AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Validation Interview

skill-uthumany-uthy-legacy-os-validation-interview · by uthumany

Test prototypes and concepts with customer interviews. Use when you have a solution concept or prototype and need to validate assumptions before building.

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-uthumany-uthy-legacy-os-validation-interview

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Validation Interview? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Validation Interview

Overview

Validation interviews are not the same as discovery interviews. In discovery, you explore the problem. In validation, you present a proposed solution and gauge whether it works. This skill covers concept testing, prototype testing, and usability interview techniques.

When to Use

  • You have a prototype or concept to test with real users
  • You need to validate assumptions before committing to build
  • You want to catch usability issues before shipping
  • You're practicing continuous discovery — testing solutions as you design them
  • Don't use for: early-stage discovery (use customer-interviews skill), quantitative validation (use A/B tests), or sales demos (different goal)

Instructions

1. Prepare the Interview

Define the goal: What specific assumptions are you testing?

Choose the method:

  • Concept test: Show a description or mockup. Test desirability and comprehension.
  • Prototype test: Let them use an interactive prototype. Test usability and flow.
  • Wizard of Oz: Pretend the product works. Test the core value hypothesis.

Write the script:

  • Opening: "I'm going to show you something we're thinking about building. I want your honest reaction — negative feedback is more valuable than positive."
  • For each concept: "Here's the idea. What do you think this does?"
  • For prototypes: "I'd like you to try completing [task]. Please think aloud as you go."
  • Closing: "If this existed today, would you use it? Why or why not?"

2. Conduct the Interview

Do:

  • Let users explore freely before explaining
  • Ask "What would you expect to happen next?"
  • Pay attention to body language and hesitation
  • Encourage criticism: "What's wrong with this?"

Don't:

  • Lead the user through the interface
  • Explain what they missed (until after testing)
  • Get defensive about your design
  • Ask "Do you like it?" (production bias)
  • Over-explain the concept (if it needs explanation, that's a finding)

3. Watch for Warning Signs

  • Polite praise: "That's cool!" → probe for specifics
  • Feature requests: Building features doesn't validate the core problem
  • Confusion: If they don't understand what it does, that's a signal
  • Solution indifference: "I could see this being useful" = not a strong signal

4. Synthesize Results

For each validation interview:

  1. Comprehension check: Did they understand the concept without explanation?
  2. Desirability check: Would they use it? What would it replace?
  3. Usability check: Could they complete tasks independently?
  4. Caveats: What conditions would make them NOT use it?

5. Make a Decision

Patterns across 5+ interviews:

  • ✅ 4/5 understood + expressed desire → proceed
  • 🔄 Mixed signals → iterate prototype and re-test
  • ❌ 3/5 confused or indifferent → reconsider the solution
  • ❌ 5/5 didn't understand → start over with clearer framing

Sample Output

6 concept tests for a "team updates" feature:

  • ✅ Comprehension: 5/6 understood the concept without explanation
  • ✅ Desirability: 4/6 said they'd use it "today"
  • ⚠️ Usability: 3/6 tried to find it in settings, not the project view
  • 🔄 Action: Iterate placement before usability testing. Re-test with 3 more users.

Common Pitfalls

  1. Confirmation seeking — If you're looking for people to validate your idea, you'll hear what you want
  2. Leading the witness — "Don't you think this would save time?" = useless answer
  3. Ignoring the non-verbal — Facial expressions, pauses, and sighs tell you more than words
  4. One interview, one decision — A single validation interview is an anecdote. 5+ is a pattern
  5. Falling in love — If you can't imagine the answer being "kill it," don't interview. You're not ready to hear the truth

Verification Checklist

  • [ ] Interview goal tied to specific assumptions
  • [ ] Script avoids leading questions and solution pitching
  • [ ] Participants represent the target segment
  • [ ] 5+ interviews completed per concept
  • [ ] Results synthesized into go/iterate/kill recommendation
  • [ ] Findings shared with the team before building

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.