AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Phd Proposal

skill-kinhluan-skills-phd-proposal · by kinhluan

Write, structure, or review a PhD/Master's research proposal. Use when drafting a research proposal, preparing for committee review, writing a thesis outline, or aligning methodology with academic requirements.

No reviews yet
0 installs
8 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kinhluan-skills-phd-proposal

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Phd Proposal? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

PhD/Master's Research Proposal

Structure and write a rigorous research proposal that satisfies committee requirements.

Standard Proposal Structure (IEEE/ACM CS)

1. Title & Abstract          (~200 words)
2. Introduction              (~500 words)
3. Related Work              (~800 words)
4. Research Questions        (~200 words)
5. Methodology               (~1000 words) ← most important
6. Preliminary Results       (~500 words, if any)
7. Timeline & Milestones     (table/Gantt)
8. Expected Contributions    (~300 words)
9. References                (BibTeX)

Section-by-Section Guidance

1. Title & Abstract

Title formula: [Method/Approach] for [Problem] in [Domain/Context] Example: "Federated Multi-Level Feedback Queue Scheduling for Resource-Constrained Healthcare IoT Networks"

Abstract (one paragraph, no citations, no math):

[Context]: In [domain], [background challenge].
[Gap]: However, [specific gap from literature].
[Approach]: We propose [method name], which [key idea].
[Validation]: We evaluate on [datasets/benchmarks] using [metrics].
[Impact]: Results show [expected outcome], enabling [application].

2. Introduction

  • Hook: real-world motivation (1 paragraph)
  • Background: what exists (1 paragraph)
  • Problem: specific gap (1 paragraph)
  • Solution sketch: your approach (1 paragraph)
  • Contributions: bulleted list (use research-question output)
  • Thesis structure: "Chapter 2 covers..."

3. Related Work

Organize by taxonomy (not chronologically):

3.1 [Approach A] — summarize 3-5 papers, explain why insufficient
3.2 [Approach B] — same
3.3 [Your positioning] — "Unlike X, we address Y by Z"

4. Research Questions

  • State main RQ + 2-4 sub-questions (paste from research-question skill output)
  • Each sub-question should be answerable in ~1 chapter/paper

5. Methodology (Most Critical)

5.1 Research Paradigm Choose and justify:

  • Quantitative / Qualitative / Mixed
  • Paradigm: Design Science Research (DSR) / Experimental / Simulation

5.2 System/Model Design

Input: [what]
Processing: [how — algorithm, model, framework]
Output: [what]
Assumption: [what you assume]

5.3 Experimental Protocol

Datasets: [name, size, source, why chosen]
Baselines: [method1, method2 — why these are fair comparisons]
Metrics: [primary metric] + [secondary metrics]
Evaluation protocol: [k-fold CV / train-val-test split / simulation rounds]
Statistical tests: [t-test / Wilcoxon / effect size — for significance]

5.4 Reproducibility Plan

  • Code: GitHub repo (public after publication)
  • Environment: Docker / conda environment file
  • Seeds: fixed random seeds
  • Hardware: specify GPU/CPU specs

6. Preliminary Results

Include if you have any early experiments. Even partial results strengthen the proposal.

  • 1-2 preliminary experiments showing feasibility
  • Small-scale validation of core idea
  • If none: state "Preliminary experiments are planned for Month 3-4"

7. Timeline & Milestones

For a 2-year Master's program (align with milestone-tracker skill):

| Phase | Activity | Duration | Milestone | |-------|----------|----------|-----------| | 1 | Literature review | Month 1-2 | Gap matrix complete | | 2 | Method design | Month 2-4 | Architecture finalized | | 3 | Implementation | Month 3-8 | Working prototype | | 4 | Experiments | Month 7-14 | Results table complete | | 5 | Writing | Month 13-18 | Draft thesis/paper | | 6 | Revision | Month 17-21 | Submission ready | | 7 | Defense | Month 22-23 | Defended ✓ |

8. Expected Contributions

Restate from research-question skill, add:

  • Theoretical contribution (if any)
  • Practical contribution (system, dataset, tool)
  • Publication targets (venues + tier)

Committee Checklist

Before submitting proposal for committee review:

  • [ ] Problem is clearly stated in 1-2 sentences
  • [ ] Gap is supported by ≥3 recent papers
  • [ ] RQ is specific and measurable
  • [ ] Methodology is detailed enough to replicate
  • [ ] Baselines are state-of-the-art, fairly chosen
  • [ ] Timeline is realistic (pad 20% for delays)
  • [ ] Limitations are acknowledged
  • [ ] Ethical considerations addressed (IRB, data privacy)

Output Format

Produce a structured Markdown document following the section order above. Export to LaTeX using the paper-writing skill templates.

Links to Other Skills

  • Requires → sota-survey + research-question
  • Feeds into → research-design (methodology details)
  • Feeds into → milestone-tracker (timeline)
  • Feeds into → paper-writing (proposal becomes thesis chapters)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.