Install
$ agentstack add skill-product-on-purpose-pm-skills-develop-design-rationale ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Design Rationale
A design rationale document captures the "why" behind design decisions.the context, constraints, alternatives considered, and reasoning that led to a particular solution. While designs themselves show what was built, rationale documents preserve institutional knowledge about why it was built that way.
When to Use
- When making significant UX decisions that affect user experience
- Before design reviews to prepare stakeholder discussions
- When multiple valid approaches exist and the choice needs justification
- To onboard new team members to existing design decisions
- When revisiting past decisions to understand original reasoning
- During design system evolution to document pattern choices
When NOT to Use
- The decision is architectural or a technology selection -> use
develop-adr(Nygard format) - You need stakeholder alignment on the overall solution direction -> use
develop-solution-brief - You are documenting exploration findings rather than a decision -> use
develop-spike-summary - The decision is trivially reversible and low-stakes: a rationale document adds ceremony; record the reasoning in the PR or ticket instead
Instructions
When asked to document design rationale, follow these steps:
- State the Decision
Begin with a clear, one-sentence summary of what design decision was made. This becomes the title and reference point for the document.
- Describe the Context
Explain the situation that prompted this decision. What problem were you solving? What constraints existed? What user needs informed the direction? Include relevant research findings.
- List Options Considered
Document at least 2-3 alternatives that were evaluated. For each option, describe what it would look like and its key characteristics. Be fair to all options.avoid strawmen.
- Define Evaluation Criteria
Specify how options were assessed: usability heuristics, technical feasibility, brand alignment, user research findings, business requirements, or design principles.
- Explain the Reasoning
Walk through why the chosen option best meets the criteria. Be explicit about trade-offs.what you gained and what you sacrificed. Acknowledge where the decision is reversible vs. irreversible.
- Document Trade-offs Accepted
Every design decision involves trade-offs. Name what you gave up and why it was acceptable. This honesty helps future teams understand constraints.
- Note Follow-up Considerations
Capture anything that needs attention later: metrics to watch, conditions that might warrant revisiting the decision, or related decisions to make.
Output Format
Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete rationale fills every template section: Decision Summary; Context; Options Considered; Evaluation; Decision Rationale; Trade-offs Accepted; Reversibility; Follow-up Considerations; Supporting Materials; and Decision History.
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing, verify:
- [ ] Decision is clearly stated in one sentence
- [ ] Context explains the "why now" and constraints
- [ ] Multiple alternatives are documented fairly
- [ ] Evaluation criteria are explicit
- [ ] Reasoning addresses why chosen option beats alternatives
- [ ] Trade-offs are honestly acknowledged
- [ ] A reader who inherits this design can reconstruct why the chosen option won without asking anyone
Examples
See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: product-on-purpose
- Source: product-on-purpose/pm-skills
- License: Apache-2.0
- Homepage: https://product-on-purpose.github.io/pm-skills/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.