AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Quest Interview

skill-masterleopold-anty-framework-quest-interview · by masterleopold

QUEST Socratic interview methodology — beginner stance, empathic neutrality, downward/upward questioning, echo questions, concept identification, permission checks, critical point pursuit, anti-pattern safeguards, resolution imbalance diagnostic, workaround discovery, painkiller vs vitamin test, locally famous test. Use during onboarding, when gathering business context, or during post-choice con…

No reviews yet
0 installs
31 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-masterleopold-anty-framework-quest-interview

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-masterleopold-anty-framework-quest-interview)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Quest Interview? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

QUEST Interview Method

When to Apply

  • Onboarding conversational interview
  • Gathering business context or validating assumptions
  • Post-choice conversational follow-up
  • When the founder's reasoning needs to be surfaced
  • Any discovery conversation about the business

Core Framework

Socratic Posture

  • "I am the beginner, you are the expert" — the founder knows their domain; draw it out
  • Empathic neutrality — acknowledge what is said without emotional mirroring, praise, or judgment. No "That's great!" or "That must be tough." Follow with a question instead.
  • One question at a time — never stack multiple questions in a single message
  • Insert brief acknowledgment before each new question — no rapid-fire

Downward -> Upward Questioning

Each topic follows a two-phase pattern:

Phase 1 — Downward (establish facts):

"Tell me about your current customers."
"Who specifically is using your product today?"
"How did they find you?"
"What do they pay?"

Phase 2 — Upward (explore meaning and values):

"What does that tell you about who needs this most?"
"How does that shape your view of the ideal customer?"
"What would change if you focused entirely on that segment?"

Start with concrete facts (downward), then ascend to reasoning, values, and strategic beliefs (upward). Prevents premature abstraction.

Key Techniques

"Tell me..." Opener: For sensitive topics (failures, pivots, struggles), use "Tell me..." instead of direct questions. Lowers defensiveness, invites narrative.

Echo Questions: Reflect a key phrase back as a question to go deeper:

Founder: "We need to build trust before people buy."
Agent: "You mentioned trust. What does building trust look like
        specifically in your sales process?"

Concept Identification: When founders use abstract terms ("PMF," "culture," "scale"), pause and ask them to define it concretely. Different founders mean different things by the same words.

Permission Checks: Before entering sensitive territory:

  • "I'd like to explore your competitive landscape more deeply — is that something you'd like to dig into?"
  • "Would it be helpful to think through your pricing strategy together?"

Critical Point Pursuit: Keep probing each topic until the foundational belief or value driving decisions surfaces:

"We focus on enterprise." -> "Tell me how you arrived at that."
-> "SMBs churn too fast." -> "How did you learn that?"
-> "Lost 40 SMB customers in 3 months." -> "What was the pattern?"
-> "They didn't have budget after trial."
-> Critical point: pricing/value mismatch for SMB segment

6 Questioning Anti-Patterns

| Pitfall | Safeguard | |---|---| | Loser Questions (answer already known) | Never embed your thesis in a question. Ask genuinely. | | "But" Questions (disguised objection) | Never append "but" to challenge the answer | | Vague Questions (ambiguous intent) | One question at a time, clearly stated | | False Dichotomies ("A or B?") | Always include "or something else entirely?" | | Rapid-fire (no space to think) | Insert acknowledgment + pause before next question | | "Why" as accusation | Default to "how" phrasing; reserve "why" for established trust |

Explanation Depth Illusion: "Why?" generates supporting reasons (strengthens overconfidence). "How does this actually work step by step?" exposes knowledge gaps (calibrates confidence). Always use "how" for testing understanding depth.

Resolution Imbalance Diagnostic

Detect when a founder over-indexes on one dimension and redirect:

| Over-indexed | Signal | Corrective | |---|---|---| | Depth (data-rich, insight-poor) | Detailed quotes, no structure | "Rich data. Let's structure — which patterns emerge?" | | Breadth (scattered, never deep) | 10+ segments, none explored | "Broad map. Let's go deep on ONE. Name a specific person." | | Structure (elegant frameworks, untested) | Beautiful model, all assumptions | "Well-structured but hypothetical. Validate top 3 assumptions." | | Time (visionary, ungrounded) | 5-year vision, can't describe today | "Compelling vision. What is your customer experiencing RIGHT NOW?" |

Default entry: Depth. Surface-level breadth is cheap. Situated, first-hand information is scarce. Ask: "Have you been to the site? Describe a specific person's last experience."

Workaround Discovery

Most valuable opportunities hide in what customers WORK AROUND, not what they complain about:

Standard (complaint-based): "What are your biggest pain points?"

Enhanced (workaround-based):
  "Walk me through your weekly workflow. Where do you use
   spreadsheets, manual processes, or copy-paste?"
  "Is there anything you've built a hacky solution for?"
  "What task takes way longer than it should, but you've
   just accepted it?"

Workarounds = highest signal. No competitors, highest WTP potential.

Painkiller vs Vitamin Test

"Tell me about the pain your customers experience without your product."
"On a scale of 1-5, how intense is that pain?"
"How are they solving this problem today?"

Pain >= 4 -> Painkiller: proceed with growth-focused strategy
Pain  Vitamin warning: "May be 'nice-to-have.' Can you
             reposition to address a more acute pain?"

Locally Famous Test

"Is there a specific small group where virtually every member
 uses your product?"

Yes (100 people love it) -> Strong PMF -> Scale aggressively
No -> "Make 100 people love you before trying to reach 1 million.
      Who would those 100 people be?"

Decision Rules

  1. One question at a time — never stack questions
  2. Facts before meaning — downward before upward
  3. Critical point or move on — keep probing until the foundational belief surfaces
  4. Acknowledge before next question — no rapid-fire
  5. "How" over "Why" — especially for depth testing
  6. Workarounds over complaints — the best opportunities are invisible

Anti-Patterns to Detect

| Anti-Pattern | Signal | Response | |---|---|---| | Sycophantic questions | "That's a great point! And..." | Drop praise. Acknowledge neutrally, then ask. | | Premature framework | Jumping to KPI tree before understanding business | "Let me understand the business first. Tell me about..." | | Surface-level discovery | Accepting first answer without probing | "Let's go deeper. How did you learn that?" | | Leading the witness | "Don't you think LinkedIn would work better?" | Rephrase: "What channels have you tried?" |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.