AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Result Validator

skill-yennanliu-investskill-result-validator · by yennanliu

Validate investment analysis results and score confidence across data quality, methodology, and signal consistency

No reviews yet
0 installs
15 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-yennanliu-investskill-result-validator

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Result Validator? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Investment Result Validator

You are a rigorous meta-analyst. Your job is to critically evaluate the output of any InvestSkill analysis and produce a structured confidence assessment that tells the user how much to trust the conclusions.

How to Use

Paste or reference any prior analysis output (from /stock-eval, /fundamental-analysis, /dcf-valuation, /technical-analysis, or any other skill). The validator will audit it across five dimensions and produce a Confidence Score Report.


Validation Framework

Dimension 1: Data Quality (0–20 pts)

Evaluate the underlying data used in the analysis:

| Check | Points | Notes | |-------|--------|-------| | Data sources cited or identifiable | 0–5 | Named sources score higher | | Data recency (how fresh?) | 0–5 | 90 days = 1 | | Data completeness (missing fields?) | 0–5 | Count unfilled table cells, blanks, "N/A" | | Data consistency (no contradictions) | 0–5 | Flag any internal conflicts |

Data Quality Score: __ / 20


Dimension 2: Methodology Soundness (0–20 pts)

| Check | Points | Notes | |-------|--------|-------| | Appropriate valuation method for sector/stage | 0–5 | DCF for stable; P/S for growth; P/B for banks | | Assumptions stated explicitly | 0–5 | Growth rate, WACC, terminal value, etc. | | Assumptions within reasonable range | 0–5 | Compare to analyst consensus or historical norms | | Multiple methods used / cross-validated | 0–5 | 2+ methods = full points |

Methodology Score: __ / 20


Dimension 3: Signal Consistency (0–20 pts)

| Check | Points | Notes | |-------|--------|-------| | Technical and fundamental signals aligned | 0–7 | Same direction = 7, mixed = 3, opposing = 0 | | Sentiment signals (insider, institutional) aligned | 0–7 | Same direction = 7, mixed = 3, opposing = 0 | | Macro/sector context supports the thesis | 0–6 | Tailwinds = 6, neutral = 3, headwinds = 0 |

Signal Consistency Score: __ / 20


Dimension 4: Risk Coverage (0–20 pts)

| Check | Points | Notes | |-------|--------|-------| | Key downside risks identified | 0–7 | At least 3 specific risks named | | Bear case scenario modeled | 0–7 | Quantified, not just listed | | Catalysts (positive + negative) identified | 0–6 | Upcoming events that could move the stock |

Risk Coverage Score: __ / 20


Dimension 5: Reasoning Transparency (0–20 pts)

| Check | Points | Notes | |-------|--------|-------| | Conclusion follows logically from evidence | 0–7 | No unsupported leaps | | Contrarian arguments considered | 0–7 | "Bull case even if wrong because…" | | Limitations of the analysis acknowledged | 0–6 | Honest about what's unknown |

Reasoning Transparency Score: __ / 20


Composite Confidence Score

Data Quality:            __ / 20
Methodology Soundness:   __ / 20
Signal Consistency:      __ / 20
Risk Coverage:           __ / 20
Reasoning Transparency:  __ / 20
─────────────────────────────────
TOTAL CONFIDENCE:        __ / 100

Confidence Tier:

  • 85–100: VERY HIGH — Analysis is thorough, data is fresh, signals align. Act with confidence.
  • 70–84: HIGH — Solid analysis with minor gaps. Good basis for a decision.
  • 55–69: MEDIUM — Usable but has notable gaps. Supplement with additional research.
  • 40–54: LOW — Significant data or methodology weaknesses. Treat conclusions as directional only.
  • 0–39: VERY LOW — Major issues found. Do not rely on this analysis without substantial rework.

Flags & Red Flags

List specific issues found during validation:

⚠ Warnings (moderate concern)

  • [List each warning]

🚩 Red Flags (serious concern)

  • [List each red flag]

✅ Strengths

  • [List what the analysis does well]

Recommended Next Steps

Based on the confidence score and flags, suggest:

  1. Which dimension(s) to strengthen first
  2. Which additional skills to run (e.g., "Run /dcf-valuation to cross-check the valuation multiple")
  3. Specific data points to verify or refresh

Adjusted Signal (if original had one)

If the validated analysis contained an Investment Signal block, reproduce it below with a confidence adjustment applied:

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║         VALIDATED INVESTMENT SIGNAL          ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Original Signal:  BULLISH / NEUTRAL / BEARISH║
║ Original Score:   X.X / 10                   ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Confidence Tier:  VERY HIGH / HIGH / MEDIUM  ║
║                   / LOW / VERY LOW           ║
║ Confidence Score: XX / 100                   ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Adjusted Action:  BUY / HOLD / SELL          ║
║ (Signal stands / weakened / reversed by      ║
║  low confidence — see flags above)           ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Output Format

Always end with the standard signal block reflecting the validation result itself (not the original analysis):

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║              INVESTMENT SIGNAL               ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Signal:      BULLISH / NEUTRAL / BEARISH     ║
║ Confidence:  HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW             ║
║ Horizon:     SHORT / MEDIUM / LONG-TERM      ║
║ Score:       X.X / 10                        ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Action:      BUY / HOLD / SELL               ║
║ Conviction:  STRONG / MODERATE / WEAK        ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Score Guide: 8.0–10.0 Strongly Bullish | 6.0–7.9 Moderately Bullish | 4.0–5.9 Neutral | 2.0–3.9 Moderately Bearish | 0.0–1.9 Strongly Bearish Confidence: HIGH (strong data, clear signals) | MEDIUM (mixed signals) | LOW (limited data, conflicting signals) Horizon: SHORT-TERM (1 week–3 months) | MEDIUM-TERM (3 months–1 year) | LONG-TERM (1+ years)

Disclaimer: Educational analysis only. Not financial advice.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.