AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Patent Specification Writer

skill-seed-forge-harness-ai-kit-patent-specification-writer · by seed-forge

Draft Chinese patent specification sections for invention, utility model, or design submissions, especially background technology and technical solution writeups, with intake guidance, prior-art-oriented analysis, terminology consistency, and document-ready output. Excludes claims drafting. Use when the user wants 专利说明书、背景技术描述、技术方案撰写、交底书整理或发明点梳理。

No reviews yet
0 installs
20 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-seed-forge-harness-ai-kit-patent-specification-writer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-seed-forge-harness-ai-kit-patent-specification-writer)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Patent Specification Writer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Patent Specification Writer

Draft the main explanatory sections of a Chinese patent specification from technical disclosures or rough invention notes.

Use This Skill For

  • 专利说明书撰写
  • 技术交底书整理为说明书内容
  • 背景技术描述
  • 技术方案、关键点、技术效果梳理
  • 发明、实用新型、外观相关说明材料整理

Do not use this skill for formal claims drafting, legal opinions, infringement analysis, or filing strategy advice.

Scope Boundary

This skill focuses on:

  • 背景技术描述
  • 技术方案撰写
  • 关键创新点提炼
  • 技术效果说明
  • 术语一致性与文档整理

It does not draft 权利要求书 as a primary deliverable.

Workflow

1. Intake the Technical Disclosure

First confirm or infer:

  1. 专利类型
  2. 核心创新点
  3. 所属技术领域
  4. 要解决的技术问题
  5. 相对现有技术的优势
  6. 技术效果

If the user information is incomplete, ask only for the most decision-critical missing items.

Prioritize questions about:

  • 技术背景
  • 现有问题
  • 解决方案
  • 创新点
  • 预期效果

2. Extract Search Terms and Prior-Art Angles

Derive 2-5 high-value technical keywords from the disclosure.

If web search or research tools are available, use them to check:

  • related prior art
  • similar domestic and international solutions
  • current technical development in the field

Summarize:

  • mainstream technical routes
  • representative products or methods
  • maturity stage of the field
  • major limitations in existing approaches

If external search is not available in the current environment, say clearly that the analysis is based on user-provided material only.

3. Draft Background Technology

Write:

(1)本发明所属技术领域
  • Use 1-2 precise sentences
  • Prefer the pattern:

本发明属于[大领域],尤其涉及[具体细分领域]

(2)该行业的技术发展现状
  • Explain development background
  • Introduce current mainstream routes
  • Mention representative existing technologies when supported
  • Explain application scenarios and practical demand
(3)现有技术中存在的缺陷
  • Analyze concrete limitations in current approaches
  • Discuss from technical effect, scope, cost, implementation complexity, or reliability
  • Make the real-world consequences explicit
  • Prepare the logic for introducing the invention

Keep this section objective and evidence-aware.

4. Draft the Technical Solution

Write:

(1)本发明采用的技术方案
  • Open with:

本发明提供一种[技术方案名称],旨在解决[技术问题]

  • Prefer step-based or module-based explanation
  • Clarify:
  • structure or composition
  • function of components or steps
  • data flow or process flow
  • key principle or algorithm when needed
  • Use strong logical connectors such as:

首先 然后 接着 最后

The description should be detailed enough that a skilled person could understand how to implement it.

(2)本发明的关键点
  • Extract 3-5 core innovation points
  • Label each as 【关键点X】
  • For each one, explain:
  • technical feature
  • difference from prior art
  • concrete problem solved
(3)本发明的技术效果
  • Open with:

本发明相较于现有技术,具有以下技术效果:

  • Use itemized statements
  • For each effect, explain:
  • effect description
  • technical reason behind it
  • supporting data or examples if available

Each effect should map back to a defect raised in the background section.

5. Integrate and Polish the Document

Before delivery:

  • align terminology throughout
  • check section logic
  • remove marketing tone
  • ensure the invention is described technically, not as vague business value
  • add notes on missing evidence or still-needed material where necessary

Default Output Structure

一、背景技术描述

(1)本发明所属技术领域
[内容]

(2)该行业的技术发展现状
[内容]

(3)现有技术中存在的缺陷
[内容]

二、本发明的技术方案

(1)本发明采用的技术方案
[内容]

(2)本发明的关键点
[内容]

(3)本发明的技术效果
[内容]

Also include, when useful:

  • 修改建议
  • 待补充材料
  • 术语统一建议

Writing Rules

  • Use Chinese unless the user asks otherwise
  • Stay technical, precise, and non-promotional
  • Do not fabricate data, patents, or prior-art references
  • Distinguish clearly between verified material, user-provided assertions, and editorial synthesis
  • When uncertainty remains, mark it conservatively instead of pretending it is settled

推荐输出格式

执行完毕后按以下结构输出:

状态:✅ 成功 / ⚠️ 部分成功 / ❌ 失败

| | | 说明 | |------|------|------|

下一步

Final Quality Check

Before delivering, verify:

  • the technical field is stated precisely
  • the background explains real industry context rather than empty generalities
  • prior-art defects are concrete and usable
  • the technical solution is logically structured and implementable
  • the innovation points are specific rather than slogan-like
  • the technical effects correspond to the identified defects
  • the document does not drift into claim drafting

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.