AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Authentication Patterns

skill-zebbern-claude-code-guide-authentication-patterns · by zebbern

Authentication patterns: session vs JWT vs OAuth comparison, provider selection (NextAuth, Clerk, Supabase Auth), security checklist, and common mistakes. Use when implementing auth, reviewing auth flows, or choosing auth providers.

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-zebbern-claude-code-guide-authentication-patterns

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets Used
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-zebbern-claude-code-guide-authentication-patterns)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Authentication Patterns? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Authentication Patterns Skill

Reference for implementing secure, production-ready authentication.

WHENTOUSE

Apply this skill when implementing authentication in a project, reviewing existing auth flows for security issues, choosing between auth providers, or migrating between auth strategies. Use the security checklist before shipping any auth-related change.

AUTH_APPROACHES

| Approach | How It Works | Best For | Drawbacks | |----------|-------------|----------|-----------| | Session-based | Server stores session in DB/Redis, client holds session ID cookie | Traditional server-rendered apps, apps needing instant revocation | Requires server-side storage, harder to scale horizontally without shared store | | JWT (stateless) | Server signs token, client sends it on each request | API-first apps, microservices, mobile clients | Cannot revoke without blocklist, token size grows with claims | | OAuth 2.0 / OIDC | Delegates auth to external provider (Google, GitHub, etc.) | Social login, enterprise SSO, reducing auth responsibility | More complex flow, depends on external provider availability | | Passkeys / WebAuthn | Cryptographic key pair, no passwords | High-security apps, passwordless UX | Limited browser support legacy, user education needed |

Decision Guide

  • Server-rendered app with simple needs → Session-based
  • SPA or mobile app calling APIs → JWT with refresh token rotation
  • Want social login or SSO → OAuth 2.0 / OIDC
  • Greenfield with modern UX goals → Passkeys + OAuth fallback

JWTBESTPRACTICES

Token Lifecycle

Login → Access Token (short-lived) + Refresh Token (long-lived, rotated)
  │
  ├─ Access Token: 15 min expiry, sent via httpOnly cookie or Authorization header
  │
  └─ Refresh Token: 7-30 day expiry, stored in httpOnly secure cookie
       │
       └─ On use: issue new access + new refresh token, invalidate old refresh token

Rules

  • [P0-MUST] Set short expiry on access tokens (15 minutes or less).
  • [P0-MUST] Store tokens in httpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Lax cookies — never in localStorage or sessionStorage.
  • [P0-MUST] Implement refresh token rotation — each refresh token is single-use.
  • [P0-MUST] Maintain a server-side blocklist for revoked refresh tokens.
  • [P1-SHOULD] Include only essential claims in JWT payload (sub, iat, exp, role). Keep it small.
  • [P1-SHOULD] Use asymmetric signing (RS256 or ES256) for distributed systems; symmetric (HS256) for single-service only.
  • [P1-SHOULD] Validate iss, aud, and exp claims on every request.
  • [P2-MAY] Use JWE (encrypted JWT) when token payload contains sensitive data.

Token Storage Comparison

| Storage | XSS Safe | CSRF Safe | Recommendation | |---------|----------|-----------|----------------| | httpOnly cookie | Yes | No (needs CSRF token) | Recommended | | localStorage | No | Yes | Never use for auth tokens | | sessionStorage | No | Yes | Never use for auth tokens | | In-memory (JS variable) | Yes | Yes | OK for SPAs, lost on refresh |

PROVIDER_PATTERNS

Comparison

| Provider | Type | Best For | Pricing | Key Features | |----------|------|----------|---------|-------------| | NextAuth / Auth.js | OSS library | Next.js apps wanting full control | Free | 80+ providers, DB adapters, self-hosted | | Clerk | Managed service | Fast launch, pre-built UI, user management | Free tier, then per-MAU | Drop-in components, user dashboard, org support | | Supabase Auth | Managed (part of Supabase) | Apps already using Supabase for DB/storage | Free tier, then per-MAU | Row-level security integration, magic links, SSO | | Lucia | OSS library | Full control, minimal abstraction | Free | Session-based, framework-agnostic, type-safe |

When to Use Each

  • NextAuth / Auth.js: You want provider flexibility, self-hosting, and database session control. Best when you need custom flows.
  • Clerk: You want auth done fast with pre-built UI components. Best for MVPs and teams that don't want to build auth UI.
  • Supabase Auth: You're already using Supabase. Auth integrates with RLS policies for row-level security.
  • Lucia: You want a minimal, type-safe session library without framework lock-in.

