We shipped the wrong feature first. On purpose." | idea | | Tue Jul 21 | X | Teaching | Thread | "7 pricing-page mistakes I keep seeing (with fixes):" | idea | | Wed Jul 22 | X | — | — | reactive | idea |
Below the table, a short Notes section covering: the cadence you planned and why, which pillar (if any) was benched, and how to use the reactive slots. Offer the .ics export as an option. This is a plan for the user to execute themselves — hand it back and stop.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: inklate
- Source: inklate/social-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://inklate.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.