AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Ai Product Strategy

skill-liqiongyu-lenny-skills-plus-ai-product-strategy · by liqiongyu

Create an AI Product Strategy Pack (thesis, use cases, system plan, eval plan, roadmap).

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-liqiongyu-lenny-skills-plus-ai-product-strategy

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Ai Product Strategy? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

AI Product Strategy

Scope

Covers

  • Defining an executable product strategy for an AI/LLM/agent product or AI feature portfolio
  • Translating AI uncertainty (non-determinism, emergent risks) into an empirical plan with evals + instrumentation
  • Choosing product form factor (assistant vs copilot vs agent), autonomy boundaries, and a safety/security posture
  • Setting kill criteria so you know when to pivot or stop investing
  • Producing a strategy pack leaders and teams can use to align and execute

When to use

  • "Define our AI product strategy / LLM strategy / agent strategy."
  • "Prioritize AI use cases and turn them into an AI roadmap."
  • "We're adding AI to an existing product—what should we build and how do we measure it?"
  • "We want to ship an agent; define autonomy, security, and rollout."
  • "Should we keep investing in our AI feature, or kill it?"

When NOT to use

  • You need to build/implement an LLM system (RAG pipeline, prompt engineering, tool use) → use building-with-llms.
  • You need to evaluate a specific AI vendor or tool (Claude vs GPT, build vs buy for one tool) → use evaluating-new-technology.
  • You need to design an AI platform for third-party developers (APIs, ecosystem, marketplace) → use platform-strategy.
  • You need to rapidly prototype an AI demo/proof-of-concept → use vibe-coding.
  • You need a long-term product/company vision → use defining-product-vision first.
  • You need deep competitor research, battlecards, or win/loss → use competitive-analysis.
  • You need a feature-level PRD/spec/design doc → use writing-prds / writing-specs-designs after strategy.
  • You don't yet have a clear problem/ICP hypothesis → use problem-definition / conducting-user-interviews.

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product context (what exists today) + target customer/user + their job/pain
  • Strategy horizon (default: 3–12 months) + constraints (budget, latency, policy/legal, data access, platform)
  • Intended AI surface and scope: assistant / copilot / agent; where it lives in the workflow
  • Success metrics (1–3) and guardrails (2–5), including safety/trust, cost, and latency

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md) (3–5 at a time).
  • If details remain missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 options (use-case focus, autonomy level, build/buy).

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce an AI Product Strategy Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested), in this order:

1) Context snapshot (decision, users, constraints, why now) 2) Strategy thesis (value prop, why-now, differentiation, non-goals) 3) Use-case portfolio (prioritized opportunities with feasibility + risk) 4) Autonomy policy (assistant→copilot→agent boundaries + human control points) 5) System plan (build/buy, data plan, eval plan, cost/latency budgets) 6) Empirical learning plan (experiments, instrumentation, iteration cadence) 7) Roadmap (phases, milestones, exit criteria, owners) 8) Kill criteria (when to pivot or stop; sunk-cost guardrails) 9) Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md)

Quick mode: If the user needs a lightweight strategy (single feature, early exploration, or time-boxed to hasn't reached X after Y weeks, we stop/pivot."

  1. Run [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and score with [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md).
  2. Always add Risks / Open questions / Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final AI Product Strategy Pack.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can act on the pack without a meeting; trade-offs and unknowns are explicit; there's a clear "what would make us stop."

Quality gate (required)

  • Use [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md).
  • Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.

Examples

Example 1 (AI-first product): "Use ai-product-strategy to define strategy for an AI coding assistant for mid-market engineering teams. Constraints: ship a beta in 8 weeks; must not leak proprietary code; budget capped at $X/month." Expected: strategy thesis + prioritized use cases + autonomy policy + system/eval plan + roadmap + kill criteria.

Example 2 (AI feature portfolio): "Use ai-product-strategy to prioritize AI opportunities for a customer support platform. Decide copilot vs agent, include safety posture, and propose a 2-quarter roadmap." Expected: use-case portfolio with 1–3 bets, a clear agency-control policy, empirical plan, and phased roadmap with exit criteria.

Example 3 (Quick mode): "I have 30 minutes—give me a lightweight AI strategy for adding summarization to our internal wiki." Expected: context snapshot + 3–5 use cases scored in a table + phased roadmap + risks/next steps. Note that autonomy policy and system plan were skipped and should be done before build.

Boundary example: "Pick the best LLM provider." Response: this is a vendor evaluation, not a product strategy—use evaluating-new-technology. If the broader product decision is unclear, offer to run this strategy workflow first to define what you need from a provider.

Common anti-patterns (avoid these)

  1. "We use AI" as differentiation. If your only moat is "we added an LLM," anyone can copy you in weeks. Push for data, distribution, or workflow advantages.
  2. Agent-first without permissions. Defaulting to maximum autonomy before validating with copilot mode. Start with suggest, graduate to act.
  3. No evals = no strategy. A strategy without measurable quality targets and offline evals is a wish list. Non-deterministic systems require empirical validation.
  4. Ignoring the cost curve. AI inference costs are real. A strategy that doesn't model cost-per-user or cost-per-task will hit a wall at scale.
  5. "We'll iterate" without a plan. Iteration requires instrumentation, review cadence, and decision rules—not just good intentions.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.