AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Cognitive Ux Health

skill-kfeng209-oss-cognitive-ux-cognitive-ux-health · by kfeng209-oss

Design and audit health-information, patient-portal, appointment, refill, and care-communication websites using evidence-informed UX. Use when people need to understand care information or manage care; return health-literacy structure, uncertainty/provenance rules, task flows, privacy and escalation design, accessible support, and representative patient/caregiver validation.

No reviews yet
0 installs
2 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kfeng209-oss-cognitive-ux-cognitive-ux-health

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Cognitive Ux Health? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Cognitive UX: Health & Patient

Scope

Use for patient-facing health experiences. It does not create clinical guidance or establish medical, privacy, or legal compliance.

Intake

  • Identify patient/caregiver tasks, health literacy, language, disability, emotional context, and urgency.
  • Identify clinical owner, source/review date, uncertainty, emergency/escalation policy, and privacy constraints.
  • Identify appointment, refill, results, messaging, sharing, proxy access, and support limitations.

State assumptions that could change the design. Define the primary task, its consequence of failure, and a measurable user outcome before proposing a layout.

Design procedure

  1. Start with a plain-language summary; separate factual information, uncertainty, next steps, and emergency/escalation guidance.
  2. Make authorship, clinical review, source, date, and update status visible for consequential health content.
  3. Design results, messages, appointments, refills, and proxy access with clear status and support paths; do not imply a message is monitored in an emergency.
  4. Use accessible language, captions/transcripts, keyboard operation, and alternatives for high cognitive or sensory load.
  5. Require clinical, privacy, legal, and representative patient/caregiver review before release.

Read [archetype evidence](references/archetype-evidence.md). Label each non-obvious recommendation Standard / requirement, Evidence-informed default, or Hypothesis to test.

Required outputs

  • health-literacy and content-provenance model
  • patient task/status/escalation flow
  • privacy/proxy/accessibility checklist
  • clinical-review and uncertainty disclosure plan
  • patient/caregiver comprehension and task study
  • Evidence-to-decision table: decision → mechanism → source → label → limitation → test metric.
  • Accessibility, ethics, and recovery-path checklist.

Guardrails

Do not diagnose, overstate certainty, hide emergency limitations, expose health data unnecessarily, or call UX testing a substitute for clinical validation.

Related skills

Use cognitive-ux-portal, cognitive-ux-booking, and cognitive-ux-forms. Select the primary task before combining skills; add a secondary skill only when it changes the user outcome or risk.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.