AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Plan Writing

skill-matthewbspeicher-remembr-dev-plan-writing · by matthewbspeicher

Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.

No reviews yet
0 installs
23 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-matthewbspeicher-remembr-dev-plan-writing

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures
View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-matthewbspeicher-remembr-dev-plan-writing)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Plan Writing? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Plan Writing

> Source: obra/superpowers

Overview

This skill provides a framework for breaking down work into clear, actionable tasks with verification criteria.

Task Breakdown Principles

1. Small, Focused Tasks

  • Each task should take 2-5 minutes
  • One clear outcome per task
  • Independently verifiable

2. Clear Verification

  • How do you know it's done?
  • What can you check/test?
  • What's the expected output?

3. Logical Ordering

  • Dependencies identified
  • Parallel work where possible
  • Critical path highlighted
  • Phase X: Verification is always LAST

4. Dynamic Naming in Project Root

  • Plan files are saved as {task-slug}.md in the PROJECT ROOT
  • Name derived from task (e.g., "add auth" → auth-feature.md)
  • NEVER inside .claude/, docs/, or temp folders

Planning Principles (NOT Templates!)

> 🔴 NO fixed templates. Each plan is UNIQUE to the task.

Principle 1: Keep It SHORT

| ❌ Wrong | ✅ Right | |----------|----------| | 50 tasks with sub-sub-tasks | 5-10 clear tasks max | | Every micro-step listed | Only actionable items | | Verbose descriptions | One-line per task |

> Rule: If plan is longer than 1 page, it's too long. Simplify.


Principle 2: Be SPECIFIC, Not Generic

| ❌ Wrong | ✅ Right | |----------|----------| | "Set up project" | "Run npx create-next-app" | | "Add authentication" | "Install next-auth, create /api/auth/[...nextauth].ts" | | "Style the UI" | "Add Tailwind classes to Header.tsx" |

> Rule: Each task should have a clear, verifiable outcome.


Principle 3: Dynamic Content Based on Project Type

For NEW PROJECT:

  • What tech stack? (decide first)
  • What's the MVP? (minimal features)
  • What's the file structure?

For FEATURE ADDITION:

  • Which files are affected?
  • What dependencies needed?
  • How to verify it works?

For BUG FIX:

  • What's the root cause?
  • What file/line to change?
  • How to test the fix?

Principle 4: Scripts Are Project-Specific

> 🔴 DO NOT copy-paste script commands. Choose based on project type.

| Project Type | Relevant Scripts | |--------------|------------------| | Frontend/React | ux_audit.py, accessibility_checker.py | | Backend/API | api_validator.py, security_scan.py | | Mobile | mobile_audit.py | | Database | schema_validator.py | | Full-stack | Mix of above based on what you touched |

Wrong: Adding all scripts to every plan Right: Only scripts relevant to THIS task


Principle 5: Verification is Simple

| ❌ Wrong | ✅ Right | |----------|----------| | "Verify the component works correctly" | "Run npm run dev, click button, see toast" | | "Test the API" | "curl localhost:3000/api/users returns 200" | | "Check styles" | "Open browser, verify dark mode toggle works" |


Plan Structure (Flexible, Not Fixed!)

# [Task Name]

## Goal
One sentence: What are we building/fixing?

## Tasks
- [ ] Task 1: [Specific action] → Verify: [How to check]
- [ ] Task 2: [Specific action] → Verify: [How to check]
- [ ] Task 3: [Specific action] → Verify: [How to check]

## Done When
- [ ] [Main success criteria]

> That's it. No phases, no sub-sections unless truly needed. > Keep it minimal. Add complexity only when required.

Notes

[Any important considerations]


---

## Best Practices (Quick Reference)

1. **Start with goal** - What are we building/fixing?
2. **Max 10 tasks** - If more, break into multiple plans
3. **Each task verifiable** - Clear "done" criteria
4. **Project-specific** - No copy-paste templates
5. **Update as you go** - Mark `[x]` when complete

---

## When to Use

- New project from scratch
- Adding a feature
- Fixing a bug (if complex)
- Refactoring multiple files

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [matthewbspeicher](https://github.com/matthewbspeicher)
- **Source:** [matthewbspeicher/remembr-dev](https://github.com/matthewbspeicher/remembr-dev)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.