AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Grammar Style Checker

skill-muhammad1438-academic-writer-skills-grammar-style-checker · by muhammad1438

Review, correct, and improve the grammar, mechanics, style, and tone of academic writing. Use this skill whenever the user wants proofreading, grammar correction, style improvement, or feedback on language quality in an academic context. Trigger for: "proofread this," "fix the grammar," "check my writing," "is this grammatically correct?", "improve the style," "is this too informal?", "fix my ten…

No reviews yet
0 installs
29 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-muhammad1438-academic-writer-skills-grammar-style-checker

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-muhammad1438-academic-writer-skills-grammar-style-checker)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
6mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Grammar Style Checker? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Grammar & Style Checker

Academic grammar transcends basic syntactic correctness — it encompasses tone, voice, precision, and the deployment of inclusive, unambiguous language. Careless sentence construction introduces ambiguity, distracts readers, and fatally impedes scholarly communication.


1. Voice — Active vs. Passive

When to Use Active Voice

  • APA 7th explicitly recommends active voice for clarity
  • Best for: describing what researchers did, making your argument clear
  • "We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 participants."

When to Use Passive Voice

  • Appropriate in STEM when the focus should be on the procedure/phenomenon, not the researcher
  • "Samples were collected and stored at −20°C."
  • Appropriate when the agent is unknown or irrelevant
  • Appropriate for impersonal academic constructions

The Test

Ask: Who is doing the action? If the actor matters, use active. If the phenomenon or action matters more, use passive.


2. Tense Conventions by Section

| Section | Tense | Example | |---|---|---| | Introduction — general facts | Present | "Anxiety affects approximately 18% of the adult population." | | Introduction — specific past studies | Past | "Smith (2019) found that..." | | Methods | Past | "Data were collected using..." | | Results | Past | "Results indicated that..." | | Discussion — interpreting your findings | Present for interpretation | "These findings suggest that..." | | Discussion — your specific results | Past | "The present study found that..." | | Conclusion — implications | Present | "These results have significant implications for..." | | Literature review — established findings | Present | "Research consistently demonstrates..." | | Literature review — specific study | Past | "Jones (2020) reported..." |

Key rule: Never mix tenses randomly within a section. Choose appropriately and be consistent.


3. Parallel Structure

All items in a series, list, or comparison must share the same grammatical form.

Broken parallel: > "The study aimed to identify the risk factors, the development of a screening tool, and how to train healthcare workers." ✗

Corrected: > "The study aimed to identify the risk factors, develop a screening tool, and train healthcare workers." ✓

Applies to:

  • Bulleted and numbered lists (all items same part of speech)
  • Headings within the same level (all noun phrases, or all gerunds, or all sentences)
  • Coordinated elements with "and," "or," "but"
  • Comparative constructions ("more X than Y" — X and Y must be same type)

4. Pronoun Reference — Eliminating Vague Pronouns

"This," "it," "they," "which," and "these" must have clear, unambiguous antecedents.

Vague: > "The study showed that the intervention reduced anxiety. This is significant." ✗ (What is significant? The reduction? The study? The intervention?)

Clear: > "The study showed that the intervention reduced anxiety. This reduction is significant." ✓

Rule: Add a noun after "this," "that," "these," and "those" whenever the referent could be ambiguous. Never let "this" stand alone as a subject.


5. Avoiding Anthropomorphism

Do not attribute human mental processes to inanimate objects, concepts, or texts.

| Anthropomorphic (Wrong) | Corrected | |---|---| | "The theory argues that..." | "This theory holds that..." / "According to this theory..." | | "The study believes..." | "The study suggests..." / "The authors argue..." | | "The data feel..." | "The data indicate..." | | "The results want to show..." | "The results demonstrate..." | | "The paper thinks..." | "The author contends..." |

Rule: Theories, studies, papers, and data do not argue, believe, or feel. Only humans do. Use: indicate, suggest, demonstrate, show, reveal, find.


6. Bias-Free and Inclusive Language (APA 7th Standard)

  • Use the singular "they" as a generic third-person pronoun (not "he/she" or "he or she")
  • Respect self-identification: use the terms people use for themselves
  • Avoid reductive labels: describe the condition, not the person ("a person with diabetes," not "a diabetic")
  • Acknowledge intersectionality where relevant
  • Avoid loaded or stigmatising terms (check APA Bias-Free Language Guidelines, Chapter 5)
  • Do not use "normal" as a comparison group label (implies others are "abnormal")

7. Nominalization — Use Judiciously

Nominalization increases information density and objectivity. But overuse creates impenetrable prose.