NextAuth.js Setup Pattern

// app/api/auth/[...nextauth]/route.ts
import NextAuth from "next-auth";
import GitHub from "next-auth/providers/github";
import { PrismaAdapter } from "@auth/prisma-adapter";
import { prisma } from "@/lib/prisma";

export const { handlers, auth, signIn, signOut } = NextAuth({
  adapter: PrismaAdapter(prisma),
  providers: [
    GitHub({
      clientId: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_ID!,
      clientSecret: process.env.GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET!,
    }),
  ],
  callbacks: {
    session({ session, user }) {
      session.user.id = user.id;
      return session;
    },
  },
});

SECURITY_CHECKLIST

Before Shipping Auth

  • [ ] Rate limiting: Login endpoint limited to 5-10 attempts per minute per IP.
  • [ ] CSRF protection: Anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing requests (or use SameSite=Lax cookies).
  • [ ] Password hashing: Using bcrypt (cost 12+) or argon2id — never MD5, SHA-1, or plain SHA-256.
  • [ ] HTTPS only: All auth endpoints served over TLS. Cookies have Secure flag.
  • [ ] Input validation: Email format, password length (min 8, max 128), no SQL/NoSQL injection vectors.
  • [ ] Account enumeration: Login and registration return the same response whether account exists or not.
  • [ ] Session invalidation: Logout invalidates server-side session/refresh token, not just client cookie.
  • [ ] MFA support: TOTP (authenticator app) or WebAuthn as second factor for sensitive accounts.
  • [ ] Password reset: Time-limited tokens (1 hour), single-use, sent over secure channel.
  • [ ] Audit logging: Log auth events (login, logout, failed attempts, password changes) with timestamp and IP.

Password Hashing

// Using bcrypt
import bcrypt from "bcrypt";

const SALT_ROUNDS = 12;

async function hashPassword(password: string): Promise {
  return bcrypt.hash(password, SALT_ROUNDS);
}

async function verifyPassword(password: string, hash: string): Promise {
  return bcrypt.compare(password, hash);
}
// Using argon2 (preferred for new projects)
import argon2 from "argon2";

async function hashPassword(password: string): Promise {
  return argon2.hash(password, { type: argon2.argon2id });
}

async function verifyPassword(hash: string, password: string): Promise {
  return argon2.verify(hash, password);
}

COMMON_MISTAKES

| Mistake | Risk | Fix | |---------|------|-----| | Storing JWT in localStorage | XSS can steal tokens | Use httpOnly cookies | | Long-lived JWTs (days/weeks) | Stolen token is valid for extended period | 15 min access token + refresh rotation | | Missing CSRF protection | Attackers can forge requests from other sites | SameSite=Lax cookies + CSRF token | | Weak password requirements | Brute force and credential stuffing | Min 8 chars, check against breached password lists | | Exposing user existence on login | Account enumeration | Generic "Invalid credentials" message | | Not rotating refresh tokens | Stolen refresh token grants indefinite access | Single-use refresh tokens with rotation | | Hardcoding secrets in source | Credential leak via git history | Use environment variables, never commit secrets | | Missing rate limiting on login | Brute force attacks | 5-10 attempts/min per IP, exponential backoff | | Rolling your own crypto | Subtle vulnerabilities | Use established libraries (bcrypt, argon2, jose) | | Not validating JWT claims | Token misuse across services | Always verify iss, aud, exp |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.