Install
$ agentstack add skill-lucianghinda-agentic-skills-pr-description ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
PR Description Writer
Generate structured PR descriptions from branch commits.
Workflow
- Get commits:
git log --oneline origin/main..HEAD(fallback toHEAD~10..HEAD) - Get each commit's details:
git show --stat --format="%H%n%s%n%b" - Get each commit's diff:
git diff ^.. - Write PR description following the output format below
Output Format
1. Title
Single line. Use most meaningful commit subject or synthesize one. Keep short and technical.
2. Summary (2-5 bullets)
High-level changes. Each bullet concrete and verifiable.
3. Why (1-4 bullets)
Motivation, problem, or user impact. Tie to reliability, security, performance, DX, or product needs.
4. Commit-by-commit details
For EACH commit, add subsection with exact subject as heading:
What: 1-3 bullets describing concrete changes
Why: 1-2 bullets explaining motivation/tradeoffs
Notes: (optional) only for risk, migration, follow-up, or nuance
Rules:
- Preserve commit subject exactly as written
- If commit has a meaningful description use that
- If commit is noisy (formatting, rename), say so briefly
- Related commits: document each, keep later ones shorter ("follow-up", "fixup")
5. Testing
Checklist of what was done. If none provided, infer likely checks and label "Suggested".
6. Risk and rollout (2-6 bullets)
- What could break
- Where to watch
- Rollback plan (1 line)
- If breaking change, include BREAKING CHANGE callout
7. Screenshots/logs (optional)
Only if UI, behavior, or observability changed.
Style
- Direct and technical. No marketing tone.
- No fluff or jokes.
- Short sentences. Prefer bullets over paragraphs.
- Do not invent facts. Say "Likely" or "Inferred" if uncertain.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: lucianghinda
- Source: lucianghinda/agentic-skills
- License: Apache-2.0
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.