Install
$ agentstack add skill-liqiongyu-lenny-skills-plus-ai-product-strategy ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
AI Product Strategy
Scope
Covers
- Defining an executable product strategy for an AI/LLM/agent product or AI feature portfolio
- Translating AI uncertainty (non-determinism, emergent risks) into an empirical plan with evals + instrumentation
- Choosing product form factor (assistant vs copilot vs agent), autonomy boundaries, and a safety/security posture
- Setting kill criteria so you know when to pivot or stop investing
- Producing a strategy pack leaders and teams can use to align and execute
When to use
- "Define our AI product strategy / LLM strategy / agent strategy."
- "Prioritize AI use cases and turn them into an AI roadmap."
- "We're adding AI to an existing product—what should we build and how do we measure it?"
- "We want to ship an agent; define autonomy, security, and rollout."
- "Should we keep investing in our AI feature, or kill it?"
When NOT to use
- You need to build/implement an LLM system (RAG pipeline, prompt engineering, tool use) → use
building-with-llms. - You need to evaluate a specific AI vendor or tool (Claude vs GPT, build vs buy for one tool) → use
evaluating-new-technology. - You need to design an AI platform for third-party developers (APIs, ecosystem, marketplace) → use
platform-strategy. - You need to rapidly prototype an AI demo/proof-of-concept → use
vibe-coding. - You need a long-term product/company vision → use
defining-product-visionfirst. - You need deep competitor research, battlecards, or win/loss → use
competitive-analysis. - You need a feature-level PRD/spec/design doc → use
writing-prds/writing-specs-designsafter strategy. - You don't yet have a clear problem/ICP hypothesis → use
problem-definition/conducting-user-interviews.
Inputs
Minimum required
- Product context (what exists today) + target customer/user + their job/pain
- Strategy horizon (default: 3–12 months) + constraints (budget, latency, policy/legal, data access, platform)
- Intended AI surface and scope: assistant / copilot / agent; where it lives in the workflow
- Success metrics (1–3) and guardrails (2–5), including safety/trust, cost, and latency
Missing-info strategy
- Ask up to 5 questions from [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md) (3–5 at a time).
- If details remain missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 options (use-case focus, autonomy level, build/buy).
Outputs (deliverables)
Produce an AI Product Strategy Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested), in this order:
1) Context snapshot (decision, users, constraints, why now) 2) Strategy thesis (value prop, why-now, differentiation, non-goals) 3) Use-case portfolio (prioritized opportunities with feasibility + risk) 4) Autonomy policy (assistant→copilot→agent boundaries + human control points) 5) System plan (build/buy, data plan, eval plan, cost/latency budgets) 6) Empirical learning plan (experiments, instrumentation, iteration cadence) 7) Roadmap (phases, milestones, exit criteria, owners) 8) Kill criteria (when to pivot or stop; sunk-cost guardrails) 9) Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)
Templates: [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md)
Quick mode: If the user needs a lightweight strategy (single feature, early exploration, or time-boxed to hasn't reached X after Y weeks, we stop/pivot."
- Run [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and score with [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md).
- Always add Risks / Open questions / Next steps.
- Outputs: Final AI Product Strategy Pack.
- Checks: A stakeholder can act on the pack without a meeting; trade-offs and unknowns are explicit; there's a clear "what would make us stop."
Quality gate (required)
- Use [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md).
- Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.
Examples
Example 1 (AI-first product): "Use ai-product-strategy to define strategy for an AI coding assistant for mid-market engineering teams. Constraints: ship a beta in 8 weeks; must not leak proprietary code; budget capped at $X/month." Expected: strategy thesis + prioritized use cases + autonomy policy + system/eval plan + roadmap + kill criteria.
Example 2 (AI feature portfolio): "Use ai-product-strategy to prioritize AI opportunities for a customer support platform. Decide copilot vs agent, include safety posture, and propose a 2-quarter roadmap." Expected: use-case portfolio with 1–3 bets, a clear agency-control policy, empirical plan, and phased roadmap with exit criteria.
Example 3 (Quick mode): "I have 30 minutes—give me a lightweight AI strategy for adding summarization to our internal wiki." Expected: context snapshot + 3–5 use cases scored in a table + phased roadmap + risks/next steps. Note that autonomy policy and system plan were skipped and should be done before build.
Boundary example: "Pick the best LLM provider." Response: this is a vendor evaluation, not a product strategy—use evaluating-new-technology. If the broader product decision is unclear, offer to run this strategy workflow first to define what you need from a provider.
Common anti-patterns (avoid these)
- "We use AI" as differentiation. If your only moat is "we added an LLM," anyone can copy you in weeks. Push for data, distribution, or workflow advantages.
- Agent-first without permissions. Defaulting to maximum autonomy before validating with copilot mode. Start with suggest, graduate to act.
- No evals = no strategy. A strategy without measurable quality targets and offline evals is a wish list. Non-deterministic systems require empirical validation.
- Ignoring the cost curve. AI inference costs are real. A strategy that doesn't model cost-per-user or cost-per-task will hit a wall at scale.
- "We'll iterate" without a plan. Iteration requires instrumentation, review cadence, and decision rules—not just good intentions.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: liqiongyu
- Source: liqiongyu/lennyskills_plus
- License: Apache-2.0
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.