AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Wf Shape

skill-marchatton-agent-skills-wf-shape · by marchatton

This skill should only be used when the user uses the word workflow and asks to shape a project from messy inputs into a de-risked, de-scoped shaped packet (brief, breadboard, risks, spikes) ready for wf-plan, with handoff/pickup boundaries to avoid context rot.

No reviews yet
0 installs
35 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-marchatton-agent-skills-wf-shape

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-marchatton-agent-skills-wf-shape)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
6mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Wf Shape? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

wf-shape

Purpose

Turn messy inputs into a shaped packet that is ready for commit-ready planning (wf-plan) or, for small/low-risk work, ready to go straight into wf-develop driven by prd.json.

Optimise for:

  • picking the problems/opportunities that create high user and/or business value
  • de-scope (draw the perimeter)
  • risks understood (rabbit holes surfaced + treated)
  • concrete artefacts (brief + breadboard + spikes)
  • PRD spine that agents can actually execute against

Inputs

  • Raw notes, feature idea, bug report, links
  • Constraints + appetite/timebox
  • Any existing artefacts (designs, metrics, incidents)

Outputs (dossier)

Create/update a dossier folder:

  • docs/04-projects//_/

Files:

  • brief.md (1–2 pager)
  • breadboard-pack.md
  • risk-register.md
  • spike-investigation.md (optional; single file)
  • prd.md (can be one or many)
  • prd.json (recommended; created via create-json-prd) (can be one or many)

Steps

0) Pickup (recommended if resuming / new thread)

  • Understand where we are in the process.
  • If new, start at step 1.
  • Otherwise start at the relevant step (usually step 8), but first ensure previous steps have been completed.

1) Start a dossier (if not created already)

  • Choose id_ (prefer 0001_).
  • Choose a lane under docs/04-projects/.
  • Create dossier + stub files.

2) Write the 1–2 pager brief

  • Inputs should come from the user by invoking ask-questions-if-underspecified and/or using relevant context.
  • Write brief.md.
  • Hard requirements:
  • goals + non-goals
  • in-scope/out-of-scope perimeter
  • top risks + unknowns
  • open questions
  • GO/NO-GO placeholder

3) Breadboard

  • Invoke breadboarding skill.
  • Save as breadboard-pack.md (places/affordances/connections + parts list + rabbit holes + fit check).

4) Risk register

  • Write risk-register.md.
  • For every top risk choose: Cut / Patch / Spike / Out-of-bounds.

5) Spike investigation (only for Spike items)

  • Invoke spike-investigation skill for each Spike.
  • Record results in spike-investigation.md.

6) Oracle bundle (mandatory)

  • Invoke oracle once to create an oracle bundle for the dossier so later oracle passes have clean, repeatable context.
  • Bundle inputs should include (at minimum):
  • dossier brief.md
  • dossier breadboard-pack.md
  • dossier spike-investigation.md
  • dossier risk-register.md
  • any raw notes/links that materially affect scope
  • any existing artefacts (designs, metrics, incidents) that materially affect decisions

7) Midpoint handoff (mandatory, before PRD creation)

  • Invoke handoff skill as a context checkpoint (this is separate from the final handoff).
  • Include:
  • dossier path
  • current brief status + perimeter draft (in/out)
  • all context from dossier files
  • oracle bundle created: y/n + what was included
  • next step: PRD creation

8) Pickup on context

  • User manually links to the midpoint handoff file and oracle findings and invokes the pickup skill.

9) Review oracle pass and make updates to:

  • brief.md
  • breadboard-pack.md
  • spike-investigation.md (when present)
  • risk-register.md

Also consider making updates to relevant docs/03-architecture documents where required.

10) PRD (source of truth for “done”)

  • Use the create-prd skill to create one or many prd.md in the dossier.
  • If acceptance criteria are missing, write explicit TODOs rather than vibes.

11) JSON PRD (recommended)

  • Run create-json-prd skill so agents/tools can execute acceptance criteria.
  • Each prd.md should have a corresponding prd.json.
  • Ensure it validates against the repo schema (NO-GO if invalid).

12) Synthesis + perimeter lock

  • Update brief.md, prd.mds and prd.jsons to reflect the final perimeter, cuts, and risk treatments.
  • Ensure breadboard is buildable as parts.

13) Shaping decision

  • GO only if biggest risks are proved, cut, or out-of-bounds.

14) Handoff (pick wf-plan vs wf-develop explicitly)

  • Invoke handoff and include:
  • dossier path
  • perimeter (in/out)
  • biggest risks + spike outcomes
  • PRD status (prd.json validated? y/n)
  • Plan needed: yes/no + why
  • Recommended paths:
  • If Plan needed = yes → wf-plan
  • If Plan needed = no → wf-develop using prd.json
  • Recommend starting the next step in a fresh thread:
  • /new then pickup then run wf-plan or wf-develop with the dossier path

Verification

  • brief has perimeter + testable outcomes
  • risk register has a mitigation for each top risk
  • PRD exists with acceptance criteria
  • prd.json validates (when created)

Go/No-Go

  • GO if a stranger can explain what will be built and what won’t from brief + PRD + breadboard.
  • NO-GO if core mechanics are still foggy.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.