Gsp Build Review
Use when reviewing a built or in-progress game against the locked brief before claiming completion.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-mike007jd-game-superpowers-gsp-build-review ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mike007jd-game-superpowers-gsp-build-review) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Game Build Review
Goal
Default review stage between implementation and runtime verification. Catch shape drift, weak scope decisions, and fake-complete output before verifier time is spent.
Outputs
Follow the gsp-orchestrator output strategy:
- inline (default): present review findings in conversation.
- minimal or full: write
docs/game-studio/build-review.md.
Review focus
- does the current build still match the locked game form
- does the implementation match the approved brief and current task plan
- are the requested core verbs and loops actually present
- is the result fake-complete, placeholder-heavy, or missing obvious quality-critical work
- did the builder introduce unnecessary complexity or unrelated scope
- are the next fixes better handled before runtime verification
Reporting rules
For each issue, report:
- severity: critical / important / minor
- evidence source
- short repair direction
Important
This is not the runtime verifier. Review the implementation against the concept, brief, and plan so the verifier receives a build worth testing.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mike007jd
- Source: mike007jd/game-superpowers
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.