AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Analyze Performance

skill-techwolf-ai-ai-first-toolkit-analyze-performance · by techwolf-ai

Analyze engagement patterns across published posts to identify what works. Use when asked to review performance, find successful patterns, or optimize future content.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
34 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-techwolf-ai-ai-first-toolkit-analyze-performance

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-techwolf-ai-ai-first-toolkit-analyze-performance)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Analyze Performance? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Analyze Content Performance

Identify patterns in high-performing posts to inform future content strategy.

Process

  1. Run ./scripts/print-published.sh linkedin-post to read all published LinkedIn posts
  2. Extract posts that have engagement data (engagement.reactions, engagement.views, etc.)
  3. Analyze patterns across high-performing vs low-performing posts

Analysis Dimensions

Hook Analysis

  • What hook styles correlate with higher engagement?
  • Personal anecdote vs company experience vs surprising data vs news hook?
  • First 210 characters (LinkedIn cutoff) - what patterns work?

Content Characteristics

  • Word count vs engagement correlation
  • Use of concrete examples vs abstract concepts
  • Presence of frameworks or mental models
  • Use of lists/structure vs flowing narrative

Topic Analysis

  • Which tags correlate with higher engagement?
  • Which themes resonate most?
  • Timing patterns (if publishedDate available)

Structural Patterns

  • Opening style (question, statement, story)
  • Closing style (call-to-action, reflection, question)
  • Paragraph length and density

Performance Tiers

Categorize posts by reaction count:

  • High performers: 100+ reactions
  • Medium performers: 30-99 reactions
  • Lower performers: <30 reactions

Output Format

Provide:

  1. Summary statistics - Total posts analyzed, average engagement by tier
  2. Top performers - List highest-engagement posts with their key characteristics
  3. Pattern insights - What distinguishes high vs lower performers?
  4. Recommendations - Actionable suggestions for future content

Example Analysis Output

## Performance Summary
- Posts analyzed: 12 (with engagement data)
- High performers (100+): 3 posts
- Medium performers (30-99): 5 posts
- Lower performers (<30): 4 posts

## Top Performers
1. "Title" - 245 reactions
   - Hook: Personal anecdote
   - Topic: AI productivity
   - Word count: 180

## Key Patterns
- Personal anecdotes in the first sentence correlate with 2x higher engagement
- Posts with concrete examples outperform abstract posts by 40%
- Optimal word count appears to be 150-200 words

## Recommendations
1. Lead with personal or company-specific openings
2. Include at least one specific example or data point
3. Keep total length under 220 words

Notes

  • Only analyze posts with engagement data (skip posts without metrics)
  • Correlation is not causation - note patterns but don't overclaim
  • Consider recency bias - newer posts may still be accumulating engagement

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.