Install
$ agentstack add skill-owl-listener-ai-design-skills-transparency-patterns ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Transparency Patterns
Transparency in AI products means making the system's knowledge, limitations, and confidence visible to users. It's how you build warranted trust — trust based on understanding, not blind faith.
What to Make Transparent
- Source: Where did the AI get this information? Training data, retrieved documents, user input, inference?
- Confidence: How certain is the AI? Is this a well-supported answer or a best guess?
- Limitations: What doesn't the AI know? What can't it do? Where does its knowledge end?
- Process: How did the AI arrive at this output? What steps did it take?
- Identity: This is an AI, not a human. Never obscure this.
Transparency Patterns
- Confidence indicators: Visual or textual signals of certainty ("I'm fairly confident" vs. "I'm not sure about this")
- Source attribution: Citing where information came from
- Reasoning traces: Showing the AI's step-by-step thinking
- Limitation disclosure: Proactively stating what the AI can't do or doesn't know
- Model cards: High-level descriptions of what the AI is, how it works, and what it's good and bad at
- Uncertainty highlighting: Visually distinguishing confident outputs from uncertain ones
Calibrating Transparency
Too much transparency overwhelms. Too little erodes trust. Calibrate by:
- User expertise: Experts want more detail. Novices want simple signals.
- Task stakes: High-stakes decisions need full transparency. Low-stakes interactions need less.
- Output confidence: Show more transparency when the AI is uncertain, less when it's confident.
- User request: Let users drill into details on demand rather than showing everything upfront.
Transparency Anti-Patterns
- Performative transparency: Showing a reasoning trace that doesn't actually explain the decision
- Buried disclaimers: Putting limitations in fine print nobody reads
- False confidence: The AI sounds certain when it's guessing
- Opaque refusal: "I can't help with that" with no explanation
- Transparency theatre: Making the system look transparent without actually being informative
Design Artefacts
- Transparency level specifications per feature
- Confidence communication guidelines
- Source attribution patterns
- Limitation disclosure templates
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Owl-Listener
- Source: Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.