AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Debug Backend

skill-yerdaulet-damir-vibe-coding-rules-debug-backend · by yerdaulet-damir

Systematic 5-step backend debugging flow for AI-coded FastAPI apps. Load this skill when a bug is reported, a test fails, or unexpected behavior appears in any backend layer. Forces layer isolation before touching code — prevents the "touch 8 files and make it worse" pattern.

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-yerdaulet-damir-vibe-coding-rules-debug-backend

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Debug Backend? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

debug-backend

Stop. Do not edit any file yet. Work through these 5 steps in order.


Step 1 — Locate the layer

Run these greps to find where the bug lives. Check one layer at a time.

# Is it a routing problem? (wrong status code, missing auth, bad request parsing)
grep -n "HTTPException\|status_code\|Depends(" app/routers/.py

# Is it a service logic problem? (wrong calculation, wrong state transition)
grep -n "def \|raise \|return " app/services/.py

# Is it a repository problem? (wrong query, missing user_id scope, transaction issue)
grep -n "SELECT\|filter\|where\|FOR UPDATE" app/repositories/.py

# Is it a provider problem? (timeout, wrong response shape, missing error handling)
grep -n "httpx\|raise\|return\|except" app/providers/.py

Decision: fix only in the layer where the bug lives. Never fix a service bug in the router.


Step 2 — Check the 3 most common AI antipatterns

These cause 80% of production bugs in AI-coded backends. Grep for each:

# Antipattern 1: SQLAlchemy Session leaked into services
grep -rn "AsyncSession\|Session\|from sqlalchemy" app/services/

# Antipattern 2: Provider returning raw dict instead of domain type
grep -rn "return {" app/providers/

# Antipattern 3: Business logic in router (calculation, state change, external call)
grep -c "await.*service\|await.*repo\|if.*balance\|FOR UPDATE" app/routers/*.py

| Result | Root cause | Principle | |--------|-----------|-----------| | Session in services | Hexagonal boundary broken | B1 | | return {} from provider | Missing ACL | B3 | | Logic in router | Layer violation | A3 / code-standards | | No user_id filter in query | Multi-tenancy gap | security-rules |


Step 3 — Write a reproducing test first

Before changing any production code, write a failing test that captures the exact bug.

# Template: place in tests/unit/ or tests/integration/
async def test_():
    # Arrange: minimal setup that triggers the bug
    repo = FakeCreditsRepo()
    repo.seed_balance("user-1", Decimal("5.00"))
    service = CreditsUserService(repo=repo)

    # Act: call the exact code path that fails
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Insufficient balance"):
        await service.charge("user-1", Decimal("10.00"), idempotency_key="idem-1")

    # Assert: prove the invariant that was violated
    assert await repo.get_balance("user-1") == Decimal("5.00")  # not negative

Run it: pytest tests/unit/test_.py::test_ -v It must be RED before you fix anything.


Step 4 — Fix in the correct layer

Minimum change. No opportunistic refactoring. No unrelated cleanup.

Router bug   → fix only app/routers/
Service bug  → fix only app/services/
Repo bug     → fix only app/repositories/
Provider bug → fix only app/providers/

After fixing: run the reproducing test. It must turn GREEN.

pytest tests/unit/test_.py::test_ -v
# Expected: PASSED

Step 5 — Run architecture lint

bash scripts/lint-architecture.sh

Must exit 0. If a check fails, the fix introduced a new architecture violation — revert and fix properly.


Common error → root cause table

| Error | Where to look first | Likely cause | |-------|-------------------|--------------| | 422 Unprocessable Entity | Router — Pydantic schema | Wrong field type or missing required field | | 500 Internal Server Error | Service — exception not caught | Provider returned unexpected shape (dict not JobResult) | | KeyError: 'url' | Provider — ACL missing | Provider response changed, parser not updated | | InsufficientFunds on correct balance | Repo — concurrent hold | Two requests raced, no FOR UPDATE lock | | 401 on authenticated route | Router — Depends(get_current_user_id) missing | Auth dependency not wired | | Test passes, prod fails | Repo — fake vs real diverged | FakeCreditsRepo doesn't match CreditsRepoProtocol | | Logs silent on error | Service — bare except: | Exception swallowed, add logger.exception(...) |


Verification

The skill was applied correctly when:

  • [ ] A failing test exists that reproduces the bug
  • [ ] Fix touches exactly one layer
  • [ ] bash scripts/lint-architecture.sh exits 0
  • [ ] No unrelated files were modified
  • [ ] The reproducing test is now green

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.