AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Accessibility Testing Strategy

skill-owl-listener-inclusive-design-skills-accessibility-testing-strategy · by Owl-Listener

Plan what to test, how to test, and who should test for accessibility. Use when defining a testing approach, planning QA, setting up automated and manual testing, or deciding what level of accessibility testing a project needs. Triggers on: accessibility testing, how to test, test plan, automated testing, manual testing, screen reader testing, user testing, accessibility QA, what to test, testing…

— No reviews yet
0 installs
34 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-owl-listener-inclusive-design-skills-accessibility-testing-strategy

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-owl-listener-inclusive-design-skills-accessibility-testing-strategy)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Accessibility Testing Strategy? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Accessibility Testing Strategy

Plan a testing approach that catches real accessibility barriers — because automated tools find roughly 30% of issues. The other 70% require human judgment.

The Testing Pyramid

Layer 1: Automated Testing (Catches ~30%)

What it finds:

  • Missing alt text
  • Colour contrast failures
  • Missing form labels
  • Missing language attribute
  • Empty headings and buttons
  • Duplicate IDs

What it misses:

  • Whether alt text is meaningful
  • Whether focus order is logical
  • Whether content makes sense
  • Whether interactions work with keyboard
  • Whether the experience is usable

Tools: axe, Lighthouse, WAVE, Pa11y, jest-axe When: on every build, in CI/CD pipeline Who: automated — no human needed

Layer 2: Manual Expert Testing (Catches ~50%)

What it finds:

  • Keyboard navigation issues
  • Focus management problems
  • Logical reading order failures
  • Meaningful alt text assessment
  • Cognitive accessibility barriers
  • Interaction pattern issues

Method:

  • Tab through every interactive element
  • Test with screen reader (VoiceOver or NVDA)
  • Test at 200% zoom
  • Test with system preferences enabled
  • Review content for plain language

When: before each release, on major feature changes Who: someone trained in accessibility testing

Layer 3: User Testing With Disabled People (Catches remaining ~20%)

What it finds:

  • Real-world usability barriers that experts miss
  • Assistive technology compatibility issues
  • Unexpected workflows and workarounds
  • Cognitive and emotional barriers
  • Issues that only appear with actual AT proficiency

Method:

  • Recruit participants with diverse disabilities
  • Test core tasks with their own devices and AT
  • Observe — don't guide or explain
  • Record what works, what fails, and what frustrates

When: quarterly, or before major launches Who: users with disabilities using their own setup

What to Test First

Priority 1: Core Tasks

  • Can users complete the primary tasks the product exists for?
  • Test the critical path end to end
  • Any failure here is a launch blocker

Priority 2: Input and Navigation

  • Keyboard-only navigation through the core flow
  • Screen reader navigation through the core flow
  • Touch interaction on mobile for the core flow

Priority 3: Content and Comprehension

  • Is content understandable at the target reading level?
  • Are error messages helpful?
  • Is help available and findable?

Priority 4: Edge Cases and Preferences

  • Zoom to 200%
  • System preferences (reduced motion, high contrast, dark mode)
  • Long content, empty states, error states

Screen Reader Testing Basics

For teams new to screen reader testing:

Start With VoiceOver (Mac)

  • Turn on: Cmd + F5
  • Navigate: VO + arrow keys (VO = Ctrl + Option)
  • Headings: VO + Cmd + H
  • Links: VO + Cmd + L
  • Forms: VO + Cmd + J
  • Turn off: Cmd + F5

Start With NVDA (Windows)

  • Download free from nvaccess.org
  • Navigate: Tab, arrow keys
  • Headings: H
  • Links: K
  • Forms: F
  • Stop speech: Ctrl

What to Listen For

  • Does every interactive element have a name?
  • Are state changes announced (expanded, selected, checked)?
  • Does focus move to the right place after actions?
  • Can you understand the page reading only the headings?

Assessment Questions

  1. Is automated testing running on every build?
  2. Is manual expert testing happening before each release?
  3. Has the product been tested by people with disabilities?
  4. Are core tasks tested with keyboard and screen reader?
  5. Is there a clear priority for what to test first?

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.