Install
$ agentstack add skill-shinpr-codex-workflows-task-analyzer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Task Analyzer
Provides task analysis and skill selection guidance.
Skills Index
See [skills-index.yaml](references/skills-index.yaml) for available skills metadata.
Task Analysis Process
1. Understand Task Essence [MANDATORY]
Identify the fundamental purpose beyond surface-level work:
| Surface Work | Fundamental Purpose | |--------------|---------------------| | "Fix this bug" | Problem solving, root cause analysis | | "Implement this feature" | Feature addition, value delivery | | "Refactor this code" | Quality improvement, maintainability | | "Update this file" | Change management, consistency |
Key Questions [MUST answer before proceeding]:
- What problem are we really solving?
- What is the expected outcome?
- What could go wrong if we approach this superficially?
2. Estimate Task Scale
| Scale | File Count | Indicators | |-------|------------|------------| | Small | 1-2 | Single function/component change | | Medium | 3-5 | Multiple related components | | Large | 6+ | Cross-cutting concerns, architecture impact |
Scale affects skill priority:
- Larger scale: process/documentation skills more important
- Smaller scale: implementation skills more focused
3. Identify Task Type
| Type | Characteristics | Key Skills | |------|-----------------|------------| | Implementation | New code, features | coding-rules, testing | | Fix | Bug resolution | ai-development-guide, testing | | Refactoring | Structure improvement | coding-rules, ai-development-guide | | Design | Architecture decisions | documentation-criteria, implementation-approach | | Quality | Testing, review | testing, integration-e2e-testing |
4. Tag-Based Skill Matching
Extract relevant tags from task description and match against skills-index.yaml:
Task: "Implement user authentication with tests"
Extracted tags: [implementation, testing, security]
Matched skills:
- coding-rules (implementation, security)
- testing (testing)
- ai-development-guide (implementation)
5. Implicit Relationships
Consider hidden dependencies:
| Task Involves | Also Include | |---------------|--------------| | Error handling | debugging, testing | | New features | design, implementation, documentation | | Performance | profiling, optimization, testing | | Frontend | coding-rules/references/typescript.md, testing/references/typescript.md | | API/Integration | integration-e2e-testing |
Skill Selection Priority
- Essential - Directly related to task type
- Quality - Testing and quality assurance
- Process - Workflow and documentation
- Supplementary - Reference and best practices
Output Format
Return structured analysis with skill metadata from skills-index.yaml:
taskAnalysis:
essence: # Fundamental purpose identified
type:
scale:
estimatedFiles:
tags: [, ...] # Extracted from task description
selectedSkills:
- skill: # From skills-index.yaml
priority:
reason: # Why this skill was selected
tags: [...]
typical-use:
size:
sections: [...] # Full section list from yaml
references: [...] # Full reference file list from yaml when present
Note: Section and reference selection (choosing which sections or reference files are relevant) is done after reading the actual SKILL.md files. For output-format templates, read only the reference files matching the document type being created or reviewed.
Metacognitive Question Design
Generate 3-5 questions according to task nature:
| Task Type | Question Focus | |-----------|----------------| | Implementation | Design validity, edge cases, performance | | Fix | Root cause (5 Whys), impact scope, regression testing | | Refactoring | Current problems, target state, phased plan | | Design | Requirement clarity, future extensibility, trade-offs |
Warning Patterns [MANDATORY to detect]
Detect and flag these patterns IMMEDIATELY:
| Pattern | Warning | REQUIRED Action | |---------|---------|-----------------| | Large change at once | High risk | MUST split into phases | | Implementation without tests | Quality risk | MUST follow TDD | | Immediate fix on error | Root cause missed | MUST pause and analyze with 5 Whys | | Coding without plan | Scope creep | MUST plan first |
ENFORCEMENT: Detecting ANY warning pattern requires IMMEDIATE corrective action
Common Decision Points
| Decision | Criteria | |----------|----------| | Need documentation? | Check documentation-criteria decision matrix | | Which implementation approach? | Check implementation-approach phases | | How to test? | Check testing + integration-e2e-testing | | Code quality concerns? | Check ai-development-guide anti-patterns | | Frontend specific? | Check coding-rules/references/typescript.md |
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: shinpr
- Source: shinpr/codex-workflows
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.