AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Blog

skill-kriscard-skills-blog · by kriscard

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
40 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kriscard-skills-blog

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-kriscard-skills-blog)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Blog? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Blog Post Writer

Writing for developers who've read too much mediocre content. The goal is one "aha moment" the reader will actually share.

Writing Philosophy

One insight, clearly stated, well supported. Not a survey. Not a tutorial in disguise. Not "here's everything I know about X."

The test: can you describe the post in one sentence that makes someone say "oh, I've been doing that wrong"? If not, the angle isn't sharp enough yet.

Workflow

1. Research (if topic provided)

Before drafting, check the current state:

  • Use Context7 for library/framework documentation (catches outdated advice)
  • Use WebSearch for recent discussions, benchmarks, or counterarguments
  • Find 2-3 concrete examples or data points that support the insight

2. Identify Post Type

| Type | Use When | |------|----------| | Tutorial | Step-by-step instructions | | Project Showcase | Sharing what you built | | Opinion | Your take on a topic | | TIL | Quick, focused insight | | Comparison | X vs Y analysis |

3. Draft Outline First

Present the outline before writing the full post. Get explicit approval. Map to the Story Circle narrative:

Title: [specific and direct — avoid "A Guide to X" or "Everything about X"]
Hook: [why this matters right now — 1-2 sentences]
Tension: [the common mistake or misconception — reader nods, feels called out]
Resolution: [the insight with evidence]
Code example: [the concrete thing they can use today]
Takeaway: [one sentence they'll remember]

Story Circle mapping (for longer posts): You (reader's situation) → Need (problem) → Go (decision to change) → Search (exploring) → Find (the insight) → Take (implementation) → Return (results) → Change (reader transforms).

4. Write the Full Draft

Follow the approved outline. Writing rules:

Voice and tone:

  • First-person, direct, no corporate hedging ("it may be worth considering" → "do this")
  • Short paragraphs — 3 sentences max before a break
  • Specific over vague ("200ms slower" not "noticeably slower")
  • Don't explain things the reader already knows — they're developers

What to kill:

  • "In this post, I will..." — start with the interesting part
  • "As we can see..." — if it needs pointing out, the code isn't clear enough
  • "Simply" / "just" / "easy" — condescending and often wrong
  • Passive voice for user actions — "you call" not "it is called"
  • Throat-clearing in the intro — get to the hook in sentence one

Code examples:

  • Must be runnable and focused on the key insight (not a complete app)
  • Show the wrong way, then the right way — the contrast is what teaches
  • Keep them under 20 lines unless the length itself is the point
  • Include the import/setup only if it's non-obvious

Post Structure

Hook — why this matters now. A failing production story, a surprising benchmark, a question the reader can't answer yet. Makes them commit to reading.

Tension — the common mistake. "Most people do X. Here's why that's wrong." This is where readers nod and feel called out.

Resolution — the insight with evidence. Code, benchmarks, or examples. Not just the conclusion — the reasoning that makes it stick.

Takeaway — one actionable thing they can do today: a code snippet, a mental model, a decision they can make differently.

SEO Checklist

Before delivering any draft, run:

  • [ ] Primary keyword in title and first paragraph
  • [ ] Meta description (150-160 chars)
  • [ ] URL slug is short and clean
  • [ ] 2-3 internal/external links
  • [ ] Code blocks specify language
  • [ ] Headings use proper hierarchy (H2, H3)

SEO should be subtle — don't keyword-stuff or write for search engines over humans.

Output

  1. Outline (wait for approval)
  2. Full draft with:
  • Suggested title (direct and specific)
  • Body with code examples
  • One-sentence ending that lands the insight
  • SEO metadata (description, keywords)

Estimated length: 800-1500 words. Longer only if the insight requires it.

References

| Priority | Stage | Load when | Reference | |----------|-------|-----------|-----------| | 1 | Outline | Choosing post type, narrative arc, or story structure | references/story-circle.md | | 2 | Draft | Need a concrete post format or section structure to follow | references/post-templates.md | | 3 | Review | Voice, tone, or style questions | references/voice-tone.md | | 4 | Publish | SEO metadata, keyword placement, or URL structure | references/seo-checklist.md |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.