Install
$ agentstack add skill-serhiikorniienko-bullshit-detector-explain ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
explain
Make the content understandable without dumbing it down dishonestly.
Workflow
- Get the text (via
fetch-contentskill script if it's a URL, else web fetch or paste). - Pick the depth — from the user's request, or ask one short question if genuinely unclear:
- ELI5 — analogies, zero jargon, the core mechanism only
- Practitioner — assumes general technical literacy, focuses on how it works and what to do with it
- Deep dive — mechanisms, edge cases, history, competing views
- Explain, structured as:
- The one-sentence version first
- The mechanism: how it actually works, step by step
- Glossary: every jargon term the content uses without defining, one line each
- What the content assumes you know — the missing prerequisites that made it confusing
- Where the content's own explanation is wrong or oversimplified, if it is — flag it, don't repeat it
Rules
- Explaining ≠ endorsing. If the content's claim is contested, present the explanation and note the contest ("the video asserts X; the standard view is Y").
- Analogies must survive scrutiny — say where the analogy breaks.
- If the user points at a specific segment ("the part at 12:30", "section 3"), explain that segment in the context of the whole, not in isolation.
- Don't pad: a concept that takes three sentences gets three sentences.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: SerhiiKorniienko
- Source: SerhiiKorniienko/bullshit-detector
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://korniienko.dev/newsletter
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.