AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Academic Paper Reviewer

skill-lord1egypt-awesome-skill-forge-academic-paper-reviewer · by Lord1Egypt

7-agent paper review system on Hermes Agent. 6 modes (full/re-review/quick/methodology-focus/guided/calibration). 5-panel review with editorial decision, revision roadmap, and calibration metrics. Uses delegate_task for each reviewer. Triggers: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, check revisions, calibrate reviewer, 審稿, 同儕審查, 論文審查.

No reviews yet
0 installs
12 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-lord1egypt-awesome-skill-forge-academic-paper-reviewer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Academic Paper Reviewer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Academic Paper Reviewer — 7-Agent Review System (Hermes Edition)

📄 License: CC BY-NC 4.0 · Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu 🔗 Original: Imbad0202/academic-research-skills 🔄 Adaptation: Multi-agent review system implemented via delegate_task instead of Claude Code's internal agent system. All agent definitions, references, and quality standards preserved unchanged from original. This adaptation is distributed under the same CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Quick Start

Review this paper for journal submission

Agent Team

| # | Agent | Role | |---|-------|------| | 1 | intakeagent | Receive paper, determine review type | | 2 | methodologyreviewer | Method rigor assessment | | 3 | evidencereviewer | Evidence sufficiency & citation quality | | 4 | argumentreviewer | Logical coherence & argument structure | | 5 | domainreviewer | Domain expertise & literature positioning | | 6 | editorinchief | Aggregate reviews → editorial decision | | 7 | revisioncoach | Convert reviews → actionable roadmap |

Hermes Execution

Full Mode: 5-Panel Parallel Review

delegate_task(tasks=[
    {"goal": "Review manuscript methodology: design appropriateness, validity threats, replicability. Score 1-5.", "context": "Use agents/methodology_reviewer.md", "toolsets": ["file"]},
    {"goal": "Review evidence: citation quality, source credibility, evidence hierarchy alignment. Score 1-5.", "context": "Use agents/evidence_reviewer.md", "toolsets": ["file"]},
    {"goal": "Review argument: logical flow, claim-evidence alignment, counter-argument handling. Score 1-5.", "context": "Use agents/argument_reviewer.md", "toolsets": ["file"]},
    {"goal": "Review domain positioning: literature coverage, theoretical grounding, contribution significance. Score 1-5.", "context": "Use agents/domain_reviewer.md", "toolsets": ["file"]}
])

Editorial Decision

delegate_task(goal="Aggregate all 4 reviewer reports. Apply weighted scoring (Method 30%, Evidence 25%, Argument 25%, Domain 20%). Issue editorial decision: Accept/Minor Revision/Major Revision/Reject with justification.", context="Use agents/editor_in_chief.md", toolsets=["file"])

Revision Roadmap

delegate_task(goal="Convert editorial decision + reviewer reports into structured Revision Roadmap: prioritized action items, estimated effort, dependency mapping.", context="Use agents/revision_coach.md", toolsets=["file"])

6 Modes

| Mode | Trigger | Agents | |------|---------|--------| | full | "Review paper" | All 7 | | re-review | "Check revisions" | 2→3→4→6 | | quick | "Quick review" | 6 only (EIC assessment) | | methodology-focus | "Check methodology" | 2 only | | guided | "Guide me to improve" | Socratic: 6 with user interaction | | calibration | "Calibrate reviewer" | All + calibration metrics output |

Calibration Mode

Measures reviewer accuracy: FNR (False Negative Rate), FPR (False Positive Rate), AUC. Requires ground-truth labels on prior reviewed papers.

Critical Rules

  1. ⚠️ Reviewers are paper-blind (don't see author info)
  2. ⚠️ Every criticism must include specific actionable suggestion
  3. ⚠️ Calibration mode requires 5+ ground-truth papers

Security & Privacy

Multi-agent design disclosure: This skill delegates review tasks across multiple subagents via delegate_task. Manuscript content and intermediate review outputs are processed by these agents. Use only with manuscripts you are comfortable having processed through the AI provider's delegated-agent workflow. Remove confidential material not needed for review.

Tool access: Subagents are granted only file tools for reading/writing review outputs. No terminal, web, or system tools are exposed.

Agent files: The agents/ directory contains academic peer-review prompt templates (role definitions, scoring rubrics, methodology guidelines). These are task instructions loaded as context in delegate_task calls — NOT system prompt overrides.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.