Install
$ agentstack add skill-prodazhang-aigd-aigd-sync ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
AIGD · sync (sync-back integration) [minimal skeleton]
> Package contract: install the whole aigd package (the orchestrator aigd/+references/ and the 6 sub-skills (including aigd-ui-capture) placed at the same level in this environment's skills directory, following the host agent, e.g. Claude Code's .claude/skills/), don't copy this skill alone — this package's sub-skills rely on aigd/ at the same level to fetch the methodology, copying it alone breaks the link.
Positioning
Cross-cutting action (not a linear "step 5"): triggered after every system's handoff, a continuous / milestone-style sync-back. Writes each single system's results back to the project layer, keeping the spine consistent with the whole; manages "downstream impact".
Read / produce / write back
- Read: the
manifest(full), each system's status, theproject charter. - Produce / change:
- Global-spec consolidation (enums / number ranges / units deduplicated and aligned).
spec/integration-acceptance.md(land the results of the "integration check" below into cross-system acceptance; theimplementation master guidepoints to it).- Overall prototype (integration demo) — a single html file, placed where the project charter "directory layout" specifies (engineering layout →
docs/prototypes/). impl-overview.md(handoff-package entry point: the start-here for downstream AI).- Write back: ① shared item changed → per "recipe 4" reverse-look-up in two categories (point-to-point → table A "depended-on-by (downstream)" / broadcast-type → table C "referenced shared source of truth") → mark affected already-finalized systems
Recheck(record in table D); ② recheck passed → that systemRecheck → Final, refresh table D's finalization time (= this recheck's confirmation time) — this is the only exit from theRecheckstate; not handling it leaves that state hanging forever.
Recipe
- After a system is finalized: absorb its enums / number ranges into the global spec.
- Merge that system into the overall prototype (integration demo).
- Refresh the implementation master guide (system list / build order / contract locations / acceptance entry).
- Run downstream impact, in two categories (each reverse-looks-up a different column):
- Point-to-point system edge (one system's output consumed by several others) changed → reverse-look-up table A "depended-on-by (downstream)", mark those few downstream
Recheck(record in table D). - Broadcast-type shared source of truth (enums / text structure / id namespace, see manifest table F) changed → backward-compatible (pure append) needs no recheck; breaking change → reverse-look-up table C "referenced shared source of truth" to find the systems that listed it (broadcast-type sources aren't in table A "depended-on-by") → mark those systems
Recheckin table D, don't blow up the whole table.
- Recheck the
Rechecksystems: verify whether their references to the "changed shared item" still hold → if they hold, status back toFinal, refresh table D; if not, bounce (back to iterate/concept, and per the bounce rules cascade to its downstream again).
Integration check (must run every time — meso-layer (inter-system combination) post-hoc gate; the up-front design of combination points is in concept)
- [ ] The enums system A produces — do the fields align when B consumes them?
- [ ] Do A's config primary keys exist in B's reference table?
- [ ] Is there a deadlock in the A↔B state machines (A waits for B, B waits for A)?
- [ ] Does the core loop (minimal playable closed loop) cover all systems?
Any one failing → flag the problem, go back to the relevant system (back to concept if needed), and write the result into spec/integration-acceptance.md.
Admission / exit
- Admission: a system has changed to
Final, or some shared item has changed, or there areRechecksystems pending verification. - Exit: global spec consolidated + overall prototype updated + implementation master guide refreshed + affected systems marked
Recheck+ theRechecksystems selected for recheck settled (pass →Final/ fail → bounce).
Boundary
Only does project-layer sync-back and consistency maintenance, doesn't design new systems (that's concept/system).
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ProdaZhang
- Source: ProdaZhang/aigd
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.