AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Building A Sample Management Workflow

skill-meltedinhex-analyst-ai-pack-building-a-sample-management-workflow · by meltedinhex

Establishes a disciplined malware sample repository: content-addressed storage by

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-meltedinhex-analyst-ai-pack-building-a-sample-management-workflow

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Building A Sample Management Workflow? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Building a Sample Management Workflow

When to Use

  • You are accumulating malware samples and need a repeatable, safe way to store and find them.
  • You need metadata and provenance (source, date, case) attached to every sample.
  • You want content-addressed storage so the same sample is never duplicated or misnamed.

Do not use original filenames or loose folders as the organizing principle — names are attacker-controlled and collide; address samples by hash.

Prerequisites

  • The hashing skill for content addressing; encrypted/password-protected archive tooling.
  • A defined storage location inside the isolated lab.

Safety & Handling

  • Store every sample inside a password-protected archive (commonly infected) so it cannot

auto-execute or be scanned/quarantined by host AV.

  • Strip the executable bit / neutralize the extension at rest; restore only inside the lab.

Workflow

Step 1: Content-address on intake

On receipt, compute SHA-256 and store the sample under a path derived from its hash (e.g., samples/ab/cd/), preventing duplicates and name collisions.

python scripts/analyst.py intake sample.bin --source "phishing-case-42" --store ./samples

Step 2: Record metadata

Write a metadata record per sample: hashes, original name, source, intake date, case ID, file type, and analyst — kept next to the sample or in an index.

Step 3: Archive safely

Wrap the sample in a password-protected archive; keep the inert copy out of host AV's reach and the metadata in plaintext for searchability.

Step 4: Maintain chain of custody

Append-only log each access/action (who, when, what) so the sample's handling is auditable.

Step 5: Index and search

Build a searchable index over metadata so samples can be found by hash, family, source, or case without touching the raw bytes.

Validation

  • The same sample always lands at the same hash-derived path (idempotent intake).
  • Every sample has a complete metadata record and an access log entry.
  • Samples are stored password-protected; metadata is searchable in plaintext.

Pitfalls

  • Organizing by attacker-supplied filename, causing collisions and confusion.
  • Storing live samples unarchived where host AV deletes them mid-analysis.
  • Losing provenance, so an indicator cannot be traced back to its case.

References

  • See [references/api-reference.md](references/api-reference.md) for the intake/indexer.
  • NIST SP 800-86 and MalwareBazaar conventions (linked in frontmatter).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.