AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Explain

skill-kv0906-pm-kit-explain · by kv0906

Break down complex concepts (math, models, systems, terminology) into first-principles explanations. Use when user says "explain", "break this down", "first principles", "ELI5", or pastes a formula/model/system to understand.

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-kv0906-pm-kit-explain

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-kv0906-pm-kit-explain)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Explain? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Explain — First Principles Concept Breaker

Reverse-engineer complex concepts into natural language. No jargon. Start from the end result and work backwards to raw inputs.

Input format: /explain [concept, formula, model, or paste]

What You Do

Take any complex input — math formula, scoring model, system design, methodology, technical concept — and explain it so a beginner can explain it back.

Input

User provides:

  • A math problem, equation, methodology, scoring system, model, or abstract concept
  • Optional: context of what it's used for (finance, physics, prediction markets, etc.)

Reasoning Process (follow in order)

Work through these steps internally before writing the explanation:

A. Find the End Goal — What is the final output? Translate it to a real-world result (money, score, probability, decision, ranking).

B. Find the Inputs — What raw information goes in? Translate each to real-world meaning.

C. Find How Value Is Earned — What actions/factors increase the result? What decreases it?

D. Find Comparisons — Does the model compare things? (person vs person, side vs side, time vs time). Explain as "share of total" or "relative contribution".

E. Find Rules and Boundaries — Minimums, maximums, penalties, special cases. Explain why each exists.

F. Find Time/Repetition — If the model samples repeatedly, explain as "measured many times and added up over time."

G. Find What Breaks Without Each Piece — For each major component, ask: what goes wrong if we remove this? This reveals WHY it exists.

Output Structure

Write these sections in order:

1. What This Produces

One sentence: what the final output represents in real life.

2. What Controls It

List the real-world factors that push the result up or down. No symbols.

3. Reverse Walkthrough (End → Beginning)

Start from the final result. Walk backwards through each layer until reaching raw inputs. Each step should answer: "where does THIS come from?"

4. What Each Part Measures (and Why)

For each component:

  • What it measures in plain language
  • Why it exists (what breaks without it)
  • What behavior it rewards or punishes

5. Rules of the Game

Rewrite the entire model as a rulebook using "If you do X, then Y happens" statements. No math.

6. Concrete Example

Small example with simple numbers. Show how changing one input changes the outcome.

7. One-Paragraph Summary

Compress everything into one short paragraph a beginner could repeat back.

Style Rules

  • Short sentences. Natural wording.
  • No symbols unless user insists.
  • No jargon: avoid "quadratic", "normalization", "distribution", "convex", "derivative", "expectation", "linear regression" etc.
  • When jargon is unavoidable, immediately follow with a plain restatement: "normalization — meaning we shrink everything to fit on the same scale"
  • Use everyday metaphors: sharing a pie, scoring a game, competition ranking, filling a bucket.
  • Prioritize meaning over calculation.
  • Write to a file in docs/ when output exceeds 20 lines (per vault conventions).

Fail-Safes

If the input is ambiguous or missing definitions:

  • Make the best interpretation
  • State assumptions explicitly
  • Still explain the likely intent

Success Criteria

Your explanation succeeds if:

  • A beginner can explain the system back to you
  • The user knows what actions increase/decrease results
  • The user understands why each major piece exists (not just what it does)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.