Install
$ agentstack add skill-martinolivero-saas-builder-pre-ship-security ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ● Environment & secrets Used
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Pre-Ship Security
This is the last security gate before production: a quick, repeatable review of the finished code. It verifies that nothing slipped through what secure-coding prevented during the build.
Analogy: secure-coding is the seatbelt you wear while driving. A deep audit (Trail of Bits, fuzzing) is the garage that x-rays every part. This skill is the walk-around inspection before a road trip — lights, tire pressure, fuel. Quick, done every time, catches the obvious before you pull out of the driveway.
It does not replace a professional audit for high-risk apps — its job is to tell you when you need one. Security is never 100%; this skill is honest about that.
Trigger
Run when the user is about to deploy, merge to main, launch, or asks "is this safe to ship?". It pairs with secure-coding (which ran during the build) and deployment (which ships it).
Discovery (max 3 questions, only if unknown)
- What does the app handle — payments, personal data (PII), health, or crypto/keys?
- Is this the first production launch, or an incremental deploy?
- Public-facing or internal-only?
Step 1 — Automated quick scans
npm audit --omit=dev(orpnpm audit) → fix high/critical advisories; don't ship known-vulnerable dependencies.- Secret scan:
npx gitleaks detect(and check git history) → no API keys, tokens, or.envcommitted. If something is found, rotate the secret — deleting the commit is not enough, it's in the history. - Confirm
.env,.env*.local,*.pem,*.keyare git-ignored. - Client-bundle leak check: grep the built JS for known key prefixes; on Vite, anything that isn't
VITE_-prefixed must be absent from the bundle.
Step 2 — Review the diff against the prevention checklist
Re-check the finished code — the secure-coding rules, now verified instead of assumed:
- Authz on every endpoint? Each route checks the user and resource ownership (no IDOR). A route with no explicit check is the bug.
- Input validated? Every handler parses input with a
zod.strict()schema; noreq.bodyspread into a DB write (mass assignment). - No raw SQL concatenation — parameterized queries / ORM only.
- CORS is an explicit allowlist, not
*with credentials. - Security headers present (Helmet or platform headers): CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options.
- Webhooks verify signatures (Stripe, etc.) and read the raw body correctly.
- Errors don't leak stack traces in prod; logs contain no PII, tokens, or passwords.
- Auth routes rate-limited; passwords hashed with bcrypt/argon2.
Step 3 — Risk gate (escalate when needed)
Based on Discovery answer 1, decide whether a deeper review is required — and be explicit that deep auditing is out of this plugin's scope on purpose:
- Handles money, PII at scale, health data, or crypto/keys → recommend a deep audit before or shortly after launch, and point to specialized tooling:
- Static analysis: Semgrep / CodeQL (e.g. the
static-analysisor Trail of Bits skills). - Dependency / supply-chain: Dependabot, Snyk, supply-chain auditors.
- Fuzzing: only if there's parsing, crypto, or native code — AFL++, libFuzzer (the testing-handbook skills). Not relevant to a typical CRUD SaaS.
- Standard low-risk CRUD SaaS → the checks above are a reasonable bar for launch. Say so honestly: this is a review, not a guarantee.
Output
Deliver: the scan results (audit + secrets), a pass/fail list against the checklist with the exact file:line of anything to fix, and a clear verdict — "safe to ship at this risk level", "fix these N items first", or "high-risk: get a deep audit". Never claim the app is fully secure.
Reference
OWASP Cheat Sheet Series (~29k⭐), npm audit, gitleaks (~18k⭐), Helmet. Escalation targets: Semgrep/CodeQL, Trail of Bits skills, testing-handbook (fuzzing), Snyk/Dependabot.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: MartinOlivero
- Source: MartinOlivero/saas-builder
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://iamautom.com
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.