AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Plan Writing

skill-paulojalowyj-openkit-plan-writing · by paulojalowyj

Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.

No reviews yet
0 installs
15 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-paulojalowyj-openkit-plan-writing

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Plan Writing? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Plan Writing

> Source: obra/superpowers

Overview

This skill provides a framework for breaking down work into clear, actionable tasks with verification criteria.

Task Breakdown Principles

1. Small, Focused Tasks

  • Each task should take 2-5 minutes
  • One clear outcome per task
  • Independently verifiable

2. Clear Verification

  • How do you know it's done?
  • What can you check/test?
  • What's expected output?

3. Logical Ordering

  • Dependencies identified
  • Parallel work where possible
  • Critical path highlighted
  • Phase X: Verification is always LAST

4. Planning Lives in docs/

5. Question Tool Usage (MANDATORY)

When planning requires user input or decisions:

  • Use question tool for all multi-option scenarios
  • Provide clear options with descriptions
  • For tech stack decisions, structure choices properly

Example:

question({
  questions: [{
      question: "What tech stack?",
      header: "Stack",
      options: [
        { label: "React + FastAPI", description: "Full-stack modern" },
        { label: "Next.js + Node", description: "All-in-one" }
      ]
    }]
})

See .opencode/rules/MASTER.md for complete Question Tool Protocol.

  • Planning artifacts live under docs/requirements/ and docs/sprint/
  • Discovery outputs go to docs/requirements//
  • Sprint planning outputs go to docs/sprint/Sprint-XX/
  • If docs/ does not exist, create it before writing

Planning Principles (NOT Templates!)

> NO fixed templates. Each plan is UNIQUE to the task.

Principle 1: Keep It SHORT

| Wrong | Right | |----------|----------| | 50 tasks with sub-sub-tasks | 5-10 clear tasks max | | Every micro-step listed | Only actionable items | | Verbose descriptions | One-line per task |

> Rule: If plan is longer than 1 page, it's too long. Simplify.


Principle 2: Be SPECIFIC, Not Generic

| Wrong | Right | |----------|----------| | "Set up project" | "Run npx create-next-app" | | "Add authentication" | "Install next-auth, create /api/auth/[...nextauth].ts" | | "Style the UI" | "Add Tailwind classes to Header.tsx" |

> Rule: Each task should have a clear, verifiable outcome.


Principle 3: Dynamic Content Based on Project Type

For NEW PROJECT:

  • What tech stack? (decide first)
  • What's the MVP? (minimal features)
  • What's the file structure?

For FEATURE ADDITION:

  • Which files are affected?
  • What dependencies needed?
  • How to verify it works?

For BUG FIX:

  • What's the root cause?
  • What file/line to change?
  • How to test the fix?

Principle 4: Scripts Are Project-Specific

> DO NOT copy-paste script commands. Choose based on project type.

| Project Type | Relevant Scripts | |--------------|------------------| | Frontend/React | ux_audit.py, accessibility_checker.py | | Backend/API | api_validator.py, security_scan.py | | Mobile | mobile_audit.py | | Database | schema_validator.py | | Full-stack | Mix of above based on what you touched |

Wrong: Adding all scripts to every plan Right: Only scripts relevant to THIS task


Principle 5: Verification is Simple

| Wrong | Right | |----------|----------| | "Verify the component works correctly" | "Run npm run dev, click button, see toast" | | "Test the API" | "curl localhost:3000/api/users returns 200" | | "Check styles" | "Open browser, verify dark mode toggle works" |


Plan Structure (Flexible, Not Fixed!)

# [Task Name]

## Goal
One sentence: What are we building/fixing?

## Tasks
- [ ] Task 1: [Specific action] → Verify: [How to check]
- [ ] Task 2: [Specific action] → Verify: [How to check]
- [ ] Task 3: [Specific action] → Verify: [How to check]

## Done When
- [ ] [Main success criteria]

> That's it. No phases, no sub-sections unless truly needed. > Keep it minimal. Add complexity only when required.

Notes

[Any important considerations]


---

## Best Practices (Quick Reference)

1. **Start with goal** - What are we building/fixing?
2. **Max 10 tasks** - If more, break into multiple plans
3. **Each task verifiable** - Clear "done" criteria
4. **Docs-first** - Requirements in `docs/requirements/`, sprint tasks in `docs/sprint/`
5. **Update as you go** - Mark `[x]` when complete in sprint Tasks

---

## When to Use

- New project from scratch
- Adding a feature
- Fixing a bug (if complex)
- Refactoring multiple files

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [paulojalowyj](https://github.com/paulojalowyj)
- **Source:** [paulojalowyj/openkit](https://github.com/paulojalowyj/openkit)
- **License:** MIT
- **Homepage:** https://linktr.ee/paulojalowyj

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.