AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Pkulaw Mcp Regulatory Reply Check

skill-neu-zha-legal-ai-skills-pkulaw-mcp-regulatory-reply-check · by NEU-ZHA

>

↗ Repository
— No reviews yet
0 installs
38 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-neu-zha-legal-ai-skills-pkulaw-mcp-regulatory-reply-check

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-neu-zha-legal-ai-skills-pkulaw-mcp-regulatory-reply-check)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Pkulaw Mcp Regulatory Reply Check? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

北大法宝 MCP：Regulatory Reply Check（监管/回复函依据核查）

这个 Skill 是交付前引用把关层。 它不负责重新研究整个法律问题，而是专门检查回复函、说明材料、问询答复里的法规引用是否足够稳、足够可追溯。

这个 Skill 真正要完成的动作

把回复材料中的引用整理成：

  • 哪些引用与当次返回一致
  • 哪些引用仍需复核
  • 哪些表述需要修正
  • 哪些关键条文已完成回源

主对象与辅助对象

主对象

  • 回复函、说明材料、问询答复中的引用段落
  • 影响核心结论的法规、规范性文件、监管规则

辅助对象

  • 内部沟通纪要
  • 历史版本草稿
  • 业务部门提供的说明文字

内部口径和草稿只能帮助理解背景，不能替代当次核验依据。

缺信息先追问

以下信息缺失时，先补充：

  • 文档类型：监管回复函、客户回复函、说明材料、审批说明
  • 核查范围：全文、重点段落、脚注、引用清单
  • 哪些结论或段落属于高风险重点核查部分
  • 是否存在明确法域、行业或监管口径限制

若拿不到全文，至少要求提供重点结论段落或引用清单。

推荐工作流

  1. 锁定范围：先确认只核哪些段落、哪些结论。
  2. 识别引用：用 law-recognition 找出文中法规名、条号与潜在线索。
  3. 关键条文回源：对影响核心结论的条文，用 fatiao 回源原文。
  4. 一致性核验：用 citation-validator 检查引用表述与当次返回是否一致。
  5. 形成底稿：按“与当次返回一致 / 待复核 / 需修正”整理核查表。
  6. 链接增强：需要流转审核或沉淀时，用 doc-link 生成可追溯版本。

输出纪律

  • 重点不是证明草稿正确，而是暴露风险引用。
  • “与当次返回一致”不等于已完成实体法律审查。
  • 简称不清、条号不稳、新旧法衔接不明时，优先标“待复核”。
  • 对影响核心结论的条文，尽量至少完成一次回源。

质量门槛

  • 每条“与当次返回一致”都必须有当次依据。
  • 关键条文至少完成一次 fatiao 回源。
  • 未命中或歧义项必须标“待复核”。
  • 需要流转时，优先提供 doc-link 增强版本。

失败与降级

  • law-recognition 命中不足：先按已有明确引用逐条核，不扩写成全面法规研究。
  • fatiao 命中失败：保留法规名和条号线索，标记“待回源”。
  • citation-validator 不可用：只能写“引用待核验”，不能写“引用准确”。

配套文件

  • 核查底稿模板：[template.md](./template.md)
  • 真实业务示例：[examples.md](./examples.md)

关联 Skill

  • 法条识别：[pkulaw-mcp-law-recognition](../pkulaw-mcp-law-recognition/SKILL.md)
  • 精准法条：[pkulaw-mcp-fatiao-precise](../pkulaw-mcp-fatiao-precise/SKILL.md)
  • 引用核验：[pkulaw-mcp-citation-validator](../pkulaw-mcp-citation-validator/SKILL.md)
  • 法宝超链：[pkulaw-mcp-doc-link](../pkulaw-mcp-doc-link/SKILL.md)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Write a review

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.

More in Agent Skills