Over-nominalized: > "An investigation into the determination of the significance of the relationship between variables was conducted." ✗

Improved: > "The study investigated whether the two variables were significantly related." ✓

Principle: Nominalise to foreground a concept. De-nominalise when the action or agent matters and clarity is at stake.


8. Sentence Variety

Repeating the same sentence structure creates monotony and reduces readability.

Sentence Types to Mix

  • Simple: One main clause. "The results were significant."
  • Compound: Two main clauses joined by a coordinator. "The results were significant, and they replicated across all subgroups."
  • Complex: One main clause + one subordinate clause. "Although the sample was small, the results were statistically significant."
  • Compound-complex: Two main clauses + at least one subordinate clause.

Vary Sentence Openers

Avoid starting every sentence with the subject. Alternatives:

  • Adverbial opener: "Notably, the intervention..." / "Consequently, participants..."
  • Participial phrase: "Building on prior work, this study..."
  • Prepositional phrase: "In the context of globalisation, X..."
  • Subordinate clause: "Although previous studies have..., the current study..."

9. Punctuation Rules for Academic Writing

Semicolons (;)

  • Join two independent clauses that are closely related (no conjunction needed)
  • "The sample size was adequate; however, the attrition rate was high."
  • Separate items in a list when items themselves contain commas

Colons (:)

  • Introduce a list, explanation, or elaboration that follows directly
  • "Three factors were identified: motivation, access, and support."
  • What precedes the colon must be a complete sentence

Em Dash (—)

  • Emphasise parenthetical information: "The intervention—despite its limited scope—produced significant results."
  • Avoid overuse; each use should be intentional

Commas in Complex Sentences

  • Always after an introductory clause: "Although the data were limited, the findings were consistent."
  • Around non-restrictive clauses: "The study, which was conducted in 2021, found..."
  • Before coordinating conjunctions in compound sentences: "The sample was large, but the response rate was low."

10. Article Usage (a, an, the) — For Academic Precision

The (definite article)

Use when the noun is specific and known to both writer and reader:

  • Previously mentioned: "A study was conducted. The study found..."
  • Unique referent: "The results of this experiment"
  • Superlative: "The most significant finding"

A / An (indefinite article)

Use when introducing something for the first time or when the noun is non-specific:

  • "A literature review was conducted." (first mention)
  • "An interesting finding emerged..."

No Article

  • Uncountable nouns used generally: "Research suggests..." (not "The research suggests" unless specific)
  • Plural nouns used generally: "Studies have shown..." (not "The studies")
  • Proper nouns: "APA style requires..." not "The APA style"

11. Common Style Errors — Academic Replacements

| Avoid | Use Instead | |---|---| | very significant | highly significant / remarkably significant | | really important | critically important / of particular importance | | a lot of studies | numerous studies / a substantial body of research | | etc. | and similar factors / and related phenomena (or list exhaustively) | | thing | factor, element, dimension, construct, phenomenon | | get | obtain, acquire, achieve, yield, receive | | show | demonstrate, reveal, indicate, illustrate | | big difference | substantial difference / marked difference | | use | utilise, employ, apply, implement | | find out | determine, establish, ascertain, identify | | look at | examine, investigate, analyse, explore |


12. Wordiness Reduction — Cut 20% Without Losing Meaning

Common Redundancies to Cut

| Wordy | Concise | |---|---| | "the fact that" | "that" or delete entirely | | "it is important to note that" | delete (just say the thing) | | "in order to" | "to" | | "due to the fact that" | "because" | | "at this point in time" | "now" / "currently" | | "in the event that" | "if" | | "with regard to" | "regarding" / "concerning" | | "a significant number of" | "many" | | "despite the fact that" | "although" | | "on the basis of" | "based on" |

Throat-Clearing Phrases to Delete

  • "It is worth noting that..."
  • "It goes without saying that..."
  • "Needless to say..."
  • "As has been previously mentioned..."
  • "In terms of [X], [X] is..."

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.