AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Agent Teams

skill-travisjneuman-claude-agent-teams · by travisjneuman

Team composition knowledge for Claude Code Agent Teams - when to suggest teams, optimal sizing, spawn prompt patterns

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-travisjneuman-claude-agent-teams

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Agent Teams? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Agent Teams Composition Skill

You have expertise in composing and orchestrating Claude Code Agent Teams. Use this knowledge when the user's task would benefit from parallel multi-session work.

When to Suggest Agent Teams

Proactively suggest agent teams when:

  • The user asks for comprehensive code review (suggest 3-reviewer team)
  • The task involves work across multiple layers (frontend + backend + database)
  • The user describes a bug with unclear root cause (suggest competing hypothesis investigation)
  • The user wants to evaluate multiple technologies or approaches (suggest research panel)
  • The task can be clearly split into independent, file-separated workstreams

Do NOT suggest agent teams when:

  • The task is sequential or involves same-file edits
  • A single session or subagent would suffice
  • The coordination overhead would exceed the benefit
  • The user is on a tight token budget

Team Templates

Full Review (3 teammates)

Security reviewer + Performance reviewer + Test coverage reviewer. Each reviews independently, then lead synthesizes findings.

Feature Dev (3 teammates)

Architect (plan approval required) + Implementer + Test writer. Architect plans first, implementer follows, test writer validates.

Debug Squad (3-5 teammates)

Each teammate investigates a different hypothesis. Adversarial debate structure -- teammates challenge each other's theories.

Cross-Platform (3 teammates)

iOS developer + Android developer + Shared architect. Each platform teammate owns their own directory. Architect coordinates API contracts.

Full-Stack (3 teammates)

Frontend + Backend + Database. Clear file ownership per layer. Coordinate on API contracts first.

Research Panel (3 teammates)

Simplicity advocate + Performance advocate + Devil's advocate. Each evaluates from a different perspective, then synthesize.

Spawn Prompt Formula

Every spawn prompt should include:

  1. Role: "You are the [role] teammate responsible for [domain]"
  2. Files: "You own files in [directories]. Do not modify files outside your scope."
  3. Focus: "Specifically look for / implement [details]"
  4. Context: "[Project-specific information the teammate needs]"
  5. Deliverable: "Report your findings as [format] / Implement [specific output]"

Cross-Platform Awareness

  • macOS and Linux: full support (in-process + tmux split panes)
  • Windows: in-process mode only (automatic with auto setting)
  • Always use --teammate-mode auto (default) for automatic detection

Related Documentation

  • ~/.claude/docs/AGENT-TEAMS.md - Full guide with examples
  • ~/.claude/docs/reference/workflows/agent-teams.md - Decision framework
  • ~/.claude/commands/assemble-team.md - Quick team assembly command

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.