AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Develop Design Rationale

skill-product-on-purpose-pm-skills-develop-design-rationale · by product-on-purpose

Documents the reasoning behind design decisions including alternatives considered, trade-offs evaluated, and principles applied. Use when making significant UX decisions, aligning with stakeholders on design direction, or preserving design context for future reference.

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-product-on-purpose-pm-skills-develop-design-rationale

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-product-on-purpose-pm-skills-develop-design-rationale)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Develop Design Rationale? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Design Rationale

A design rationale document captures the "why" behind design decisions.the context, constraints, alternatives considered, and reasoning that led to a particular solution. While designs themselves show what was built, rationale documents preserve institutional knowledge about why it was built that way.

When to Use

  • When making significant UX decisions that affect user experience
  • Before design reviews to prepare stakeholder discussions
  • When multiple valid approaches exist and the choice needs justification
  • To onboard new team members to existing design decisions
  • When revisiting past decisions to understand original reasoning
  • During design system evolution to document pattern choices

When NOT to Use

  • The decision is architectural or a technology selection -> use develop-adr (Nygard format)
  • You need stakeholder alignment on the overall solution direction -> use develop-solution-brief
  • You are documenting exploration findings rather than a decision -> use develop-spike-summary
  • The decision is trivially reversible and low-stakes: a rationale document adds ceremony; record the reasoning in the PR or ticket instead

Instructions

When asked to document design rationale, follow these steps:

  1. State the Decision

Begin with a clear, one-sentence summary of what design decision was made. This becomes the title and reference point for the document.

  1. Describe the Context

Explain the situation that prompted this decision. What problem were you solving? What constraints existed? What user needs informed the direction? Include relevant research findings.

  1. List Options Considered

Document at least 2-3 alternatives that were evaluated. For each option, describe what it would look like and its key characteristics. Be fair to all options.avoid strawmen.

  1. Define Evaluation Criteria

Specify how options were assessed: usability heuristics, technical feasibility, brand alignment, user research findings, business requirements, or design principles.

  1. Explain the Reasoning

Walk through why the chosen option best meets the criteria. Be explicit about trade-offs.what you gained and what you sacrificed. Acknowledge where the decision is reversible vs. irreversible.

  1. Document Trade-offs Accepted

Every design decision involves trade-offs. Name what you gave up and why it was acceptable. This honesty helps future teams understand constraints.

  1. Note Follow-up Considerations

Capture anything that needs attention later: metrics to watch, conditions that might warrant revisiting the decision, or related decisions to make.

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete rationale fills every template section: Decision Summary; Context; Options Considered; Evaluation; Decision Rationale; Trade-offs Accepted; Reversibility; Follow-up Considerations; Supporting Materials; and Decision History.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • [ ] Decision is clearly stated in one sentence
  • [ ] Context explains the "why now" and constraints
  • [ ] Multiple alternatives are documented fairly
  • [ ] Evaluation criteria are explicit
  • [ ] Reasoning addresses why chosen option beats alternatives
  • [ ] Trade-offs are honestly acknowledged
  • [ ] A reader who inherits this design can reconstruct why the chosen option won without asking anyone

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.