Install
$ agentstack add skill-rtbenfield-agent-experience-pr-description ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
PR Description
Generate a PR description from the git diff between the current branch and the default branch. Produces a concise, review-oriented summary — context and reasoning, not a verbatim change list.
Pre-conditions — halt if unmet
- No git repository. Requires a git repo with a default branch to diff against. Halt if not in a repo.
Workflow
- Identify the target branch. Assume
mainunless the operator specifies otherwise. Ifmaindoesn't exist, checkgit remote show originorgit branch -rfor the default. - Get the diff:
git diff ...HEAD - Analyze changes. Determine intent, scope, and key technical decisions. Ignore tangential changes (import reorganization, minor refactors) unless they're the focus of the PR.
- Generate description following the structure below.
- Present the title and body as separate outputs (see Output format). See Examples for sample outputs.
Structure
Title
- One-line summary of what was added/changed/fixed — the "what", not the "why"
- Omit branch name (redundant in a PR context)
- Examples: "Add theme persistence hook and dark token overrides", "Implement dark mode with persistence and OS sync"
Overview
1-2 sentences: purpose and motivation. Sets context for why this change exists. Do not repeat the title.
Changes
Big-picture changes organized by component, service, or area. Each item:
- States why and how — not a verbatim change list
- Cites key files, functions, or modules when it aids understanding (repo-relative paths only)
- Includes concrete technical details when they matter (timeouts, limits, formats, protocols)
Why
Key technical decisions and their reasoning:
- Why this approach over alternatives
- Security, performance, or reliability implications when relevant
- Constraints or requirements that drove decisions
Output format
Provide two separate outputs:
- Title — plain text wrapped in a markdown block
- Body — GitHub-flavored Markdown in a single markdown code block
[One-line summary]
[Overview paragraph]
## Changes
- **Component/Area**: Big-picture change with why/how context
## Why
[Key technical decisions and reasoning]
Critical: Do NOT nest markdown blocks. Provide title and body as two distinct outputs. Always use repo-relative paths.
Examples
- Example 1 (
assets/example-1.md): Single-component change — theme hook and token overrides. Demonstrates concise changes and decision reasoning. - Example 2 (
assets/example-2.md): Multi-component change — full dark mode implementation. Demonstrates organizing changes by area and explaining cross-cutting decisions.
Rules
- Context, not repetition. Aid review — don't restate what's visible in the diff.
- Big picture focus. Explain why and how, not every individual change.
- Repo-relative paths only.
src/lib.rs, never/home/user/project/src/lib.rs - No branch names in the body. Redundant in PR context.
- No duplicated title in the body. Title is a separate output.
- No incidental improvements. Omit added logging, import cleanup, minor refactors, and similar housekeeping unless they're the PR's focus.
- Concise. Optimize for quick reading by reviewers.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rtbenfield
- Source: rtbenfield/agent-experience
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.