Install
$ agentstack add skill-rfstudioco-agentic-growth-team-pricing-page-optimizer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Pricing Page Optimizer (Revenue Squad)
Audits pricing with a pricing-psychology + conversion lens, then rewrites the page.
Triggers
- "audit our pricing page"
- "rewrite pricing"
- "are we priced right"
- "help with repackaging"
- "why do people bounce from pricing"
Inputs required
- Pricing page URL or screenshot
- Current plan / price structure — names, prices, what's included
- Competitor pricing — 2–5 competitors' public pricing pages
- Customer mix — % on each plan, avg ARPU
- Who lands here — segment + funnel stage
- Conversion rate — pricing page → trial / purchase
Process
Step 1 — Audit plan structure
Check for:
- Plan count — 3 is the sweet spot; 4 only if you have a distinct enterprise tier
- Decoy effect — is the middle plan clearly the best value?
- Anchoring — is the highest plan visible enough to anchor high?
- Usage-based vs. seat-based — does the structure match how customers actually grow?
- Annual discount — is it compelling (≥ 15%)? Is the default toggle annual or monthly?
Step 2 — Audit naming
Plans named by:
- Persona (Solo / Team / Business) — usually best for self-serve
- Scale (Starter / Pro / Enterprise) — classic
- Use case (Build / Ship / Scale) — aspirational
Avoid cute names that require explanation. "Hobbyist / Pro / Enterprise" beats "Acorn / Oak / Forest" every time.
Step 3 — Audit the feature matrix
- Matrix must be scannable in 10 seconds
- Most important differentiator at the top
- Checkmark-only rows with no numbers make plans feel identical — add quantified differences (5 projects vs. unlimited)
- Unlimited should be at the top tier only
Step 4 — Audit hero + CTA
- Hero answers "who is each plan for" in one line per plan
- Each plan has ONE CTA — not "Start trial" AND "Contact sales"
- Free tier / trial CTA is dominant
- No pricing below the fold
Step 5 — Audit objection handling
- FAQ below the table covering: refunds, annual switching, team billing, security/compliance, trial terms
- Social proof section (logos + 1 quote per plan tier where possible)
- Money-back / trial guarantee
Step 6 — Rewrite
Produce a rewritten pricing page with:
- Rewritten hero line per plan
- Cleaned feature matrix (flag rows to cut, rows to add)
- Rewritten CTAs
- Suggested FAQ items
- Before → after for each change with rationale
Step 7 — Test plan
Recommend 1–2 A/B tests (plan name swap, annual-default toggle, CTA copy). Hand to A/B Test Designer.
Output artifact
pricing-audit.md with score card + rewrites + test plan.
Handoff
- Rewrites → eng / design
- Test plan → A/B Test Designer
- Plan-mix shift implications → Revenue Dashboard Builder
Example call
> "Audit acme.com/pricing. We have Free / Pro ($20) / Business ($80) / Enterprise (call us). 80% of paid users are on Pro. Competitors: linear.app, asana.com. Page CVR is 4% pricing → trial."
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rfstudioco
- Source: rfstudioco/agenticgrowth_team
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://rfstudio.co
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.