— No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install
Install
$ agentstack add skill-thecraighewitt-cowork-starter-pack-meeting-prep ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Are you the author of Meeting Prep? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claimAbout
Meeting Prep
Walk into every meeting knowing who you're talking to and why. Two minutes of reading instead of 20 minutes of panicky tab-opening.
Before starting
- Read
context/about-me.md— to frame the meeting from the user's side - Read
context/preferences.md— format defaults - Ask the user which meeting if it's not obvious. Calendar title is best; date + attendee name works.
- Check the project folder for any prior notes on this attendee or topic
What to produce
A markdown file saved to /output/meeting-prep-{YYYY-MM-DD}-{attendee-or-topic}.md with five sections:
- Who's in the room — attendee(s), their role, their company, anything notable from past interactions. One paragraph per person.
- Where we left off — the last time this person or topic came up. Pull from email threads, prior meeting notes, any project docs. Summarize. This is the most valuable section — it's the context the user forgot.
- What's likely on their mind — your read of what the attendee is probably coming to discuss, based on the thread, the calendar invite, any recent context. Hedge when you're guessing. Say "likely" not "will."
- What to ask or propose — 3 sharp questions or proposals for the user to drive the conversation with. Specific to this person and this context, not generic "what are your goals."
- Red flags / things to not miss — if there are open questions, pending decisions, or sensitive topics, list them. Include any prior commitments the user made to this person that haven't been fulfilled.
Inputs
- The calendar event (required — title, attendees, description)
- Email threads with the attendees in the last 90 days (via Gmail connector)
- Any prior meeting notes in the project folder or
/output/ - Any relevant project docs the user has referenced
How it works
- Get the meeting from the calendar — parse title, attendees, time, any linked docs
- For each external attendee, search email for the last 90 days — pull the most recent substantive thread
- Search the project folder for any prior mention of the person or the company
- Read prior meeting-prep or meeting-debrief files for this person if they exist
- Synthesize the five sections — keep each one tight
- Save the file, tell the user one-line what's most important ("Heads up — she emailed last week with an unresolved question about pricing. I've flagged it in red flags.")
What not to do
- Do not include the entire email thread. Summarize.
- Do not invent background on the attendees. If you don't know something, don't make it up.
- Do not write generic questions. "What are your priorities?" is useless. "You mentioned last quarter you were rebuilding ops — where did that land?" is useful.
- Do not skip the red flags section even if you don't think there are any. Say "no open items" if that's the case — but check first.
Example output structure
# Meeting Prep — 2026-04-18 — Sarah Chen (Northwind)
## Who's in the room
**Sarah Chen** — VP of Operations at Northwind. A 200-person B2B SaaS, mid-market workflow tools. You met her at SaaStr last fall. She owns ops, RevOps, and half of finance. Direct communicator, impatient with filler.
## Where we left off
Last substantive thread was 2026-03-22. She asked for references on the implementation timeline for a team her size. You sent two — she replied "thanks, reviewing" and went quiet. No follow-up from either side.
Prior call (2026-02-15) — she said budget approval was "likely by end of Q1" and she'd come back with a signed SOW or a clear no. Q1 ended; no update.
## What's likely on their mind
Either she's ready to sign and wants to walk through implementation, *or* something internal blocked it and this call is a re-evaluation. The fact that she requested the call (not you) tilts toward the first.
## What to ask or propose
1. "Where did the Q1 budget conversation land?" — open with the elephant.
2. "If we sign this quarter, what's your internal rollout timeline?" — test for real momentum.
3. "What's one thing that would make this a no for you?" — surfaces objections early.
## Red flags
- You promised to send an implementation timeline customized to their team size. You sent references instead. She may ask.
- Legal review was pending on your side last time. Check with Alex before the call.
Customization notes
- Recurring 1-1s. If this is a recurring meeting with the same person, lean hard on "where we left off." Pull from the last 2–3 meeting-debrief files for this person.
- First meetings. Section 2 ("where we left off") becomes "what we know about them" — LinkedIn, company, any public mentions.
- Internal meetings. Skip section 3 ("what's likely on their mind") if it's a routine internal — it adds noise.
- Pitch/sales meetings. Add a sixth section: "Objections to be ready for" — based on prior thread and common patterns.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: TheCraigHewitt
- Source: TheCraigHewitt/cowork-starter-pack
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.