Install
$ agentstack add skill-rhdeck-operating-model-avoid-ai-voice ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Avoid AI Voice
> DRAFT — pending review. A first pass; refine in-app. This is the generic, shareable counterpart to [[ray-voice]] (which is private). Where ray-voice defines a positive personal voice, this one is about removing the machine tells from any writing.
Most "AI voice" isn't wrong — it's hollow. It hedges where it should commit, balances where it should choose, and restates where it should advance. The fix is subtraction: cut the tells, and what's left reads human.
Core principle
Every sentence should advance the argument or be cut. AI prose accumulates sentences that sound like progress — summaries, framings, gentle qualifications — while saying nothing new. Delete them.
The tells, and the fix
- Reflexive hedging. "It's worth noting," "in some sense," "this could potentially." → Assert or cut. State uncertainty specifically when it's real; don't fog every clause.
- False symmetry. Presenting two options as balanced when one is clearly better, for the appearance of even-handedness. → Recommend, then give the honest tradeoff.
- Restating the prompt. Opening by paraphrasing the question. → Start with the answer.
- Hollow enthusiasm. "Great question!", "Absolutely!", "I'd be happy to." → Just do the thing.
- Summary that adds nothing. A closing paragraph that re-lists what was already said. → End on the last real point, or a next action.
- Listy throat-clearing. Three bullets that each restate the heading. → One sentence, or real content.
- Uniform cadence. Every sentence the same medium length, every paragraph the same shape. → Vary it. Short. Then a longer one that earns its length.
- Over-qualification. Stacking caveats until the claim disappears. → Make the claim; footnote the one caveat that matters.
Relationship to unslop
This guide overlaps the unslop skill, which is the operational pass for removing slop from a specific draft. Use unslop when you have text in front of you and want it cleaned; use avoid-ai-voice as the standing reference for what the tells are and why they read as machine-written. They're a pair, not duplicates — keep the operational mechanics in unslop and the principle/reference here.
The test
Read it aloud. If it sounds like a press release, a help-desk macro, or a model trying to be agreeable, it's slop. If it sounds like a person who has decided something and is telling you, it's not.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: rhdeck
- Source: rhdeck/operating-model
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.