AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Rams Generator

skill-jody09-dotcom-constructionx-skills-rams-generator · by Jody09-dotcom

Draft a UK construction Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS) from a task description. Use when the user asks for "RAMS", "risk assessment", "method statement", "draft a RAMS for [task]", or needs a working RAMS draft before a competent-person review. Covers hazard identification, 5x5 risk matrix, control measures, PPE, sign-off block. Aligned to HSE 5-step risk assessment.

No reviews yet
0 installs
9 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-jody09-dotcom-constructionx-skills-rams-generator

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-jody09-dotcom-constructionx-skills-rams-generator)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Rams Generator? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

RAMS Generator

This skill drafts a UK Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS) from a task description. It is aligned to the HSE 5-step risk assessment approach and uses a 5x5 risk matrix. The output is a working draft. A competent person must review and approve before the RAMS is issued, filed, or used to authorise work.

When to Use

  • New task or method coming up on site and you need a first draft
  • Subcontractor RAMS submission, draft before a detailed review
  • Client or principal contractor submittal, first pass
  • Updating an existing RAMS after a change in method or circumstances

This skill does NOT file the RAMS, does NOT replace professional judgement, and does NOT produce an approved document.

Workflow

Phase 1, gather inputs.

Ask the user for the following. If anything is missing, ask one short follow-up, do not guess.

  • Task description (what is being done)
  • Location (site, area, elevation if working at height)
  • Operatives (how many, trade, any subbie firm names)
  • Equipment and materials used
  • Duration (hours, shifts, duration of the phase)
  • Access method (ladders, tower scaffold, MEWP, stairs)
  • Environmental factors (weather exposure, dust, noise, confined space, live services, public nearby)

Phase 2, identify hazards.

Consult references/common-construction-hazards.md. Pick every hazard that applies to the task. If a hazard is borderline, include it. It is easier for the competent-person reviewer to strike a line than to add one.

Phase 3, score risks.

For each hazard, score the inherent risk before controls using references/hse-risk-matrix.md, 5x5, Likelihood 1 to 5 times Severity 1 to 5. Band the score as Low (1-6), Medium (8-12), or High (15-25).

After the control measures, also score the residual risk. Both scores go in the hazard table.

Phase 4, propose controls using the hierarchy of control.

For each hazard, apply controls in this order:

  1. Eliminate the hazard (can the task be done another way that removes the hazard entirely)
  2. Substitute (lower-risk material, method, or tool)
  3. Engineering controls (guards, ventilation, bunds, edge protection)
  4. Administrative controls (permits, training, sequencing, exclusion zones)
  5. PPE (last line of defence)

Phase 5, produce the RAMS document.

Use the output template below. Include a sign-off block. Save as markdown to a user-specified path, default rams/{task-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md.

Output Template

# Risk Assessment and Method Statement

**Task:** {Task description}
**Location:** {Site, area}
**Date prepared:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Prepared by:** {Name (drafted by AI, for competent-person review)}
**Reference:** {RAMS number or "TBC"}

## Scope

{One paragraph. What is being done, where, by whom, over what duration.}

## Operatives

| Role | Number | Trade / Firm | Competency / Training |
|------|--------|--------------|------------------------|
| ...  | ...    | ...          | ...                    |

## Equipment and Materials

- {item}
- ...

## Access Method

{Ladders / MEWP / tower scaffold / stairs / etc. Include inspection requirements.}

## Hazards and Risks

| # | Hazard | Who at risk | Inherent L | S | Score | Band | Controls (hierarchy) | Residual L | S | Score | Band |
|---|--------|-------------|------------|---|-------|------|----------------------|------------|---|-------|------|
| 1 | ...    | ...         | ...        |...| ...   | ...  | ...                  | ...        |...| ...   | ...  |

## Method Statement, Step by Step

1. {pre-task check, permits, isolations}
2. {setup and access}
3. {execution, step by step}
4. {quality checks}
5. {tidy-down and handover}

## Emergency Procedures

- First aid: {named first aider, location of kit}
- Fire: {nearest extinguisher, muster point}
- Incident: {report to site manager, call 999 if required, record in diary, RIDDOR if applicable}
- Spill or environmental release: {containment, reporting}

## PPE

Mandatory: hard hat, high-vis, safety boots, gloves, eye protection.
Task-specific: {e.g. FFP3 mask for dust, hearing protection for noise >80dB, harness and lanyard for height}.

## Sign-Off

| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|------|------|-----------|------|
| Prepared by | | | |
| Reviewed by (competent person) | | | |
| Approved by | | | |
| Briefed to operatives | | | |

Operatives briefed (print name, sign):

| Name | Signature | Date |
|------|-----------|------|
| ...  | ...       | ...  |

References

  • references/hse-risk-matrix.md, 5x5 matrix and banding
  • references/common-construction-hazards.md, hazard library with standard controls

Disclaimer

This is an AI-generated draft. A competent person must review and approve before the RAMS is issued, filed, or used to authorise work. The skill does not replace professional judgement. The RAMS is not valid until signed off by a competent person under your own company's procedures. HSE guidance (INDG163 and the Construction pages) is the authoritative source for UK risk assessment practice.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.