AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Whitespace Finder

skill-varunk130-ai-gtm-skill-library-whitespace-finder · by varunk130

Systematic unmet-needs discovery engine that maps gaps between market demand and existing solutions with quantified opportunity scores. Use when: find opportunities, unmet needs, market gaps, opportunity discovery, what should we build, where is the whitespace.

No reviews yet
0 installs
9 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-varunk130-ai-gtm-skill-library-whitespace-finder

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Whitespace Finder? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Whitespace Finder (DEPTH Model)

Map the gap between what the market demands and what exists. Produces quantified, validated opportunity scores for product and GTM decisions.

When to Use

  • New product ideation
  • Feature prioritization against market need
  • Adjacent market exploration
  • Investment thesis validation
  • Pre-PRD opportunity validation

What You'll Need

Critical inputs (ask if not provided):

  • Market or product category to analyze
  • Target customer segment(s)
  • Known competitors (or ask me to research)

Nice-to-have:

  • Signal Radar output (if previously run)
  • JTBD Extractor output (if previously run)
  • Customer feedback or support ticket themes

Process

Step 1: Demand Evidence Collection

Audit demand across 6 evidence channels:

| Channel | What to Look For | Evidence Quality | |---------|-----------------|-----------------| | Community forums (Reddit, HN, Discourse) | Problem-statement posts, workaround discussions | Medium -- shows real pain | | Review mining (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius) | 1-3 star review complaint patterns, missing feature mentions | High -- verified buyers | | Search demand | Volume for problem queries vs. solution queries (gap = unmet need) | High -- quantifiable | | Support tickets | Recurring themes, feature requests, workaround patterns | High -- your own customers | | Analyst reports | Problem statements, unmet need callouts, market gaps cited | High -- expert validation | | Adjacent product requests | Features users ask for that cross product boundaries | Medium -- shows expansion opportunities |

For each channel, extract the top 5 unmet needs with supporting evidence.

Step 2: Gap Matrix Construction

Build a 2D matrix:

  • X-axis: Customer needs/jobs (from research or JTBD Extractor)
  • Y-axis: Existing solutions in market (products, workarounds, manual processes)

Rate each cell: | Rating | Meaning | |--------|---------| | 0 | Completely unaddressed -- no solution exists | | 1 | Poorly addressed -- solutions exist but are inadequate | | 2 | Adequately addressed -- good-enough solutions exist | | 3 | Well addressed -- strong solutions, hard to differentiate |

Whitespace = cells rated 0-1 with strong demand evidence.

Step 3: DEPTH Scoring

Score each whitespace opportunity (1-10):

| Dimension | What It Measures | Scoring Guide | |-----------|-----------------|---------------| | Demand Evidence | Volume and quality of signals indicating real demand | 1=anecdotal, 5=multiple sources, 10=overwhelming evidence | | Existing Solutions | How well current solutions address it (inverse) | 1=well solved, 5=partial solutions, 10=nothing exists | | Pain Intensity | Severity of unmet need | 1=nice-to-have, 5=significant friction, 10=hair-on-fire problem | | Total Addressable Need | Size of population with this unmet need | 1=tiny niche, 5=meaningful segment, 10=mass market | | Hurdle Analysis | Barriers to entry (inverse -- high = low barriers) | 1=massive barriers, 5=moderate effort, 10=easy to enter |

Opportunity Score = (D x 0.25) + (E x 0.20) + (P x 0.25) + (T x 0.15) + (H x 0.15)

Classification:

  • 7.5+ = Prime Opportunity (high confidence, prioritize)
  • 5.0-7.4 = Promising (validate further before committing)
  • Below 5.0 = Marginal (park unless strategic fit is strong)

Step 4: Opportunity Clustering

Group related whitespace opportunities into "opportunity zones" that could be addressed by a single product or feature set. Each zone gets:

  • Combined DEPTH score (weighted average of constituent opportunities)
  • Shared customer segment
  • Common technical requirements
  • Estimated effort to address

Output

Save to outputs/whitespace-[market]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

Deliverables:

  1. Gap Matrix: Heat map of needs vs. solutions with whitespace cells highlighted
  2. Opportunity Scorecards: One per whitespace opportunity with DEPTH scores and evidence citations
  3. Opportunity Zones: Clustered opportunities showing which can be addressed together
  4. Validation Roadmap: Prioritized experiments to validate top opportunities (surveys, prototypes, landing page tests)

Chain Connections

  • Next skill: Run market-analyzer to size the opportunities you discovered
  • Also feeds: position-lock (validated opportunities become positioning targets), battle-scanner (whitespace informs differentiation angles)
  • Enhanced by: Run after signal-radar (signals point to where whitespace may exist)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.